Abstract
Based on the analogy between a hanging chain and a masonry arch, catenary has been for centuries considered to be an ideal arch shape, since it involves pure axial thrust. In recent studies, the equilibrium analysis of the catenary arch of finite uniform thickness under self-weight is revisited under Thrust line theory. Accordingly, it is the only shape in which a shear-free state is possible, but a bending-moment-free state cannot be attained since the thrust line coincident with the arch midline (geometrical axis) is not admissible. In the present research, the true location of centres of gravity of infinitesimal voussoirs—which are not coincident with the arch midline, is introduced into the consideration regarding bending-moments. It is shown that for a catenary arch, with rectangular cross-section, constant mass density and normal stereotomy, there is an admissible shear-free thrust line coincident with the arch centroidal axis. Since it is at a finite distance from the geometrical axis, such a shear-free state is not bending moment-free. However, since the deviation between the centroidal axis and the geometrical axis is small, the catenary shape can be rather viewed as a quasi-ideal shape.



Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Hooke R (1676) A description of helioscopes and some other instruments. John Martyn, London
Truesdell C (1960) The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies 1638–1788. Introduction to Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, 2nd series, vol XI. Orell Füssli, Zürich
Nikolić D (2019) Catenary arch of finite thickness as the optimal arch shape. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02304-9
Nodargi NA, Bisegna P (2020) Thrust line analysis revisited and applied to optimization of masonry arches. Int J Mech Sci 179:105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105690
Gere JM, Timoshenko SP (1997) Mechanics of materials. PWS Publishing Company, Boston
Milankovitch M (1907) Theorie der druckkurven. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 55:1–27
Benvenuto E (1991) An introduction to the history of structural mechanics, vol II: vaulted structures and elastic systems. Springer-Verlag, New York
De la Hire P (1695) Traité de mecanique. Imprimerie Royale, Paris
Salimbeni L (1787) Degli archi e delle volte. Dionigi Ramanzini, Verona
Heyman J (1997) The Stone skeleton: structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Angelillo M (ed) (2014) Mechanics of masonry structures. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200156).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nikolich, D. A note on the catenary arch bending-moment-free paradox. Meccanica 57, 1457–1462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01513-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01513-9