Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 99–101 | Cite as

The crucial role of models in science

Natasha Myers: Rendering life molecular: models, modelers, and excitable matter. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2015, 328pp, $94.95 Cloth, $26.95 PB
  • Sabina Leonelli
Book Review
  • 259 Downloads

The development and use of models as research tools to understand the world continues to fascinate scholars in science and technology studies (STS), and particularly those interested in the dynamics of scientific knowledge production and related scholarship in the history and philosophy of science (HPS). Models are ubiquitous in scientific practice, and yet their sheer diversity of forms and roles dazzles anyone attempting to analyze their epistemic significance and social roles. Moreover, while philosophers have published countless studies of the criteria used by scientists to develop and select models as representations of objects and processes in the world (Frigg and Hartmann 2012), what makes a model or a modeling activity successful among researchers—what makes its results convincing, its use fruitful, and its manipulation satisfying—remains shrouded in mystery. Perhaps the most cryptic aspect of modeling work is its concreteness, which becomes evident when considering cases of...

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the European Research Council Grant award 335925.

References

  1. Brown, James Robert, and Yiftach Fehige. 2016. Thought experiments. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/thought-experiment/.
  2. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colombetti, G. 2014. The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frigg, Roman, and Stephan Hartmann. 2012. Models in science. In The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science/.
  5. Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Toon, A. 2012. Models as make-believe: Imagination, fiction and scientific representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, Exeter Centre for the Study of the Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations