This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Another gap is the exclusion of philosophy (apart from bioethics) from multidisciplinary ethical discussion, though Thompson refers at times to philosophical theories (e.g., consequentialism).
The idea of biology and engineering interacting in a “frontier contact zone” is brought up in Chapter 7, but not pursued.
Similarly misleading is the claim that UK is “home to hES derivation” (64)—the key experiments were performed at the University of Wisconsin.
Creager, A., E. Lunbeck, and M.N. Wise (eds). 2007. Science without laws: Model systems, cases, exemplary narratives. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fagan, M.B. 2013. Philosophy of stem cell biology. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Franklin, S. 2007. Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Maienschein, J. 2003. Whose view of life? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Monroe, K., Miller, R., and J. Tobis (eds). 2008. Fundamentals of the stem cell debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Morgan, M., and M. Morrison (eds). 2000. Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, J., J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S. Shapiro, M. Waknitz, J. Swiergel, V. Marshall, and J. Jones. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282: 1145–1147.
Thompson, C. 2005. Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Fagan, M.B. Stem cell lacunae. Metascience 24, 147–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9964-x