Notes
This is justified on their account, presumably, from three things they argue in Chapter 8: (1) Well-being is determined by the balance between enjoyment, which is good, and suffering, which is bad. (2) Goods are enjoyed to a greater degree by those with “sufficient cognitive capabilities” (p. 228). (3) Enjoyment and suffering are asymmetrical; less cognitive function is required to suffer than to enjoy. It seems the argument that parents’ well-being overrides the child’s well-being follows from these aspects of their account of well-being.
References
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2016. The minority body: a theory of disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2009. Disability, minority, and difference. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4): 337–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maples, C. DeGrazia, David, and Millum, Joseph. A theory of bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 316 pp. $99.99 (cloth) ISBN 978,316,515,839, $24.99 (paper) SBN 9,781,009,011,747. Theor Med Bioeth 44, 539–544 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-023-09626-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-023-09626-2