Metascience

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

New perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s The aim and structure of physical theory

  • Anastasios Brenner
  • Paul Needham
  • David J. Stump
  • Robert Deltete
Book Symposium

References

  1. Barbour, Ian. 2000. When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers, or partners. San Francisco: Harper’s.Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn, Simon. 2001. Reason, virtue, and knowledge. In Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility, ed. A. Fairweather, and L. Zagzebski. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Church, Alonzo. 1958. Ontological commitment. Journal of Philosophy 55: 1008–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Draper, John William. 1874. History of the conflict between religion and science. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  5. Duhem, Pierre. 1886. Le potentiel thermodynamique et ses applications à la mécanique chimique et à l’étude des phénomènes électriques. Paris: A. Hermann.Google Scholar
  6. Duhem, Pierre. 1887. Étude sur les travaux thermodynamiqes de M. J. Willard Gibbs. Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques 11: 122–148 and 159–176.Google Scholar
  7. Duhem, Pierre. 1892. Notation atomique et hypothèses atomistiques. Revue des questions scientifiques 31: 391–457 (trans: Paul Needham as ‘Atomic notation and atomistic hypotheses’). Foundations of Chemistry, 2 (2000): 127–180).Google Scholar
  8. Duhem, Pierre. 1892–1894. Commentaire aux principes de la thermodynamique. Première Partie. Journal de Mathématiques Pure et Appliquées 8 (1892): 269–330. Deuxième Partie 9 (1893): 293–359. Troisième Partie 10 (1894): 207–285.Google Scholar
  9. Duhem, Pierre. 1893. Physique et métaphysique. Revue des Questions Scientifiques 34: 55–83.Google Scholar
  10. Duhem, Pierre. 1903. L’évolution de la mécanique. Paris: A. Joanin.Google Scholar
  11. Duhem, Pierre. 1905–1906. Les origines de la statique: Les sources des théories physiques, vols. 2. Paris: A. Herman.Google Scholar
  12. Duhem, Pierre. 1905b. Physique de croyant. Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 155: 44–67. 133–159. Rpt. in Duhem 1914, 413–472.Google Scholar
  13. Duhem, Pierre. 1906. La Théorie physique, son objet, sa structure. Paris, Vrin, (1981); The aim and structure of physical theory (trans: P.P. Wiener). Princeton: Princeton University Press (1954).Google Scholar
  14. Duhem, Pierre. 1914. La théorie physique, son objet—sa structure, 2nd ed. Paris: Chevalier et Rivière.Google Scholar
  15. Duhem, Pierre. 1911. Traité d’énergétique ou de thermodynamique générale. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  16. Duhem, Pierre. 1913. Notice sur les titres et travaux scientifiques. Bordeaux, Gounouilhou; ‘An account of the scientific titles and works of Pierre Duhem’ (partial trans.: Y. Murciano and L. Schramm) Science in Context 1, (1987): 333-348.Google Scholar
  17. Duhem, Pierre. 1991. German science. La Salle, Ill: Open Court.Google Scholar
  18. Duhem, Pierre. 2002. Mixture and chemical combination, and related essays. (translated and edited: Paul Needham). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Greco, John. 2004. Virtue epistemology. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2004 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. URL <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/epistemology-virtue/>.
  20. Feyerabend, P. K. 1962. Explanation, reduction, and empiricism. In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, ed. H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, vol. 3, 28–97.Google Scholar
  21. Ivanova, Milena. 2010. Pierre Duhem’s good sense as a guide to theory choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirchhoff, Gustav Robert. 1876. Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik: Mechanik, 2nd ed. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  23. Kosso, Peter. 1988. Dimensions of observability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kosso, Peter. 1989. Observability and observation in physical sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. Kragh, Helge. 2008. Pierre Duhem, entropy, and Christian faith. Physics in Perspective 10: 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lecourt, Dominique. 2008. Georges Canguilhem. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  28. Le Roy, Édouard. 1899–1900. Science et philosophie. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 7: 375-425, 501–562, 708–731; & 8: 37–72.Google Scholar
  29. Milhaud, Gaston. 1898. Le rationnel. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  30. Needham, Paul. 1996. Substitution: Duhem’s explication of a chemical paradigm. Perspectives on Science 4: 408–433.Google Scholar
  31. Needham, Paul. 1998. Duhem’s physicalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Needham, Paul. 2000. Duhem and Quine. Dialectica 54: 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Needham, Paul. 2004. When did atoms begin to do any explanatory work in chemistry? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8: 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Needham, Paul. 2008a. Is water a mixture?—Bridging the distinction between physical and chemical properties. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Needham, Paul. 2008b. Resisting chemical atomism: Duhem’s argument. Philosophy of Science 75: 921–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rey, Abel. 1904. La philosophie scientifique de M. Duhem. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 12: 699–744.Google Scholar
  37. Rey, Abel. 1907. La théorie de la physique chez les physiciens contemporains. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  38. Stump, David J. 2007. Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Worrall, John. 1982. Scientific realism and scientific change. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 201–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasios Brenner
    • 1
  • Paul Needham
    • 2
  • David J. Stump
    • 3
  • Robert Deltete
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPaul Valéry University-Montpellier IIIMontpellier cedex 5France
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Department of PhilosophySeattle UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations