Skip to main content

Islamic bioethics: between sacred law, lived experiences, and state authority

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics volume 34, pages 65–80 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

There is burgeoning interest in the field of “Islamic” bioethics within public and professional circles, and both healthcare practitioners and academic scholars deploy their respective expertise in attempts to cohere a discipline of inquiry that addresses the needs of contemporary bioethics stakeholders while using resources from within the Islamic ethico-legal tradition. This manuscript serves as an introduction to the present thematic issue dedicated to Islamic bioethics. Using the collection of papers as a guide the paper outlines several critical questions that a comprehensive and cohesive Islamic bioethical theory must address: (i) What are the relationships between Islamic law (Sharīʿah), moral theology (uṣūl al-Fiqh), and Islamic bioethics? (ii) What is the relationship between an Islamic bioethics and the lived experiences of Muslims? and (iii) What is the relationship between Islamic bioethics and the state? This manuscript, and the papers in this special collection, provides insight into how Islamic bioethicists and Muslim communities are addressing some of these questions, and aims to spur further dialogue around these overaching questions as Islamic bioethics coalesces into a true field of scholarly and practical inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. For more information about the conference as well as video recordings of the lectures, see https://pmr.uchicago.edu/studies/content/where-religion-bioethics-and-policy-meet-interdisciplinary-conference (accessed March 12, 2013). .

  2. Sunni Islam has two prominent schools of extant scholastic theology (kalām): the Māturīdī and the Ashʿarī. Often referenced in discussion of kalām is the Muʿtalizite school which more closely relates to Shiite Islam. Please see Sherman Jackson [7, chs. 1–4] for a concise overview.

  3. The extant Sunni schools of Islamic law are four and are named after their promulgators: Mālikī, Ḥanafī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī. Please refer to any of a number of Islamic legal manuals for further details.

References

  1. Curlin, Farr A., Ryan E. Lawrence, Marshall H. Chin, and John D. Lantos. 2007. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. New England Journal of Medicine 356: 593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Curlin, Farr A. 2008. A case for studying the relationship between religion and the practice of medicine. Academic Medicine 83(12): 1118–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jonsen, Albert R. 2006. A history of religion and bioethics. In Handbook of bioethics and religion, ed. D.E. Guinn, 23–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Padela, Aasim I., Hasan Shanawani, and Ahsan Arozullah. 2011. Medical experts and Islamic scholars deliberating over brain death: gaps in the applied Islamic bioethics discourse. Muslim World 101(1): 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. 2003. Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nyazee, Imran Ahsan Khan. 2005. Theories of Islamic law. Islamabad, Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson, Sherman. 2009. Islam and the problem of black suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Padela, Aasim I., Steven W. Furber, Mohammad A. Kholwadia, and Ebrahim Moosa. 2013. Dire necessity and transformation: entry-points for modern science in Islamic bioethical assessment of porcine products in vaccines. Bioethics. doi:10.1111/bioe.12016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, Wendy G., Robert M. Arnold, Derek C. Angus, and Cindy L. Bryce. 2008. Posttraumatic stress and complicated grief in family members of patients in the intensive care unit. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(11): 1871–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Givens, Jane L., Ruth P. Lopez, Kathleen M. Mazor, and Susan L. Mitchell. 2012. Sources of stress for family members of nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associate Disorders 26(3): 254–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bilgel, Halil, Nazan Bilgel, Necla Okan, Sadik Kilicturgay, Yilmaz Ozen, and Nusret Korun. 1991. Public attitudes toward organ donation: a survey in a Turkish community. Transplant International 4(4): 243–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaheen, Faissal A.M., Mohammad Z. Souqiyyeh, Besher Al-Attar, Ahmed Jaralla, and Abdul Rahman Al-Swailem. 1996. Survey of opinion of secondary school students on organ donation. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation 7: 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Randhawa, Gurch. 1998. An exploratory study examining the influence of religion on attitudes towards organ donation among the Asian population in Luton, UK. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 13(8): 1949–1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheikh, Aziz, and Sangeeta Dhami. 2000. Attitudes to organ donation among South Asians in the UK. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 93(3): 161–162.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bilgel, Halil, Ganime Sadikoglu, Olgun Goktas, and Nazan Bilgel. 2004. A survey of the public attitudes towards organ donation in a Turkish community and of the changes that have taken place in the last 12 years. Transplant International 17(3): 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alkhawari, F.S., G.V. Stimson, and Anthony N. Warrens. 2005. Attitudes toward transplantation in UK Muslim Indo-Asians in west London. American Journal of Transplantation 5(6): 1326–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loch, A., I.N. Hilmi, Z. Mazam, Y. Pillay, and D.S.K. Choon. 2010. Differences in attitude towards cadaveric organ donation: Observations in a multiracial Malaysian society. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 17: 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Padela, Aasim I., Shoaib Rasheed, Gareth J.W. Warren, Hwajung Choi, and Amit K. Mathur. 2011. Factors associated with positive attitudes toward organ donation in Arab Americans. Clinical Transplantation 25(5): 800–808.

  19. Yilmaz, Tonguc Utku. 2011. Importance of education in organ donation. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation 9(6): 370–375.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghaly, Mohammed. 2012. Religio-ethical discussions on organ donation among Muslims in Europe: an example of transnational Islamic bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15: 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghaly, Mohammed. 2012. Organ donation and Muslims in the Netherlands: a transnational fatwa in focus. Recht Van De Islam 26: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Razaq, Samar, and Mohammed Sajad. 2007. A cross sectional study to investigate reasons for low organ donor rates amongst Muslims in Birmingham. Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics 4(2).

  23. Rasheed, Shoaib A. 2011. Organ donation among Muslims: an examination of medical researchers’ efforts to encourage donation in the Muslim community. BA diss., University of Michigan. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/85315/sarashee.pdf;jsessionid=AE555C6EC5983516FCF464D2926AAE9E?sequence=1. Accessed March 12, 2013.

  24. Library of Congress. 2012. Romanization tables: Arabic. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/roman.html. Accessed March 15, 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This special collection as well as the conference Where Religion, Bioethics, and Policy Meet: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Islamic Bioethics and End-of-Life Care was supported by the following University of Michigan programs, centers, and institutes: the Center for Ethics and Public Life, the Center for Middle Eastern and North African Studies, the International Institute, the Islamic Studies Program, the Office of the Vice President for Research, the Program in Society and Medicine, and the Division of General Internal Medicine in the Department of Medicine. Additional support and funding was provided by the Greenwall Foundation, Darul Qasim Institute, and the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding. Special acknowledgements go to Drs. Rod Hayward, Dan Sulmasy, and Farr Curlin for encouragement and advice and for helping me to traverse all the barriers and hoops on the path towards this issue. We acknowledge the timely reviews and critical comments of the cadre of peer-reviewers who helped to enhance the quality of the papers. My deepest gratitude to Katie Gunter for being an exceptional research assistant and project coordinator. Lastly, my thanks to Brigid Adviento and Daniel Kim for their varied assistance with this project.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Initiative on Islam and Medicine, Program on Medicine and Religion, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 5068, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aasim I. Padela

  2. Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 5068, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aasim I. Padela

  3. Maclean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 5068, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aasim I. Padela

Authors
  1. Aasim I. Padela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aasim I. Padela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padela, A.I. Islamic bioethics: between sacred law, lived experiences, and state authority. Theor Med Bioeth 34, 65–80 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-013-9249-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-013-9249-1

Keywords

  • Moral theology
  • Muslim medical ethics
  • Islamic legal theory