Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 297–300 | Cite as

Can Homo erectus put an end to Chomsky’s mechanistic metaphysics?

Daniel L. Everett: How language began: The story of humanity’s greatest invention. Liveright Publishing, Norton & Co., 2017, 348 pp, ISBN: 9780871407955, $29.00 HB
  • Gregory Michael Nixon
Book Review
  • 86 Downloads

This should be a watershed book as it effectively demolishes the unwarranted assumptions that support the work of the major linguist of our times, Noam Chomsky. Instead of regarding language as predominantly computation and only secondarily as communication, as Chomsky insists, Daniel Everett offers convincing evidence that language’s main function is to communicate shared meanings within a cultural community, which allows for social learning and cultural creativity.

To demonstrate this, Everett attempts to trace the origin of symbol use, which he sees as the foundation of human language, and he finds it in the distant prehistoric past among the far-travelled species we designate as Homo erectus. In linguistic terminology, Everett defends the constitutive view of language over the designative, preferred by cognitive scientists. After years of refusing to discuss the origin of language, Chomsky in 2002 agreed with the metaphysical speculation that it must have begun as a lucky neural...

References

  1. Bickerton, D. 2000. How protolanguage became language. In The evolutionary emergence of language, ed. C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and J.R. Hurford, 264–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassirer, E. 1944. An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cassirer, E. 1953/1923. The philosophy of symbolic forms, vol 1: Language (trans. R. Manheim). Yale University Press. Original in German, 1923.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, T.W. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. de S. Paulo, F. 2009. “Ele virou um charlatão”, diz Chomsky. Cienza. São Paulo, domingo, 01 de fevereiro de 2009. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/ciencia/fe0102200904.htm.
  6. Everett, D.L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46 (4): 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Everett, D.L. 2012. Language: The cultural tool. NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Everett, D.L. 2017. Dark matter of the mind: The culturally articulated unconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hauser, M., N. Chomsky, and W.T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taylor, C. 2016. The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations