A review of theoretical virtues in science debate

Samuel Schindler: Theoretical virtues in science: uncovering reality through theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, xii +249 pp, £ 75 HB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Beebe, J. 2009. The abductivist reply to skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79: 605–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs, S., and J. Wilson. 2016. The a priority of abduction. Philosophical Studies 174: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brueckner, A. 2001. BonJour’s a priori justification of induction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kornblith, H. 2000. The impurity of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81: 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McMullin, E. (1976). The fertility of theory and the unit for appraisal in science. In Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos (pp. 395–432). Dordrecht: Springer.

  7. Nolan, D. 1999. Is fertility virtuous in its own right? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2): 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saatsi, J., and P. Vickers. 2010. Miraculous success? Inconsistency and untruth in Kirchhoff’s diffraction theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1): 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren Bradley.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bradley, D. A review of theoretical virtues in science debate. Metascience 28, 261–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00410-4

Download citation