Abstract
This article aims at describing the tensions arising from working on and with someone in psychiatry, in order to make this person more “autonomous”. First, through the example of the recovery, it acknowledges, the normative horizon of what is considered today as “good care”: a negotiation between partners, aiming at increasing the possibilities for everyone to follow their own lifestyle. It then seeks to describe how this definition of good care is endorsed and applied in two institutions (in Belgium and in France) hosting people with severe mental health issues where the care teams are using three words (“contract”, “project” and “autonomy”). The article analyses the difficulties encountered while putting into practice these demanding ideals and shows how and to what end the care teams take action in defining the “good” projects and, in a more general way, what patients can or should expect from themselves and from their future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Systemic psychotherapy implies working not at the level of the individual, but at the level of the relational system in which the patient evolves.
In this article, people being treated for mental health issues and staying in institutions, where the fieldwork has been done, will be called “patient” or “resident” to apply the indigenous terms used within the institutions where the study was done. This designation is in no way a value judgement.
The author would like to sincerely thank the two anonymous reviewers of Culture, medicine and psychiatry as well as Nicolas Henckes for their useful comments on previous versions of this paper.
Even if the movements of the institutional psychotherapy are advocating such ideas for a while (cf. Clinique de La Borde, etc.), their perspective mainly stayed dissenting..
For a very clear example of this consequence, see the way the CRPD was included into the Brussels law, in the decree “Inclusion” (Marquis 2015).
The role of the caregivers can maybe include helping with formalizing decisions to be made (what do I really want to do?) and assessing these decisions (what are the conditions to make it happen?), with tools such as the CASIG (Client Assessment of Strengths lnterests and Goals) scale, for example.
Comité d’Evaluation Ethique de l’INSERM (IRB00003888, n° 15-268, France) and Comité d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire (CEHF) UCL-Saint-Luc (IRB00001530, 2016/10FEV/046, Belgium).
References
Adams, Jared R., Robert E. Drake, and George L. Wolford (2007) Shared Decision-Making Preferences of People with Severe Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services 58(9): 1219-1221.
Austin, John Langshaw (1975) How to Do Things with Words, Vol. 88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, Robert J. The Psychiatric Team and the Social Definition of Schizophrenia: an Anthropological Study of Person and Illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Blanc, Alain. Sociologie du handicap. Éditeur: Armand Colin, 2012.
Bloor, M. J. Social Control in the Therapeutic Community: Re‐examination of a Critical Case. Sociology of Health & Illness 8.4 (1986): 305-324.
Bloor, Michael J., and Neil P. McKeganey (1986) Conceptions of Therapeutic Work in Therapeutic Communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 6(3): 68-79.
Bloor, Michael, Neil P. McKeganey, and Dick Fonkert. One Foot in Eden: a Sociological Study of the Range of Therapeutic Community Practice. London: Routledge, 1988.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Méditations Pascaliennes. Paris: Le Seuil, 1997.
Brodwin, Paul. Everyday Ethics: Voices from the Front Line of Community Psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.
Campling, Penelope, and Rex Haigh, eds. Therapeutic Communities: Past, Present and Future. Vol. 2. Chichester: Wiley, 1999.
Coleman, Ron, and Mike Smith. Working with Voices. London, UK: Keepwell, 2002.
Corin, Ellen E. (1990) Facts and Meaning in Psychiatry An Anthropological Approach to the Lifeworld of Schizophrenics. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 14(2): 153-188.
Crossley, Michele L., and Nick Crossley. (2001) Patients’ Voices, Social Movements and the Habitus; How Psychiatric Survivors ‘Speak Out. Social Science & Medicine 52(10): 1477-1489.
Crossley, Nick. Contesting Psychiatry: Social Movements in Mental Health. London: Routledge, 2006.
Davidson L, Rakfeldt J, Strauss JS, éds. The Roots of the Recovery Movement in Psychiatry: Lessons Learned. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Delmar, Charlotte. (2012) ‘The Excesses of Care: a Matter of Understanding the Asymmetry of Power’. Nursing Philosophy,13(4): 236-243.
Douglas, Mary. Evans-Pritchard. London: Routledge, 2010.
Douglas, Mary. How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1986.
Drake, Robert E. and Patricia E. Deegan (2015) Shared Decision Making is an Ethical Imperative. Psychiatric Services, 60(8), 1007.
Ehrenberg, Alain 2005 La plainte sans fin. Réflexions sur le couple souffrance psychique/santé mentale. Cahiers de recherche sociologique 41-42: 17-41.
Ehrenberg, Alain. La société du malaise. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2010.
Ehrenberg, Alain. La Mécanique des passions: Cerveau, comportement, société. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2018.
Ehrenberg, Alain, and Anne Lovell 2001 La Maladie mentale en mutation: Psychiatrie et société. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Estroff, Sue E. Making it crazy: An ethnography of psychiatric clients in an American community. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
Floersch, Jerry. Meds, money, and manners: The case management of severe mental illness. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
Foucault, Michel 2014 (1961) Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris: Gallimard.
