A new perspective on objectivity and conventionalism

Talal A. Debs, Michael L. G. Redhead: Objectivity, invariance and convention: symmetry in physical science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007, pp. ix + 194. £24.95, €34.00, US$39.35

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    The authors thank Alana Yu for invaluable comments on the structure and style of the paper.


  1. Bueno, O. 1997. Empirical adequacy: A partial structures approach. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 28: 585–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Candlish, S., and G. Wrisley. 2007. Private language. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, E.N. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/private-language/.

  3. Dorato, M., and L. Felline. 2010. Structural explanations in Minkowski spacetime: Which accounts of models? In Space, time, and spacetime—physical and philosophical implications of Minkowski's unification of space and time, ed. V. Petkov. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janis, A.I. 1983. Simultaneity and conventionality. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis, ed. R.S. Cohen, and L. Laudan, 101–110. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Redhead, M.L.G. 1993. The conventionality of simultaneity. In Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grunbaum, ed. J. Earman, A.I. Janis, G.J. Massey, and N. Rescher, 103–128. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Redhead, M.L.G. 2001. The intelligibility of the universe. In Philosophy at the new millennium, ed. A. O’Hear, 73–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antigone M. Nounou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nounou, A.M., Dorato, M., Lutz, S. et al. A new perspective on objectivity and conventionalism. Metascience 19, 3–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9321-7

Download citation