Must philosophy be constrained?

Edouard Machery: Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 217pp, £40.00HB

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alston, William. 1993. Epistemic desiderata. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53(3): 527–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Cruz, Helen. 2015. Where philosophical intuitions come from. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93(2): 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feigenson, Lisa, Stanislas Dehaene, and Elizabeth Spelke. 2004. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(7): 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hale, Bob. 2013. Necessary beings. An essay on ontology and modality and the relations between them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs 34(1): 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Machery, Eduard, Ron Mallon, Sean Nichols, and Steven Stich. 2004. Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition 92(3): B1–B12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Machery, Edouard, Stephen Stich, David Rose, Amita Chatterjee, Kaori Karasawa, Noel Struchiner, Smita Sirker, Naoki Usui, and Takaaki Hashimoto. 2015. Gettier across cultures. Noûs 51(3): 645–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nado, Jennifer. 2014. Why intuition? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89(1): 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paul, Laurie Ann, and Edward Jonathan Hall. 2013. Causation: a user’s guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peacocke, Christopher. 1999. Being known. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2004. The mind incarnate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spirtes, Peter, Clark N. Glymour, and Richard Scheines. 2000. Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sytsma, Justin, John Livengood, Ryoji Sato, and Mineki Oguchi. 2015. Reference in the land of the rising sun: a cross-cultural study on the reference of proper names. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(2): 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Turri, John. 2013. A conspicuous art: Putting Gettier to the test. Philosophers’ Imprint 12: 1–16.

  15. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Karen Kiil Brøcker for helpful discussions on the book, as well as Edouard Machery for comments on the earlier version of this review. This work was supported by and developed as part of the Sapere Aude Project Intuitions in Science and Philosophy funded by Danish Council for Independent Research (Grant Number DFF 4180-00071).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Drożdżowicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drożdżowicz, A., Saint-Germier, P. & Schindler, S. Must philosophy be constrained?. Metascience 27, 469–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0318-y

Download citation