, Volume 61, Issue 11–12, pp 1033–1037 | Cite as

Correlating Hardness and Welding Dilution with the Abrasion Mass Loss of Hardfacings Welded with Different Currents and Polarities

  • Hein Zaw Oo
  • B. Srikarun
  • P. Muangjunburee

The correlation of hardness, microstructure, and dilution with the abrasion mass loss of hardfaced samples deposited using different currents (500 and 600 A) and polarities (AC and DC+) was studied. Four different welding conditions were considered for submerged arc welding using a martensitic hardfacing electrode and austenitic buffer electrode. Single-layer hardfacing was applied over the single-layer buffer. The microstructure of hardfacing was observed by an optical microscope. The micro-Vickers hardness across a single-layer hardfacing and dilution percentage were also measured. A dry-sand–rubber wheel abrasion test was conducted according to ASTM G65 procedure A to record the abrasive mass loss of the samples. The use of higher current and DC+ polarity resulted in the highest mass loss because of the deepest dilution and lowest hardness. Dilution affects the hardness and microstructure of hardfacing. The lowest abrasive mass loss, shallowest dilution, and highest hardness were obtained for the sample welded with lower current and AC polarity.


hardfacing martensitic austenitic buffer welding dilution submerged arc welding 



This work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and the Thailand’s Education Hub for Southern Region of ASEAN Countries Project Offi ce of the Higher Education Commission. The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus, Thailand for supporting equipment, and the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Mae Moh Lignite Mine, Thailand for some data of this research.


  1. 1.
    A. Saha and S. C. Mondal, “Multi-objective optimization of manual metal arc welding process parameters for nano-structured hardfacing material using hybrid approach,” Measurement, 102, 80–89 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. G. Budinski and S. T. Budinski, “On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing,” Wear, 376, 1859–1865 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Wang, X. Li, Y. Chang, S. Han, and H. Dong, “Comparison of three-body impact abrasive wear behaviors for quenching–partitioning–tempering and quenching–tempering 20Si2Ni3 steels,” Wear, 362, 121–128 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Correa, N. Alcântara, L. Valeriano, et al., “The effect of microstructure on abrasive wear of a Fe–Cr–C–Nb hardfacing alloy deposited by the open arc welding process,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 276, 479–484 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Yüksel and S. Şahin, “Wear behavior–hardness microstructure relation of Fe–Cr–C and Fe–Cr–C–B based hardfacing alloys,” Mater. Des., 58, 491–498 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Wang, F. Han, and S. Qu, “Microstructure of the Fe-based hardfacing layers reinforced by TiC–VC–Mo2C particles,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 202, No. 8, 1502–1509 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Society for Metals, Welding, Brazing and Soldering: Metals Handbook, Metals Park, Ohio (1983), 9th ed., Vol. 6, p. 2873.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Bendikiene and L. Kavaliauskiene, “The effect of plastic deformation rate on the wear performance of hardfaced coatings,” Weld. World, 61, No. 5, 1–8 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. H. Bulloch and J. L. Henderson, “Some considerations of wear and hardfacing materials,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 46, No. 3, 251–267 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Morsy and E. El-Kashif, “The effect of microstructure on high-stress abrasion resistance of Fe–Cr–C hardfacing deposits,” Weld. World, 58, No. 4, 491–497 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Fang, Y. Chen, Z. Yang, et al., “Cable-type welding wire submerged arc surfacing,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 249, 25–31 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Kirchgaßner, E. Badisch, and F. Franek “Behaviour of iron-based hardfacing alloys under abrasion and impact,” Wear, 265, No. 5–6, 772–779 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Li, and C. Li, “Effect of carbonitride precipitates on the abrasive wear behaviour of hardfacing alloy,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 254, No. 16, 5023–5027 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Chatterjee and T. K. Pal, “Weld procedural effect on the performance of iron based hardfacing deposits on cast iron substrate,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 173, No. 1, 61–69 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. C. Crespo, A. Scotti, and M. R. Pérez, “Operational behavior assessment of coated tubular electrodes for SMAW hardfacing,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 199, No. 1, 265–273 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. L. Tsai, Y. S. Tarng, and C. M. Tseng, “Optimisation of submerged arc welding process parameters in hardfacing,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 12, No. 6, 402–406 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Siva, N. Murugan, and R. Logesh, “Optimization of weld bead geometry in plasma transferred arc hardfaced austenitic stainless-steel plates using genetic algorithm,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 41, No. 1, 24–30 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Marimuthu and N. Murugan, “Prediction and optimisation of weld bead geometry of plasma transferred arc hardfaced valve seat rings,” Surf. Eng., 19, No. 2, 143–149 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM International, G65-16: Standard Test Method for Measuring Abrasion Using the Dry Sand/Rubber Wheel, ASTM Standards 04 (2013), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Wang, F. Han, and S. Qu, “Microstructure of the Fe-based hardfacing layers reinforced by TiC–VC–Mo 2 C particles,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 202, No. 8, 1502–1509 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringPrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand

Personalised recommendations