Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 389–394 | Cite as

The aesthetics of evolution

Evelleen Richards: Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017, xxxiii+669pp, $47.50 HB
  • Erika Lorraine Milam
Symposium
  • 73 Downloads

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely.

All art is quite useless.

— Oscar Wilde (1891), The Picture of Dorian Gray

To say that Charles Darwin is a touchstone of modern evolutionary theory is to seriously understate his importance in the pantheon of contemporary scientific heroes. Since at least the 1959 centennial celebrations of On the Origin of Species, biologists have repeatedly returned to Darwin’s publications to legitimate their own ideas through his imprimatur (Smocovitis 1999). Biographical accounts of his life and theories thus provide fertile ground for emphasizing different aspects of his oeuvre, yielding a vast array of lessons—not all of them consistent—for how we should understand his intellectual investment in abolition, barnacles, coral reefs, dimorphism, earthworms, finches, geology, horticulture, and more. In Evelleen Richards’ new account of the...

References

  1. Bowler, Peter J. 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, Janet. 1996. Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hamlin, Kimberly A. 2014. From Eve to Evolution: Darwin, Science, and Women’s Rights in Gilded Age America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Largent, Mark. 2009. The So-Called Eclipse of Darwinism. Descended From Darwin: Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 99: 3–21.Google Scholar
  5. Mayr, Ernst. 1985. Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2010. Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Evolutionary Biology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Prum, Richard. 2017. The Evolution of Beauty: How Darwin’s Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Natural World—And Us. New York: DoubleDay.Google Scholar
  8. Qureshi, Sadiah. 2011. Peoples on Parade: Exhibitions, Empire, and Anthropology in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roughgarden, Joan. 2009. The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ruse, Michael. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Russett, Cynthia Eagle. 1989. Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, Jonathan. 2006. Charles Darwin and Victorian Visual Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1999. The 1959 Darwinian Centennial Celebration in America. Commemorations of Scientific Grandeur. Osiris 14: 274–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilde, Oscar. 1891. The Picture of Dorian Gray. New York: Ward, Lock.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History DepartmentPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations