Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 179–193 | Cite as

From method to hermeneutics: which epistemological framework for narrative medicine?

Article

Abstract

The past 10 years have seen considerable developments in the use of narrative in medicine, primarily through the emergence of the so-called narrative medicine. In this article, I question narrative medicine’s self-understanding and contend that one of the most prominent issues is its lack of a clear epistemological framework. Drawing from Gadamer’s work on hermeneutics, I first show that narrative medicine is deeply linked with the hermeneutical field of knowledge. Then I try to identify which claims can be legitimately expected from narrative medicine, and which ones cannot be. I scrutinize in particular whether narrative medicine can legitimately grasp the patient’s lived experience of his or her illness. In the last section of this article, I begin to explore the potential usefulness of this epistemological clarification. This analysis allows for a further understanding of what is really at stake with narrative medicine, and thus to identify when it may be convenient, and when it may not. Furthermore, this clarification opens up promising new possibilities of dialogue with critics of the field. I conclude that narrative medicine finds its proper place as a possible tool available to mediate dialogue, which is at the heart of the clinical encounter in medical practice.

Keywords

Narrative medicine Hermeneutics Epistemology Gadamer Personalized medicine 

References

  1. 1.
    Charon, Rita. 2006. Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charon, Rita. 2001. Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 286: 1897–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charon, Rita. 2013. Narrative medicine in the international education of physicians. La Presse Medicale 42: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DasGupta, Sayantani, and Rita Charon. 2004. Personal illness narratives: Using reflective writing to teach empathy. Academic Medicine 79: 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charon, Rita. 2004. Narrative and medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 350: 862–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brody, Howard. 1985. Philosophy of medicine and other humanities: Toward a wholistic view. Theoretical Medicine 6: 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel, Stephen L. 1986. The patient as text: A model of clinical hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine 7: 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, M.Wayne. 1994. Is medicine hermeneutics all the way down? Theoretical Medicine 15: 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leder, Drew. 1990. Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 11: 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gadamer, Hans Georg. 2004. Truth and method. trans. Joel C. Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baron, Richard J. 1990. Medical hermeneutics: Where is the “text” we are interpreting? Theoretical Medicine 11: 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svenaeus, Fredrik. 2000. Hermeneutics of clinical practice: The question of textuality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21: 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gatens-Robinson, Eugenie. 1986. Clinical judgment and the rationality of the human sciences. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charon, Rita. 2007. What to do with stories: The sciences of narrative medicine. Canadian Family Physician 53: 1265–1267.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charon, Rita, and Peter Wyer. 2008. The art of medicine: Narrative evidence based medicine. The Lancet 371: 296–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Macnaughton, Jane. 2009. The dangerous practice of empathy. Lancet 373: 1940–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strawson, Galen. 2004. Against narrativity. Ratio 17: 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woods, Angela. 2011. The limits of narrative: Provocations for the medical humanities. Medical Humanities 37: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Mahony, Seamus. 2013. Against narrative medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56: 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menashe, Doron, and Mutal E. Shamash. 2005. The narrative fallacy. International Commentary on Evidence 3 (1): 3. doi:10.2202/1554-4567.1034.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solomon, Miriam. 2008. Epistemological reflections on the art of medicine and narrative medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51: 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morris, David B. 2008. Narrative medicines: Challenge and resistance. The Permanente Journal 12: 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ricœur, Paul. 1991. From text to action. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1996. The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age. trans. Jason Gaiger and Nicholas Walker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Svenaeus, Fredrik. 2000. The hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health: Steps towards a philosophy of medical practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Interdisciplinary Researches in Human and Social Sciences (CRISES, EA 4424)Paul-Valéry UniversityMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Espace Régional de Réflexion Éthique du Languedoc-RoussillonHôpital La ColombièreMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations