Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness, solidity, and multiple determinations

Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles and William Wimsatt (eds): Characterizing the robustness of science: After the practice turn in philosophy of science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 292. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, 372pp, €149.75 HB

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Calcott, Brett. 2011. Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Biology and Philosophy 26: 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenbaugh, Jay, and Anna Alexandrova. 2011. Buyer beware: Robustness analyses in economics and biology. Biology and Philosophy 26: 757–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, Steven H., and Elliott Sober. 1993. A critical assessment of Levin’s The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology (1966). The Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Jim. 2006. Some varieties of robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klodian Coko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coko, K., Schickore, J. Robustness, solidity, and multiple determinations. Metascience 22, 681–683 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-013-9750-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-013-9750-1

Navigation