References
Deutsch, David. 2011. The beginning of infinity: Explanations that transform the world. London: Penguin UK.
Firestein, Stuart. 2012. Ignorance: How it drives science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Firestein, Stuart. 2015. Failure: Why science is so successful. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flake, Jessica K., and Eiko I. Fried. 2019. Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm.
Glass, David J. 2014. Experimental design for biologists. No. QH323. 5. G52. Cold Spring Harbour, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Ioannidis, John P.A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124.
Oberauer, Klaus, and Stephan Lewandowsky. 2019. Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26 (5): 1596–1618.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349: 6251.
Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Platt, John R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146 (3642): 347–353.
Popper, K. 2005. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Yarkoni, Tal. 2019. The generalizability crisis. https://psyarxiv.com/jqw35. Accessed 22 July 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Dongen, N.N.N. The scientific hypothesis is here to stay. Metascience 29, 391–394 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00556-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00556-6