Skip to main content
Log in

Replies to Kristin Andrews’s, Gordon Belot’s, and Patrick Forber’s reviews

Elliott Sober: Ockham’s razors: A user’s manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 322pp, $29.99 PB, $99.99 HB

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • De Waal, F. 1991. Complementary Methods and Convergent Evidence in the Study of Primate Social Cognition. Behaviour 118: 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. 2016. Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisseeff, A., and M. Pontil. 2003. Leave-one-out Error and Stability of Learning Algorithms with Applications. In NATO Science Series Sub Series III: Computer and Systems Sciences, vol. 190, ed. J. Suykens, G. Horvath, S. Basu, C. Micchelli, and J. Vandewalle, 111–130. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. 1965. The Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. 2015. Animal Mindreading—What’s the Problem? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22: 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, M. 1995. Spearman’s Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A., J. Call, and M. Tomasello. 2006. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Conceal Visual and Auditory Information from Others. Journal of Comparative Psychology 120: 154–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrvold, W. 2003. A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification. Philosophy of Science 70: 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. 2009. Causality—Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D.C., and D.J. Povinelli. 2007. On the Lack of Evidence that Non-human Animals Possess Anything Remotely Resembling a ‘Theory of Mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362: 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D.J., and J. Vonk. 2004. We don’t Need a Microscope to Explore the Chimpanzee’s Mind. Mind and Language 19: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 1990. Let’s Razor Ockham’s Razor. In Explanation and Its Limits, ed. D. Knowles, 73–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. 2001. Causation, prediction, and search, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Stone, M. 1977. An Asymptotic Equivalence of Choice of Model by Cross-Validation and Akaike’s Criterion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K. 1976. Distribution of Information Statistics and a Criterion of Model Fitting. Suri-Kagaku (Mathematical Sciences) 153: 12–18 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. 2005. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Dylan Beschoner, Hayley Clatterbuck, Daniel Hausman, Michael Schon, Mike Steel, Olav Vassend, Naftali Weinberger, and Aaron Yarmel for useful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliott Sober.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sober, E. Replies to Kristin Andrews’s, Gordon Belot’s, and Patrick Forber’s reviews. Metascience 25, 393–403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0118-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0118-1

Navigation