Skip to main content
Log in

Metrological Provision of Specimens Intended for Adjusting Ultrasonic Defectoscopes in Monitoring Nonferrous Metal Articles

  • The Metrological Service
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Abstract

Suggestions are given for improving regulatory documents as concerns replacement of measurement monitoring implemented using a collection of specimens. An example is given for alternative measurement of quality indices for specimens made from materials with different acoustic properties. An essential factor in increasing the accuracy of specimen certification is the suppression of noise field effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. F. N. Nuriev et al., Defektoskop., No. 10, 57 (1963).

  2. RMG 29-99, Recommendations for Intergovernmental Standardization. GSI. Metrology. Main Terms and Determination.

  3. A. A. Shcherbakov, Defektoskop., No. 3, 22 (2004).

  4. A. A. Shcherbakov, Izmer. Tekh., No. 6, 62 (2004).

  5. GOST 23829-85, Acoustic Nondestructive Monitoring. Terms and Determination.

  6. GOST 14782-86, Nondestructive Monitoring. Welded Joints. Ultrasonic Methods.

  7. TsM 01.06.05.01-02, Certification Procedure for Standard Specimens of an Enterprise for Adjusting Ultrasonic Echo-Pulse Defectoscopes. TNIITMASh, Moscow, Volgodonsk (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. GOST 24507-80, Nondestructive Monitoring. Forgings of Ferrous and Nonferrous Metals. Methods of Ultrasonic Defectoscopy.

  9. V. N. Danilov and V. A. Voronkov, V Mire Nerazrush. Kontr., No. 2, 20 (2001).

  10. M. B. Gitis, Defektoskop., No. 1, 74 (1984).

  11. GOST 21397-81, Nondestructive Monitoring. Set of Standard Specimens for Ultrasonic Monitoring of Semifinished Products and Articles Made from Aluminum Alloys. Technical Conditions.

  12. L. D. Kruglov and V. M. Grishina, Defektoskop., No. 5, 23 (1984).

  13. V. F. Dianov and V. F. Podval’nyi, Defektoskop., No. 3, 52 (1972).

  14. V. G. Shcherbinskii, Ultrasonic Monitoring Technology for Welded Joints [in Russian], Tisso, Moscow (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. N. Danilov and I. N. Ermolov, Defektoskop., No. 7, 35 (2000).

  16. M. V. Rozina, V Mire Nerazrush. Kontr., No. 3, 28 (1999).

  17. S. N. Goryunov and E. F. Kretov, “Metrological provision in the field of nondestructive monitoring, ” in: Proc. 2nd All-Russia Seminar, Moscow (2000).

  18. V. N. Danilov and V. A. Voronkov, Defektoskop., No. 2, 97 (2004).

  19. E. Borel, Probability and Reliability [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. GOST 8.207-76, GSI. Direct Measurements with Repeated Observations. Methods for Processing Results of Observations. Basic Assumptions.

  21. A. A. Shcherbakov and V. N. Danilov, Defektoskop., No. 5, 60 (1999).

  22. V. A. Kuznetsov and G. V. Yalunina, General Metrology [in Russian], Izd. Standartov, Moscow (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. A. Shcherbakov and V. N. Danilov, Defektoskop., No. 4, 23 (1998).

  24. A. A. Shcherbakov and V. N. Danilov, Defektoskop., No. 3, 42 (1999).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 4, pp. 67–71, April, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shcherbakov, A.A. Metrological Provision of Specimens Intended for Adjusting Ultrasonic Defectoscopes in Monitoring Nonferrous Metal Articles. Meas Tech 48, 410–416 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-005-0157-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-005-0157-2

Key words

Navigation