Abstract
Immediately after the September 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the World Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon, and a plane over Pennsylvania, many in the West, but particularly the United States of America, felt urgently the pain of the question ‘Why do they hate us?’ in relation both to those who directly perpetrated those dreadful events and to those who sympathised with their perpetrators. In this paper, I will offer an account of some of the conceptual issues at stake in addressing seriously such a question as an opportunity for self-examination. I will argue that questions of this kind are the very warp and weft of international relations at their most serious levels and that the often glib demonisation of ‘them’ who hate us serves us badly in coming to terms with the problems the West faces in its relations with the Muslim world. I use this most pressing of international relations issues as a test of the prospects of Utilitarianism as a viable ‘ethics of international relations’ arguing that its notions of the good and its resources for criticism of desires and preferences are a cause for scandal in our inter-cultural negotiations with other traditions of civilization, particularly the Muslim civilization. In many ways, rather than being part of the solution, Utilitarianism is part of the problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B Barber (2000) Jihad vs McWorld Ballentine Books New York
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by J. Burns and H.L.A. Hart, London: Athlone Press, 1970.
J.M Brennan (1977) The Open Texture of Moral Concepts Macmillan London
J Carroll (2002) Terror: A Meditation on the Meaning of September 11 Melbourne Scribe
T Friedman (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree Anchor Books New York
F Fukayama (1992) The End of History and the Last Man Free Press New York
Gaita, R. ‘A Last Resort’. In Why the War was WrongEdited by R. Gaita. 81--112. Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2003.
C Geertz (1977) The Interpretation of Cultures Basic Books New York
R.E Goodin (1995) Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
G Graham (1997) Ethics and International Relations Blackwell Oxford
Kevin, Tony. ‘Foreign Policy’. In The Howard Years. Edited by R. Manne. 291--313. Melbourne: Black Inc., 2004.
McDowell, J.H. ‘Non-Cognitivism and Rule Following’. In Mind, Value and Reality. Chap. 10. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
A MacIntyre (1984) After Virtue University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame. IN
A MacIntyre (1989) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame IN
J.S Mill (2002) Utilitarianism Indianapolis Hackett
Miller, R.W. ‘Terrorism, War and Empire’. In Terrorism and International Justice. Edited by J.P. Sterba. Ch. 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
F.A Rauf Imam (2004) What’s Right with Islam: A New Vision for Muslims and the West Harper San Francisco
P. Singer T. Gregg (2004) How Ethical is Australia? An Examination of Australia’s Record as a Global Citizen Black Inc Melbourne
Singer, P. “All Animals are Equal.” Philosophic Exchange 1 (1974): 103–116.
Singer, P. ‘Life’s Uncertain Voyage’. In Metaphysics and Morality. Edited by P. Pettit. 154--172. New York: Blackwell, 1987.
P Singer (1987) Making Babies: The New Science and Ethics of Conception Macmillan New York
P Singer (1996) Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics St Martin’s Press New York
P Singer (2001) Animal Liberation Ecco New York
P Singer (2002) One World: The Ethics of Globalisation Text Publishing Melbourne
Sterba, J.P. ‘Terrorism and International Justice’. In Terrorism and International Justice. Edited by J.P. Sterba. Ch. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
J.P Sterba (2003) Terrorism and International Justice Oxford University Press Oxford
Walzer, M. ‘The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (1979/80): 209–229.
Walzer, M. ‘The Reform of the Intenational System’. In Studies of War and Peace. Edited by O. Osterud. 227--250. Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1986.
Walzer, M. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.
B.A.O Williams (1993) Morality: An Introduction to Ethics Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quilter, J.G. Why do They Hate us, Thick and Thin?. Theor Med Bioeth 26, 241–260 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3982-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3982-z