Abstract
What does autonomy mean from a moral point of view? Throughout Western history, autonomy has had no less than four different meanings. The first is political: the capacity of old cities and modern states to give themselves their own laws. The second is metaphysical, and was introduced by Kant in the second half of the 18th century. In this meaning, autonomy is understood as an intrinsic characteristic of all rational beings. Opposed to this is the legal meaning, in which actions are called autonomous when performed with due information and competency and without coercion. This last meaning, the most frequently used in bioethics, is primarily legal instead of moral. Is there a proper moral meaning of the word autonomy? If so, this would be a fourth meaning. Acts can only be called moral when they are postconventional (using the terminology coined by Lawrence Kohlberg), inner-directed (as expressed by David Riesman), and responsible (according to Hannah Arendt). Such acts are autonomous in this new, fourth, and to my mind, the only one proper, moral meaning. The goal of ethics cannot be other than forming human beings capable of making autonomous and responsible decisions, and doing so because they think this is their duty and not because of any other nonmoral motivation, like comfort, convenience, or satisfaction. The goal of ethics is to promote postconventional and mature human beings. This was what Socrates tried to do with the young people of Athens. And it is also the objective of every course of ethics and of any process of training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thucydides. 2009. The Peloponnesian War. Trans. Martin Hammond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xenophon. 1979. A history of my times. Trans. Rex Warner. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Isocrates. 1980. Evagoras. Trans. George Norlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/. Accessed June 2, 2011.
Bonitz, Hermann. 1955. Index Aristotelicus. Graz: U. Verlagsanstalt.
Aristotle. 2000. Politics. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Aristotle. 1946. The works of Aristotle: Vol. XI: Rhetorica, De Rhetorica ad Alexandrum, Poetica. Trans. W. D. Ross, W. Rhys Roberts, E. S. Forster, and I. Bywater. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schneewind, J.B. 1998. The invention of autonomy: A history of modern moral philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Critique of practical reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Ed. Lara Denis. Toronto: Broadview.
Childress, James F. 1997. Practical Reasoning in Bioethics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dworkin, Gerald. 1976. Autonomy and behavior control. Hastings Center Report 6(1): 23–28.
Kant, Immanuel. 1973. What is enlightenment? In The enlightenment: A comprehensive anthology, ed. Peter Gay. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rachels, James. 1971. God and human attitudes. Religious Studies 7: 325–337.
Wolff, Robert. 1970. In defense of anarchism. New York: Harper & Row.
Faden, Ruth R., and Tom L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas. 1972. A theory of freedom of expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 204–226.
Riesman, David, Reuel Denney, and Nathan Glazer. 1950. The lonely crowd. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. London: Penguin.
Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books.
Crain, William. 1985. Theories of Development (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards, C.P. 1981. The comparative study of the development of moral judgment and reasoning. In Handbook of cross-cultural human development, ed. R.H. Munroe, R.I. Munroe, and B.B. Whiting, 501–528. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gracia, D. The many faces of autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth 33, 57–64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9208-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9208-2