References
Bloor, D. 1981. The strengths of the strong programme. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 199–213.
Chang, H. 2009. We have never been Whiggish (about phlogiston). Centaurus 51: 239–264.
Clow, A., and N. Clow. 1952. The chemical revolution: A contribution to social technology. London: Butchwork Press.
Foucault, M. 1973. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (trans. A. Sheridan Smith). New York: Vintage Books.
Gillispie, C.C. 1959. The Encyclopedie and the Jacobin philosophy of science: A study in ideas and consequences. In Critical problems in the history of science, ed. Marshall Clagett, 255–288. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Guerlac, H. 1959. Some French antecedents of the chemical revolution. Chymia 5: 73–113.
Klein, U., and W. Lefèvre. 2007. Materials in eighteenth-century science: A historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lakatos, I. 1970. History of science and its rational reconstructions. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association. Boston studies in the philosophy of science VIII: 91–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bensaude-Vincent, B., Golinski, J., Roberts, L.L. et al. Historiography in a metaphysical mode. Metascience 21, 41–57 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-011-9524-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-011-9524-6