Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of penguin geometric features for the biomimetics applications: overview and analysis

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Penguins display an utmost degree of adaptation to the marine environment as their water locomotion resembles flying, with their flippers demonstrating multimodal functionality. By multimodality of flipper action (two hydrodynamic modes + bipedal gait balance), we mean that flapping performance is dominant in certain periods and, in that case, Strouhal number is important. There are also periods when the steady (non-flapping) mode is dominant, i.e., the flipper acts as a fixed foil; hence both hydrodynamic modes are analysed in this study. Strouhal number from wing-beat frequency and swimming speed is derived across different penguin species, and the effect of flapping amplitude on the Strouhal number is studied. It is established that \(\mathrm{St}\) during aquatic flights for maximum cases falls within the theoretical range of higher propulsive efficiency (0.2 < Strouhal number < 0.4), which gives us the confidence to consider penguin wings as an efficient flapping foil in the autonomous underwater vehicle. Moreover, the estimated buoyancy force at lower depth explains how penguin returns to the water surface capitalizing on the high buoyancy force while their wings act as a fixed foil and, that way generate beneficial lift. Then, a numerical analysis was performed to estimate the aerodynamic forces generated by the static penguin wing at a Reynolds number of 60,000 in order to understand its feasibility of application for Micro aerial vehicles. It was found that up to 10° angle of attack, the standard NACA0012 profile shows a higher lift-to-drag, whereas at 15° and 20° angle of attack, as the penguin wing one is 122% and 60.62% higher than the NACA0012 aerofoil. Implementation of scaling the geometric features of penguins for wing design applications is also simulated and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Najem J, Sarles SA, Akle B, Leo DJ (2012) Biomimetic jellyfish-inspired underwater vehicle actuated by ionic polymer metal composite actuators. Smart Mater Struct 21(9):094026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo J (2006) A waypoint-tracking controller for a biomimetic autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng 33(17–18):2369–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dabnichki P (2011) Unsteady fluid mechanics effects in water based human locomotion. Math Comput Simul 82(3):471–482

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardano P, Dabnichki P (2006) On hydrodynamics of drag and lift of the human arm. J Biomech 39(15):2767–2773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis RW, Kooyman GL (1984) Free-ranging energetics of penguins. Seab Energ 245–253

  6. Triantafyllou GS, Triantafyllou MS, Grosenbaugh MA (1993) Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J Fluids Struct 7(2):205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Triantafyllou MS, Triantafyllou GS, Gopalkrishnan R (1991) Wake mechanics for thrust generation in oscillating foils. Phys Fluids A 3(12):2835–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson JM, Streitlien K, Barrett DS, Triantafyllou MS (1998) Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency. J Fluid Mech 360:41–72

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Masud MH, La Mantia M, Dabnichki P (2022) Estimate of Strouhal and Reynolds numbers for swimming penguins. J Avian Biol 2022(2):e02886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masud MH, Dabnichki P (2023) Strouhal number analysis for the swimming of little penguin (Eudyptula minor): proof of efficient underwater propulsion. Results in Engineering 17:100840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, Niizuma Y, Watanuki Y, Charrassin JB, Bost CA, Handrich Y, Le Maho Y (2002) Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume? J Exp Biol 205(9):1189–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sato K, Shiomi K, Watanabe Y, Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Ponganis PJ (2010) Scaling of swim speed and stroke frequency in geometrically similar penguins: they swim optimally to minimize cost of transport. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1682):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ropert-Coudert Y (2018) The Penguiness book. Penguiness book. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.penguiness.net, version 3.0

  14. Sato K, Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Miller PJ, Tanaka H, Kawabe R, Ponganis PJ, Handrich Y, Akamatsu T, Watanabe Y, Mitani Y (2007) Stroke frequency, but not swimming speed, is related to body size in free-ranging seabirds, pinnipeds and cetaceans. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274(1609):471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponganis PJ, St Leger J, Scadeng M (2015) Penguin lungs and air sacs: implications for baroprotection, oxygen stores and buoyancy. J Exp Biol 218(5):720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eloy C (2012) Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals. J Fluids Struct 30:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harada N, Oura T, Maeda M, Shen Y, Kikuchi DM, Tanaka H (2021) Kinematics and hydrodynamics analyses of swimming penguins: wing bending improves propulsion performance. J Exp Biol 224(21):jeb242140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda T, Fukui K, Matsuo K, Minagawa H, Kurimoto R (2019) Effect of the Reynolds number on the performance of a NACA0012 wing with leading edge protuberance at low Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul Combust 102:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kowalczuk Z, Tatara MS (2021) Analytical ‘steady-state’-based derivation and clarification of the courant-friedrichs-lewy condition for pipe flow. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 91:103953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2011) Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone-tip diameters. Comput Fluids 51(1):48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark BD, Bemis W (1979) Kinematics of swimming of penguins at the Detroit Zoo. J Zool 188(3):411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bilo D, Nachtigall W (1980) A simple method to determine drag coefficients in aquatic animals. J Exp Biol 87(1):357–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hui CA (1988) Penguin swimming. I. Hydrodynamics. Physiol Zool 61(4):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lovvorn J, Liggins GA, Borstad MH, Calisal SM, Mikkelsen J (2001) Hydrodynamic drag of diving birds: effects of body size, body shape and feathers at steady speeds. J Exp Biol 204(9):1547–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu X, Zhang X, Tian X, Li X, Lu W (2020) A review on fluid dynamics of flapping foils. Ocean Eng 195:106712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Floryan D, Van Buren T, Smits AJ (2018) Efficient cruising for swimming and flying animals is dictated by fluid drag. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(32):8116–8118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Read DA, Hover FS, Triantafyllou MS (2003) Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering. J Fluids Struct 17(1):163–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schouveiler L, Hover FS, Triantafyllou MS (2005) Performance of flapping foil propulsion. J Fluids Struct 20(7):949–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hover FS, Haugsdal Ø, Triantafyllou MS (2004) Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion. J Fluids Struct 19(1):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Techet AH (2008) Propulsive performance of biologically inspired flapping foils at high Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol 211(2):274–279

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sánchez-Caja A, Martio J (2017) On the optimum performance of oscillating foil propulsors. J Mar Sci Technol 22:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guglielmini L, Blondeaux P (2004) Propulsive efficiency of oscillating foils. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 23(2):255–278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Tuncer IH, Kaya M (2005) Optimization of flapping airfoils for maximum thrust and propulsive efficiency. AIAA J 43(11):2329–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee JS, Kim C, Kim KH (2006) Design of flapping airfoil for optimal aerodynamic performance in low-reynolds number flows. AIAA J 44(9):1960–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuncer IH, Platzer MF (1996) Thrust generation due to airfoil flapping. AIAA J 34(2):324–331

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Karbasian HR, Esfahani JA (2017) Enhancement of propulsive performance of flapping foil by fish-like motion pattern. Comput Fluids 156:305–316

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Isogai K, Shinmoto Y, Watanabe Y (1999) Effects of dynamic stall on propulsive efficiency and thrust of flapping airfoil. AIAA J 37(10):1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Maeda M, Harada N, Tanaka H (2021) Hydrodynamics of gliding penguin flipper suggests the adjustment of sweepback with swimming speeds. bioRxiv 2021–05

  39. Mueller TJ (2000) Aerodynamic measurements at low raynolds numbers for fixed wing micro-air vehicles. In: Notre dame Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.

  40. Liu T (2006) Comparative scaling of flapping-and fixed-wing flyers. AIAA J 44(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liebe R (ed) (2007) vol 1. WIT Press, Ashurst

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Malipeddi AK, Mahmoudnejad N, Hoffmann KA (2012) Numerical analysis of effects of leading-edge protuberances on aircraft wing performance. J Aircr 49(5):1336–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Islam MT, Arefin AM, Masud MH, Mourshed M (2018) The effect of Reynolds number on the performance of a modified NACA 2412 airfoil. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1980, no 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 040015

  44. Masud MH, Naim-Ul-Hasan AAME, Joardder MU (2017) Design modification of airfoil by integrating sinusoidal leading edge and dimpled surface. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1851, no 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 020048

  45. Skillen A, Revell A, Pinelli A, Piomelli U, Favier J (2015) Flow over a wing with leading-edge undulations. AIAA J 53(2):464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McMichael JM (1997) Micro air vehicles-toward a new dimension in flight. http://www.arpa.gov/tto/MAV/mav_auvsi.html

  47. Baligidad SM, Narayanaswamy N, Krishnamurthy N (2017) Bio-inspired bi-plane flapping wing MAV. Open J Mech Eng (OJME) 1(1):4–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding information that needs to be mentioned.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MHM analysed the data, performed the numerical analysis and wrote the manuscript, including figures and tables. PD designed the study and validated the results. Both authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahadi Hasan Masud.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statements

The carcass of the Little penguin was collected from the Philip Island research group under Permit no.: 10009208 of wildlife act 1975.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masud, M.H., Dabnichki, P. Feasibility of penguin geometric features for the biomimetics applications: overview and analysis. Meccanica 58, 847–858 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01657-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01657-2

Keywords

Navigation