Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Characteristics of Retained Austenite in 0.362C–1.38Si–1.24Mn Steel Processed by One-Step Quenching and Partitioning

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

The microstructure and morphology of retained austenite are effective parameters in the mechanism of plasticity enhancement in quenching and partitioning steels. This study focused on the identification of morphological features of retained austenite through scanning electron microscopy, field emission-scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffractometry, and transmission electron microscopy in a onestep quenched and partitioned C–Mn–Si steel. Retained austenite of different sizes and shapes (island-like and film-like) and martensite with lath-type morphology were observed at all partitioning times. Cementitecarbide (Fe3C) precipitates with a dominant spherical shape and average submicron size were also characterized in samples that had been partitioned for longer times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. G. Speer, D. K. Matlock, B. C. De Cooman, and J. G. Schroth, “Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation,” Acta Mater., 51, 2611 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Wang and J. G. Speer, “Quenching and partitioning steel heat treatment,” Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., 2, 268 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, and J. Sietsma, “Microstructural evolution of a low-carbon steel during application of quenching and partitioning heat treatments after partial austenitization,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 40, 46 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. De Moor, S. Lacroix, L. Samek, et al., “Dilatometric study of the quench and partitioning process,” 3rd Int. Conf. on Advanced Structural Steels, Gyeongju, Korea (2006).

  5. B. V. N. Rao and G. Thomas, “Structure-property relations and the design of Fe–4Cr–C base structural steels for high strength and toughness,” Metall. Trans. A, 11, 441 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. D. Wang, B. X. Huang, Y. H. Rong, and L. Wang, “Mechanical and transformation behaviors of a C–Mn–Si–Al–Cr TRIP steel under stress,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 22, 625 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, R. Petrov, and J. Sietsma, “Characterization of the microstructure obtained by the quenching and partitioning process in a low-carbon steel,” Mater. Charact., 59, 1758 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, and J. Sietsma, “Microstructural evolution of a low-carbon steel during application of quenching and partitioning heat treatments after partial austenitization,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 40, 46 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, R. Petrov, and J. Sietsma, “Characterization of the microstructure obtained by the quenching and partitioning process in a low-carbon steel,” Mater. Charact., 59, 1758 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Y. Li, X. W. Lu, X. C. Wu, et al., “Bainitic transformation during the two-step quenching and partitioning process in a medium carbon steel containing silicon,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 6255 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Mahieu, J. Maki, B. C. De Cooman, and S. Claessens, “Phase transformation and mechanical properties of Si-free CMnAl transformation-induced plasticity-aided steel,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 33, 2573 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. R. Ghazvinloo and A. Honarbakhsh-Raouf, “Effect of partitioning time on microstructural evolution of C-Mn-Si steel in one-step quenching and partitioning process,” J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 6, 22 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. X. D. Wang, Z. H. Guo, and Y. H. Rong, “Mechanism exploration of an ultrahigh strength steel by quenching–partitioning–tempering process,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 529, 35 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, and J. Sietsma, “Overview of mechanisms involved during the quenching and partitioning process in steels,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 42, 3620 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. De Moor, S. Lacroix, A. J. Clarke, et al., “Effect of retained austenite stabilized via quench and partitioning on the strain hardening of martensitic steels,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 39, 2586 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. R. Ghazvinloo, A. Honarbakhsh-Raouf, and A. R. Kiani Rashid, “Mechanical properties of a high Si and Mn steel heat treated by one-step quenching and partitioning,” Metallurgist, 59, 90 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Soppa, D. Willer, and D. Kuppler, “EBSD- and TEM-investigations of microstructure in the austenitic steel X6CrNiNb18-10 under cyclic loading,” 38th MPA-Seminar, Oct. 1–2, 2012, Stuttgart.

  18. M. J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, R. Petrov, et al., “Microstructural development during the quenching and partitioning process in a newly designed low-carbon steel,” Acta Mater., 59, 6059 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. R. Ghazvinloo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghazvinloo, H.R., Honarbakhsh-Raouf, A. & Borhani, E. Morphological Characteristics of Retained Austenite in 0.362C–1.38Si–1.24Mn Steel Processed by One-Step Quenching and Partitioning. Metallurgist 60, 758–764 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-016-0363-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-016-0363-y

Keywords

Navigation