Notes
Virginal conception (which seems better wording than “virgin birth”) is logically consistent with the theological claim that Jesus is the son of the Father and, contrary to what Davies says (229), does not imply that sexual intercourse is in itself a sin, according to the Catholic Church. Virginal conception must be carefully kept distinct from immaculate conception, which means that Mary is free of original sin.
References
Cohen, I.B., and R.S. Westfall eds. 1995. Newton, texts, background, commentaries. New York: Norton.
Ghins, M. “Realism”, in Interdisciplinary Encyclopaedia of Religion and Science (http://www.inters.orgm, 2009).
Herivel, J. 1965. The background to Newton’s principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. 1987. The many faces of realism. LaSalle, Ill: The Open Court.
van Fraassen, B. 2002. The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghins, M. Scientific and religious beliefs revisited. Metascience 23, 581–587 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9905-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9905-8