Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laboratory Complex for Modeling Production Operations in the Rolling of Plates

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

The essence of the two main methods of modeling processes – mathematical modeling and physical modeling – is examined in survey form along with each method’s advantages and disadvantages. Information is provided on the laboratory complex Termodeform MGTU, which was created to develop and study new chemical compositions for low-alloy steels and regimes for their hot rolling. A brief description is given of the characteristics of the main equipment of the lab complex and its research potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. M. Salganik, A. M. Pesin, D. N. Chikishev, et al., “Modeling the stress–strain state of steel plates formed in the rolling of continuous-cast slabs with surface cracks,” Chern. Metally, No. 12, 15–18 (2012).

  2. G. Kunitsin, A. Pesin, V. Salganik, et al., “Research and modeling of transverse metal flow during cold rolling of narrow strip,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Materials Processing Technology MART'2000, Phuket, Thailand, pp. 128–133.

  3. V. M. Salganik, S. V. Denisov, D. N. Chikishev, et al., “Improving the rolling of plates of microalloyed steels of different strength classes based on dilatometric studies,” Proizv. Prokata, No. 5, 5–8 (2011).

  4. I. A. Selivanov, I. G. Gun, V. M. Salganik, et al., “Study of the control systems of a continuous mill by using a mathematical model,” Vestn. Magnitogor. Gos. Tekh. Univ., No. 3, 11–14 (2011).

  5. M. V. Chukin, A. G. Korchunov, and M. A. Polyakova, “Developing an algorithm for control of the structure and properties of nanostructured carbon steels,” Stal, No. 10, 76–81 (2012).

  6. A. G. Korchunov, M. V. Chukin, M. A. Polyakova, et al., “Criterional evaluation of the effectiveness of processes for the high-rate plastic deformation of carbon structural steels,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Chern. Metall., No. 2, 46–51 (2013).

  7. A. Korchunov, M. Chukin, N. Koptseva, et al., “Forming of nanodimentional structure parts in carbon steel,” Int. Conf. on Materials Sciences and Mechanical Engineering ICMSME'2012, Bangkok, December 2012, Iss. 72, Part XI, pp. 1116–1119.

  8. M. V. Chukin, N. V. Koptseva, and O. A. Nikitenko, “Use of the software ThixometPRO for quantitative analysis of the ultradispersed structure of low- and medium-carbon steel subjected to equal-channel angular pressing,” MiTOM, No. 8, 12–17 (2012).

  9. N. V. Koptseva, M. V. Chukin, M. P. Baryshnikov, and G. S. Gun, “Physical modeling of rheological properties and dilatometric studies in the solution of applied problems concerning the treatment of promising steels and alloys,” Proc. 9th Congr. Rolling-Mill Operators, Cherepovets (2013), pp. 309–319.

  10. M. V. Chukin and A. V. Mokhnatkin, “Creation of a theoretical–experimental algorithm for calculating the reserve ductility of structural steels in multi-stage metal-forming operations,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved Chern. Metall., No. 11, 11–14 (2011).

  11. N. V. Koptseva, M. V. Chukin, O. A. Nikitenko, and Yu. Yu. Efimova, “Mechanical properties of carbon structural steel with an ultrafine-grained structure,” Chern. Metally, Spec. Iss., 54–59 (2011).

  12. V. M. Salganik, D. N. Ch9ikishev, A. M. Pesin, et al., “Developing an efficient system for the rough rolling of low-alloy steels,” Stal, No. 9, 50–52 (2008).

  13. A. Piesin, V. Salganik, D. Chikishev, et al., “Asymmetric rolling: theory and technology,” Hutnik – Wiadom. Hutn., LXXIX, No. 5, 358–362 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Salganik, A. Pesin, D. Chikishev, et al., “Theoretical basis and technology development of the combined process of asymmetric rolling and plastic bending,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Mechanical Engineering and Technology ICMET'2011, ASME Press, New York, U.S. (2011), pp. 95–99.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

    V. M. Salganik, P. P. Poletskov & D. N. Chikishev

  2. Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Combine, Magnitogorsk, Russia

    S. V. Denisov & P. A. Stekanov

Authors
  1. V. M. Salganik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. P. Poletskov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. N. Chikishev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. V. Denisov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. A. Stekanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. P. Poletskov or S. V. Denisov.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, No. 10, pp. 81–84, October, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salganik, V.M., Poletskov, P.P., Chikishev, D.N. et al. Laboratory Complex for Modeling Production Operations in the Rolling of Plates. Metallurgist 58, 921–925 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-015-0018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-015-0018-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation