, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 43–49 | Cite as

Replies to Creath, Ebbs, and Lavers



  1. Carnap, Rudolf 1932/1959. Elimination of metaphysics through the logical analysis of language, In Logical positivism, ed. A.J. Ayer, 60–81. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, Rudolf 1934/1937. Logical syntax of language (trans: Smeaton, A.). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, Rudolf. 1939. Foundations of logic and mathematics. In International encyclopedia of unified science, ed. O. Neurath, R. Carnap, and C. Morris, 139–214. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. Intellectual autobiography. In The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, ed. P. Schilpp. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Creath, Richard. 1990. Dear Carnap, dear Van. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  6. Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2013. Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  7. Lavers, Gregory (2016). Carnap on abstract and theoretical entities. In Ontology after Carnap, eds. Stephan Blatti and Sandra Lapointe New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mancosu, Paolo. 2004. Harvard 1940–1941: Carnap, Tarski and Quine on a finitistic language of mathematics for science. History and Philosophy of Logic 26: 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Quine, W.V. 1953. Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Quine, W.V. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Quine, W.V. 1976. The ways of paradox and other essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Quine, W.V. 1981. Theories and things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations