Skip to main content
Log in

Features of Morphology of Carbide Banding of High-Carbon Steels with Bulat Structure

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

The main structural differences between the 18th century Persian Bulat knife and the modern knife made of Kh (ShKh15) type bearing steel are considered. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carbide banding of high-carbon steels manufactured using Damascus steel technologies have been established. The nature of carbide banding is described in detail based on the shape of the planar projection lines of Bulat (Damascus) structure. Studies have confirmed that the matrix structure of tempered martensite and lamellar troostite is isometric and is not oriented in the direction of deformation. The carbide structure of steels manufactured using Damascus steel technologies is strongly oriented in the direction of deformation. It is calculated that the degree of orientation of linear elements in the two-dimensional metallographic specimen plane approaches unity. The regular layered banding (score 4) patterns are consistent with the structure of the Eastern genuine Damascus steels having an increased content of phosphorus admixture (0.1–0.3% P). The Damascus structure of alloyed tool steels is characterized by uneven reticular-fibrous carbide banding patterns (score 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. P. Anosov, “On Damascus steels,” Gornyi Zhurnal, Book 2, part 1, 157–317 (1841).

  2. N. T. Belyaev, On Damascus Steels [in Russian], Typolitography of St. Petersburg prison, St. Petersburg (1906).

  3. B. Zschokke, Du Damasse et des Lamés de Damast, Rev. de Metallurgie, 21, 635–669 (1924).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. S. Gaev, “Bulat and modern iron-carbon alloys,” Metalloved. i Term. Obrab. Metallov, No. 9, 17–24 (1965).

  5. Cl. Panseri, “Damascus steel in legend and in reality,” Gladius, No. 4, 5–66 (1965).

  6. O. D. Sherby and J. Wadsworth, “Damascus steel.” Scientific American, 252 (2), 112–120 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Wadsworth and O. D. Sherby, “On the Bulat — Damascus steels revisited,” Progress in Materials Science, 25, 35–68 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. N. Tavadze, B. G. Amaglobeli, and G. V. Inanishvili, “On the issue of studying Bulat steel,” Soobshcheniya AN Gruz. SSR, No. 3 (115), 589–592 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. D. Verhoeven, A. H. Pendray, and E. D. Gibson, “Wootz-Damascus steel blades,” Materials Characterization, 37, 9–22 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Verhoeven, A. N. Pendray, and W. E. Dauksch, “The key role of impurities in ancient Damascus steel blades,” J. of Metallurgy, 50, 58–64 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. D. Verhoeven, “Pattern formation in wootz Damascus steel swords and blades,” Indian Journal of History of Science, 42 (2), 559–574 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. M. Feuerbach, “ Damascus steel and crucible steel in Central Asia,” American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin, 82, 33–42 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Levin, D. C. Meyer, M. Reibold, W. Kochmann, N. Pätzke, and P. Paufler, “ Microstructure of a genuine Damascus sabre,” Cryst. Res. Technol., No. 9(40), 905–916 (2005).

  14. M. R. Barnett, A. Sullivan, and R. Balasubramaniam, “ Electron backscattering diffraction analysis of an ancient wootz steel blade from Central India,” Materials Characterization, 60, 252–260 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. N. Taganov and B. D. Kalinin, “ The effect of phosphorus impurity on Bulat technology,” Metalloobrabotka, No. 2 (50), 40–46 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Schastlivtsev, V. N. Urtsev, A. V. Shmakov, V. N. Degtyarev, A. Ya. Nakonechnyi, Ye. D. Mokshin, and I. L. Yakovleva, “Bulat structure,” Fizika Metallov i Metallovedeniya, No. 7(114), 650–657 (2013).

  17. D. Ghasem, “An archaeometallurgical investigation of a steel sword from the Safavid dynasty,” The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (JOM), No. 2(70), 243–247 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. V. Tumanova, V. Yu. Bazhin, O. A. Dubovikov, A. V. Sundurov, and V. G. Povarov, “ A study of 19th century Georgian Bulat weapons from the collection of the mining museum of the mining university,” Chernye Metally, No. 2, 73–78 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. Sukhanov, “Influence of phosphorus impurity on the structure and nature of the destruction of the genuine Damascus steel,” Intern. J. of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, No. 5 (4), 26–37 (2018).

  20. D. A. Sukhanov and N. V. Plotnikova, “ Mechanical properties of 18th century Persian Bulat steel in comparison with modern tool steels,” Metallurg, No. 11, 50–60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. A. Sukhanov, “Topographic contour element features in patterned macrostructures of the 18th century Persian Bulat steel,” Metallurg, No. 2, 93–102 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. A. Sukhanov, “Structural and fractographic features of 18th century Bulat knife blade fractures with impact bending,” Metallurg, No. 4, 99–107 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. A. Sukhanov, “ Behavioral features of the 18th century Persian Bulat steel and modern Damascus steel under cyclic loading,” Metallurg, No. 6, 94–102 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. A. Sukhanov, “Reconstruction of genuine Damascus structure of the 18th century eastern Pulvar saber blade,” Metallurg, No. 11, 115–124 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Saltykov, Stereometric Metallography [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. P. Vinogradov, “Soft Damascus steel and the origin of the Damascus pattern,” Izv. Dnepropetr. Gorn. Inst., 15, 115–213 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. N. Golikov, Dendritic Liquation in Steel [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Moscow (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  28. O. D. Sherby, T. Oyama, D. W. Kum, B. Walser, and J. Wadsworth, “Ultrahigh carbon steels,” J. of Metals, No. 6, 50–56 (1985).

  29. E. M. Taleff, B. L. Bramfitt, C. K. Syn, D. R. Lesuer, J. Wadsworth, and O. D. Sherby, “ Processing, structure, and properties of a rolled, UHC steel plate exhibiting a Damask pattern,” Materials Characterization, 46, 11–18 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Sunada, J. Wadsworth, J. Lin, and O. D. Sherby, “ Mechanical properties and microstructure of heat-treated ultrahigh carbon steels,” Mater. Sci. and Eng., 38, 35–40 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Sukhanov.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 103–111, January, 2023. Russian https://doi.org/10.52351/00260827_2023_01_103

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukhanov, D.A. Features of Morphology of Carbide Banding of High-Carbon Steels with Bulat Structure. Metallurgist 67, 111–122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-023-01498-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-023-01498-0

Keywords

Navigation