Gale, John, Alba Realpe, and Enrico Pedriali, eds. Therapeutic communities for psychosis: Philosophy, history and clinical practice. London: Routledge, 2013.
Goffman, Erving 2017 (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. London: Routledge.
Hamann, Johannes, Stephan Leucht, and Werner Kissling (2003) Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107(6): 403-409.
Jacobson, Nora, and Dianne Greenley (2001) What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatric Services 52(4): 482-485.
Kreyenbuhl, Julie, Ilana R. Nossel, and Lisa B. Dixon (2009) Disengagement from mental health treatment among individuals with schizophrenia and strategies for facilitating connections to care: a review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35(4): 696-703.
Lovell, Anne M., Aurélien Troisoeufs, and Marion Mora (2009) Du handicap psychique aux paradoxes de sa reconnaissance: éléments d’un savoir ordinaire des personnes vivant avec un trouble psychique grave. Revue française des affaires sociales 1: 209-227.
Manning, Nick. The therapeutic community movement: Charisma and routinisation. London: Routledge, 1989.
Marquis, Nicolas 2018 La résilience comme attitude face au malheur: succès et usages des ouvrages de Boris Cyrulnik. In SociologieS.
Marquis, Nicolas (2015) Le handicap, révélateur des tensions de l’autonomie. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 74(1): 109-130.
Marquis, Nicolas. Du bien-être au marché du malaise. La société du développement personnel. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2014.
Massé, Gérard. Pour une réhabilitation psychosociale à la française. L’information psychiatrique 82.4 (2006): 291-296.
Morrison, Linda J. Talking back to psychiatry: The psychiatric consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement. London: Routledge, 2013.
Ogien, Albert. Le raisonnement psychiatrique. Essai de socioanalytique. Paris: Méridiens-Klincksieck, 1989.
Oury, Jean. Psychiatrie et psychothérapie institutionnelle. Paris: Champ social Editions, 2001.
Pachoud, Bernard. Se rétablir de troubles psychiatriques: un changement de regard sur le devenir des personnes. L’information psychiatrique 88.4 (2012): 257-266.
Pachoud, Bernard (2018) La perspective du rétablissement: un tournant paradigmatique en santé mentale. Les Cahiers du Centre Georges Canguilhem 7(1):165-180.
Pols, Jeannette. (2003) Enforcing patient rights or improving care? The interference of two modes of doing good in mental health care. Sociology of Health & Illness 25(4): 320-347.
Potter, Jonathan (2001) Wittgenstein and Austin. In: M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (pp. 39–48). London: Sage.
Ravaud, Jean-François, and Henri-Jacques Stiker (2000) Les modèles de l’inclusion et de l’exclusion à l’épreuve du handicap. Handicap 86:1-18.
Rhodes, Lorna A. Emptying beds: The work of an emergency psychiatric unit. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Romme, Marius AJ, and Alexandre D. Escher (1989) Hearing voices. Schizophrenia Bulletin 15(2): 209-216.
Sass, Louis A. The paradoxes of delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the schizophrenic mind. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.
Sassolas, Marcel. La psychose à rebrousse-poil. Paris: Erès, 2009.
Schütz, Alfred. Le chercheur et le quotidien. Paris: Meridiens-Klincksieck, 1987.
Sharp, Victor. Social control in the therapeutic community. Brooksville: Saxon House, 1975.
Sicot, François. La maladie mentale, quel objet pour la sociologie? Déviance et société 30(2) (2006): 203-232.
Strauss, Anselm, Léonard Schatzman, Danuta Ehrlich, Rue Bucher et Melvin Sabshin. Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions. New York: Free Press, 1964.
Tarot, Camille (1999) De Durkheim à Mauss, l’invention du symbolique. Paris: La Découverte.
Théry, Irène. (2003). La notion de division par sexes chez Marcel Mauss. L’Année sociologique, 53(1), 33-54.
Troisoeufs, Aurélien. (2009) La personne intermédiaire. Hopital psychiatrique et Groupe d’entraide mutuelle. Terrain. Anthropologie & sciences humaines 52: 96-111.
Turner, Victor, Roger D. Abrahams, and Alfred Harris. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge, 2017.
Velpry, Livia. Le quotidien de la psychiatrie: sociologie de la maladie mentale. Paris: Armand Colin, 2008.
Winnicott, Donald W. Play and reality. London: Tavistock Publication, 1971.
Wittgenstein Ludwig. Recherches philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard, 2010.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (Grant Number PIEF-GA-2013-624697).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This research was funded by a FP7 Marie-Curie Actions Grant (PIED-GA-2013-624697) awarded to Nicolas Marquis. Nicolas Marquis declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research was approved by the Comité d’Evaluation Ethique de l’Inserm (France, avis n°15-268), and by the Comité d’Ethique UCL-Saint-Luc (Belgium, avis 2016/10fev/046). This article does not contain any studies with animals.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marquis, N. Making People Autonomous: A Sociological Analysis of the Uses of Contracts and Projects in the Psychiatric Care Institutions. Cult Med Psychiatry 46, 248–276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-019-09624-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-019-09624-x