In the debate regarding the moral status of human embryos, the Embryo Rescue Case has been used to suggest that embryos are not rightholders. This case is premised on the idea that in a situation where one has a choice between saving some number of embryos or a child, it seems wrong to save the embryos and not the child. If so, it seems that embryos cannot be rightholders. In this paper, I argue that the Embryo Rescue Case does not independently show that embryos are not rightholders.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Annas, G. “A French Homunculus in a Tennessee Court.” Hastings Center Report 19, 6. (1989): 20–22.
Liao, S. Matthew. “Virtually all Human Beings as Rightholders: A Non-Speciesist Approach.” Manuscript.
D. Marquis (1989) ArticleTitle“Why Abortion is Immoral” Journal of Philosophy 86 183–203 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2026961
J. McMahan (2002) The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life Oxford University Press Oxford
M. Sandel (2005) ArticleTitle“The Ethical Implications of Human Cloning” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 IssueID2 241–47
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, S.M. The Embryo Rescue Case. Theor Med Bioeth 27, 141–147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-1390-z
- moral status
- time-relative interest