Literature on the mental capacities and cognitive mechanisms of the great apes has been silent about whether they can act autonomously. This paper provides a philosophical theory of autonomy supported by psychological studies of the cognitive mechanisms that underlie chimpanzee behavior to argue that chimpanzees can act autonomously even though their psychological mechanisms differ from those of humans. Chimpanzees satisfy the two basic conditions of autonomy: (1) liberty (the absence of controlling influences) and (2) agency (self-initiated intentional action), each of which is specified here in terms of conditions of understanding, intention, and self-control. In this account, chimpanzees make knowledge-based choices reflecting a richly information-based and socially sophisticated understanding of the world. Finally, two major theories of autonomy (Kantian theory and two-level theory) are rejected as too narrow to adequately address these issues, necessitating the modifications made in the present approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See the original formulation of this view in Faden and Beauchamp [4, ch. 10].
For a brilliant exposition of Darwin and the moral importance of his theories about nonhuman animals, see Rachels .
For a relevant insight about minimal autonomy, see [31, p. 82].
Frankfurt’s account of autonomy is less well developed than his theory of persons, but see further his account of autonomy in [45, chs. 9, 11].
For a number of these issues, see Varner .
Buss, Sarah. 2013. Personal autonomy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personal-autonomy/. Accessed June 20, 2013.
Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Harm to self. Vol. 3 of The moral limits of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, Tom L. 2005. Who deserves autonomy and whose autonomy deserves respect? In Personal autonomy: New essays in personal autonomy and its role in contemporary moral philosophy, ed. James Taylor, 310–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faden, Ruth R., and Tom L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, John. 1980. The intentionality of intention and action. Cognitive Science 4: 47–70.
Tomasello, Michael, and Josep Call. 1997. Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Menzel, Emil W. 1973. Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182(4115): 943–945.
Herrmann, Esther, Victoria Wobber, and Josep Call. 2008. Great apes’ (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience. Journal of Comparative Psychology 122: 220–230.
Boesch, Christophe, and Hedwige Boesch. 1984. Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates 25(2): 160–170.
Goodall, Jane. 1986. The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Slocombe, Katie, and Klaus Zuberbuehler. 2005. Agonistic screams in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) vary as a function of social role. Journal of Comparative Psychology 119(1): 67–77.
Liebal, Katja, Josep Call, and Michael Tomasello. 2004. Use of gesture sequences in chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 64(4): 377–396.
Roberts, Anna I., Sara-Jane Vick, and Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith. 2013. Communicative intentions in wild chimpanzees: Persistence and elaboration in gestural signalling. Animal Cognition 16(2): 187–196.
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Penn, Derek C., Keith J. Holyoak, and Daniel J. Povinelli. 2008. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2): 109–130.
Call, Josep, Brian Hare, Malinda Carpenter, and Michael Tomasello. 2004. “Unwilling” versus “unable”: Chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science 7(4): 488–498.
Hare, Brian, and Michael Tomasello. 2004. Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour 68: 571–581.
Barth, Jochen, and Josep Call. 2006. Tracking the displacement of objects: A series of tasks with great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) and young children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 32(3): 239–252.
Boysen, Sally T., and Gary G. Berntson. 1995. Responses to quantity-perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Behavior Processes 21(1): 82–86.
Hare, Brian, Josep Call, Brian Agnetta, and Michael Tomasello. 2000. Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Animal Behaviour 59: 771–785.
Melis, Alicia P., Josep Call, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. Journal of Comparative Psychology 120(2): 154–162.
Institute of Medicine. 2011. Chimpanzees in biomedical and behavioral research: Assessing the necessity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Melis, Alicia P., Brian Hare, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311(5765): 1297–1300.
Baker, Kate. 1996. Chimpanzees in single cages and small social groups: Effects of housing on behavior. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 35(3): 71–74.
Davenport, Richard K., Charles M. Rogers, and Duane M. Rumbaugh. 1973. Long-term cognitive deficits in chimpanzees associated with early impoverished rearing. Developmental Psychology 9: 343–347.
Crockford, Catherine, and Christophe Boesch. 2003. Context-specific calls in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus: Analysis of barks. Animal Behaviour 66: 115–125.
Pruetz, Jill D., and Thomas C. LaDuke. 2010. Brief communication: Reaction to fire by savanna chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Fongoli, Senegal: Conceptualization of “fire behavior” and the case for a chimpanzee model. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 141(4): 646–650.
Muller, M., S. Kahlenberg, M. Emery Thompson, and R. Wrangham. 2007. Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B 274: 1009–1014.
Nozick, Robert. 1969. Coercion. In Philosophy, science and method: Essays in honor of Ernest Nagel, ed. Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes and Morton White. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Wertheimer, A. 1987. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jaworska, Agnieska. 2009. Caring, minimal autonomy, and the limits of liberalism. In Naturalized bioethics: Toward responsible knowing, practice, ed. Hilde Lindemann, Marian Verkerk and Margaret Urban Walker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wall, Edmund. 2001. Voluntary action. Philosophia 28: 127–136.
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on ethics. Trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. The metaphysics of morals, part II: The metaphysical principles of virtue. In Practical philosophy, ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. Kant’s formula of humanity. In Creating the kingdom of ends, 106–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. 2011. Interacting with animals: A Kantian account. In Oxford handbook of animal ethics, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Trans. James Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Emery Thompson, Melissa, Sonya M. Kahlenberg, and Richard W. Wrangham. 2007. Core area quality is associated with variance in reproductive success among female chimpanzees at Kibale National Park. Animal Behaviour 73(3): 501–512.
Ross, Stephen R., Sarah Calcutt, Steven J. Schapiro, and Jann Hau. 2011. Space use selectivity by chimpanzees and gorillas in an indoor-outdoor enclosure. American Journal of Primatology 73(2): 197–208.
Gilby, Ian C., and Richard W. Wrangham. 2007. Risk-prone hunting by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) increases during periods of high diet quality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61(11): 1771–1779.
Muller, Martin, Melissa Emery Thompson, and Richard W. Wrangham. 2006. Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology 16(22): 2234–2238.
Penn, Derek C., Keith J. Holyoak, and Daniel J. Povinelli. 2012. So, are we the massively lucky species? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(4): 236–237.
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In The importance of what we care about, 11–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Frankfurt, Harry. 1999. Necessity, volition, and love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Call, Josep. 2010. Do apes know that they could be wrong? Animal Cognition 13(5): 689–700.
Templer, Victoria L., and Robert R. Hampton. 2012. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) show robust evidence for memory awareness across multiple generalization tests. Animal Cognition 15(3): 409–419.
Krachun, Carla, and Josep Call. 2009. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) know what can be seen from where. Animal Cognition 12(2): 317–331.
Carruthers, Peter. 2008. Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind and Language 23(1): 58–89.
Carruthers, Peter. 2011. Animal mentality: Its character, extent, and moral significance. In Oxford handbook of animal ethics, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey, 373–406. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenwald, Anthony G., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 1995. Implicit social cognition—Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102(1): 4–27.
Bargh, John A., and Ezequiel Morsella. 2008. The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(1): 73–79.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1058186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beauchamp, T.L., Wobber, V. Autonomy in chimpanzees. Theor Med Bioeth 35, 117–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-014-9287-3
- Animal ethics
- Chimpanzee research
- IOM chimpanzee report
- Research ethics