Skip to main content
Log in

Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is tempting to argue that Kantian moral philosophy justifies prohibiting both human germ-line genetic engineering and non-therapeutic genetic engineering because they fail to respect human dignity. There are, however, good reasons for resisting this temptation. In fact, Kant’s moral philosophy provides reasons that support genetic engineering—even germ-line and non-therapeutic. This is true of Kant’s imperfect duties to seek one’s own perfection and the happiness of others. It is also true of the categorical imperative. Kant’s moral philosophy does, however, provide limits to justifiable genetic engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allhoff, F. (2005) Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D., and Brownsword, R. (2001) Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownsword, R. (2005) Code, Control, and Choice: Why East is East and West is West. Legal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars 25: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownsword, R. “Neither East nor West, Is Mid-West Best?” (2006) 3:1 SCRIPT-ed 15 @: <http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/vol3–1/brownsword.asp>.

  • Feinberg, J. (1980) “The Child’s Right to an Open Future.” In: W. Aiken, H. LaFollette (Eds) Whose Child: Children’s Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, pp 124–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukluyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. The Future of Human Nature. Translated by W. Rehg, M. Pensky, and H. Beister. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.

  • Harding, J. (1991) Beyond Abortion: Human Genetics and the New Eugenics. Pepperdine Law Review 18: 471–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Edited and translated by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

  • Kant, I. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer and translated by P.␣Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

  • Kant, I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 43–108.

  • Kant, I. Lecture on Ethics. Edited by J.B. Schneewind and translated by P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

  • Kant, I. ``On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory.” In Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 279–309.

  • Kant, I. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 355–540.

  • Kant, I. “Toward Perpetual Peace.” In Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 317–351.

  • Kasachkoff, T. (1994) Paternalism: Does Gratitude Mmake it Okay? Social Theory and Practice 20:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, M. (1991) Ethical Issues in Manipulating the Human Germ Line. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: 621–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, P. (2005) Stem Cells, Biotechnology, and Human Rights: Implications for a Posthuman Future. Hastings Center Report 35: 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, R., and Davis, L.H. (1992) Germ-Line Gene therapy and the Medical Imperative. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2: 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens, E. (ed.) (2007) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical, Social Implications. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, L. (1977) Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H. (1999) Silver Spoons and Golden Genes. In J. Burley (ed) The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A.W. (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

A previous version of this paper was presented at the Combined 22nd European Association of Committees of Medical Ethics and the 19th European Conference on Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care, Barcelona, Spain, August 26, 2005. I am indebted to the helpful comments of conference participants. I am also indebted to comments by anonymous referees for Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Gunderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunderson, M. Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering. Theor Med Bioeth 28, 87–102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4

Keywords

Navigation