Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific and religious beliefs revisited

Brian Davies: Why beliefs matter. Reflections on the nature of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, x+250 pp, £ 14.99 PB

  • Essay Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Virginal conception (which seems better wording than “virgin birth”) is logically consistent with the theological claim that Jesus is the son of the Father and, contrary to what Davies says (229), does not imply that sexual intercourse is in itself a sin, according to the Catholic Church. Virginal conception must be carefully kept distinct from immaculate conception, which means that Mary is free of original sin.

References

  • Cohen, I.B., and R.S. Westfall eds. 1995. Newton, texts, background, commentaries. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghins, M. “Realism”, in Interdisciplinary Encyclopaedia of Religion and Science (http://www.inters.orgm, 2009).

  • Herivel, J. 1965. The background to Newton’s principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 1987. The many faces of realism. LaSalle, Ill: The Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. 2002. The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Ghins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghins, M. Scientific and religious beliefs revisited. Metascience 23, 581–587 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9905-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9905-8

Navigation