Skip to main content

In defence of dialogue

Yves Gingras: Science and religion: an impossible dialogue. Maiden, MA: Polity Books, July 2017, 272p, $26.95 PB

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aanen, Duur, René Fransen, and Gijsbert van den Brink, eds. 2018. The Leiden Declaration on Evolution and Religion. https://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2018/988/extra.pdf, https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Chair-groups/Plant-Sciences/Laboratory-of-Genetics/Leiden-Declaration-on-Evolution-and-Religion.htm.

  2. Barbour, Ian G. 1997. Religion and Science. Historical and Contemporary Issues. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, Christian. 2004. Barbour’s Way(s) of Relating Science and Theology. In Fifty Years in Science and Religion. Ian G. Barbour and his Legacy, ed. Robert John Russell, 61–75. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, Robin. 2012. The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Cosmos. In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, ed. William Lane Craig and J.P. Moreland, 202–281. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Draper, John William. 1874. History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science. New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison, Peter. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruse, Michael, and E.O. Wilson. 1985. The Evolution of Ethics. New Scientist 108: 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Torrance, Andrew B. 2017. Should a Christian Adopt Methodological Naturalism? Zygon 52: 691–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van den Brink, Gijsbert. 2017. En de aarde bracht voort. Christelijk geloof en evolutie [And the Earth Brought Forth. Christian Faith and Evolution]. Utrecht: Boekencentrum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gijsbert van den Brink.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van den Brink, G. In defence of dialogue. Metascience 28, 221–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00404-2

Download citation