Humanity at the Edge: The Moral Laboratory of Feeding Precarious Lives
- 577 Downloads
At the heart of anthropology and the social sciences lies a notion of human existence according to which humans and animals share the basic need for food, but only humans have the capacity for morality. Based on fieldwork in a pig laboratory, a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and a dementia nursing home, we follow practices of feeding precarious lives lacking most markers of human personhood, including the exercise of moral judgment. Despite the absence of such markers, laboratory researchers and caregivers in these three sites do not abstain from engaging in questions about the moral status of the piglets, infants, and people with dementia in their care. They continually negotiate how their charges belong to the human collectivity and thereby challenge the notion of ‘the human’ that is foundational to anthropology. Combining analytical approaches that do not operate with a fixed boundary between human and animal value and agency with approaches that focus on human experience and virtue ethics, we argue that ‘the human’ at stake in the moral laboratory of feeding precarious lives puts ‘the human’ in anthropology at disposal for moral experimentation.
KeywordsHuman personhood Moral laboratory Animal experimentation Multi-species Neonatal intensive care Dementia care
Our sincere thanks to the researchers in the pig laboratory, and the many caregivers in the NICU and the dementia nursing home, all of whom invited us into their daily work practices and willingly engaged in conversations with us. Thank you to the participants in the panel “Moral (and other) Laboratories” at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association in Denver 2015 and to the participants in the workshop “Human and Animals at the Margins” in Copenhagen 2016. Thank you to Teresa Kuan and Lone Grøn for encouraging us to address the issue of “moral laboratories” across our sites and for organizing this special issue. For intellectual inspiration, we are grateful to Tobias Rees who commented on an earlier version of this article and to the two anonymous reviewers who contributed with highly constructive feedback and helped us sharpen our arguments. We acknowledge the support from the Danish Research Councils (Sapere Aude grant 12-133657) and from the research centre NEOMUNE.
- Bruns, Gerald L. 2011 On Ceasing to Be Human. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dam, Mie S., Sandra M. Petersen, Per T. Sangild, and Mette N. Svendsen Forthcoming Feeding Premature Neonates: Kinship and Species in Translational Neonatology.Google Scholar
- Danish Health and Medicines Authority. 2012a Vejledning om forudgående fravalg af livsforlængende behandling, herunder genoplivningsforsøg, og om afbrydelse af behandling. [Guideline concerning refusal of life-extending treatment including resuscitation attempts, and ceasing of treatment]. Copenhagen: Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed.Google Scholar
- Danish Health and Medicines Authority. 2012b Vejledning om fravalg af livsforlængende behandling, herunder genoplivningsforsøg, og om afbrydelse af behandling, uden for sygehuse. [Guideline concerning refusal of life-extending treatment including resuscitation attempts, and ceasing of treatment in non-hospital situations]. Copenhagen: Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed.Google Scholar
- Dussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee, eds. 2015 Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- European Parliament. 2010 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes.Google Scholar
- Geertz, Clifford 1973 The interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publichers.Google Scholar
- Gjødsbøl, Iben M., Lene Koch and Mette N. Svendsen Forthcoming Resisting decay: Disposing (of) and (re)valuing people with late stage dementia in the nursing home.Google Scholar
- Latour, Bruno 1987 Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark. 2014 Governmental order about the use of animals in research. Reference number: 2014-32-00002Google Scholar
- Rees, Tobias 2015 Plastic Reason. An Anthropology of Brain Science in Embryogenetic Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Rees, Tobias 2017 After Ethnos. Sketches of a Deanthropologized Anthropology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Scheper-Hughes, Nancy 1992 Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2003 General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant), E/C.12/2002/11. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d11.html, accessed January 20, 2003.
- Whatmore, Sarah 2014 Political Ecology in a More-than-Human World. In Anthropology and Nature, edited by Kirsten Hastrup. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Woolgar, Steve 1991 “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, edited by John Law, 57–102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yates-Doerr, Emily and Annemarie Mol 2012 Cuts of Meat. Disentangling Western Nature-Cultures. Cambridge Anthropology 30(2):48-64.Google Scholar
- Zelizer, Viviana A. 1994 Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar