Skip to main content
Log in

A note on the catenary arch bending-moment-free paradox

  • Brief Notes and Discussions
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the analogy between a hanging chain and a masonry arch, catenary has been for centuries considered to be an ideal arch shape, since it involves pure axial thrust. In recent studies, the equilibrium analysis of the catenary arch of finite uniform thickness under self-weight is revisited under Thrust line theory. Accordingly, it is the only shape in which a shear-free state is possible, but a bending-moment-free state cannot be attained since the thrust line coincident with the arch midline (geometrical axis) is not admissible. In the present research, the true location of centres of gravity of infinitesimal voussoirs—which are not coincident with the arch midline, is introduced into the consideration regarding bending-moments. It is shown that for a catenary arch, with rectangular cross-section, constant mass density and normal stereotomy, there is an admissible shear-free thrust line coincident with the arch centroidal axis. Since it is at a finite distance from the geometrical axis, such a shear-free state is not bending moment-free. However, since the deviation between the centroidal axis and the geometrical axis is small, the catenary shape can be rather viewed as a quasi-ideal shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Austria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Hooke R (1676) A description of helioscopes and some other instruments. John Martyn, London

  2. Truesdell C (1960) The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies 1638–1788. Introduction to Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, 2nd series, vol XI. Orell Füssli, Zürich

  3. Nikolić D (2019) Catenary arch of finite thickness as the optimal arch shape. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02304-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nodargi NA, Bisegna P (2020) Thrust line analysis revisited and applied to optimization of masonry arches. Int J Mech Sci 179:105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gere JM, Timoshenko SP (1997) Mechanics of materials. PWS Publishing Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milankovitch M (1907) Theorie der druckkurven. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 55:1–27

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Benvenuto E (1991) An introduction to the history of structural mechanics, vol II: vaulted structures and elastic systems. Springer-Verlag, New York

  8. De la Hire P (1695) Traité de mecanique. Imprimerie Royale, Paris

  9. Salimbeni L (1787) Degli archi e delle volte. Dionigi Ramanzini, Verona

  10. Heyman J (1997) The Stone skeleton: structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Angelillo M (ed) (2014) Mechanics of masonry structures. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200156).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitriye Nikolich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolich, D. A note on the catenary arch bending-moment-free paradox. Meccanica 57, 1457–1462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01513-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01513-9

Keywords