Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic behavior and damage-evolution model of frozen soil

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic behavior of frozen soil under different experimental conditions is examined under impact using the split Hopkinson pressure bar. The experimental results indicate that frozen soil is a rate-dependent and temperature-sensitive material. Based on the theory of consecutive damage mechanics and the Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion, a coupled model of plasticity and damage is proposed to describe the mechanical behavior of frozen soil subjected to impact loadings. Two aspects of the damage mechanism, namely, the tensile damage and compression damage, are coupled to describe damage evolution. The prediction result indicates that the constitutive model can well reveal the relationship between the stress and strain of frozen soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu X, Wang C, Zhang J (1997) Physics of frozen soil. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bray MT (2012) The influence of cryostructure on the creep behavior of ice-rich permafrost. Cold Reg Sci Technol 79–80(6):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oka F, Higo Y, Kimoto S (2002) Effect of dilatancy on the strain localization of water-saturated elasto-viscoplastic soil. Int J Solids Struct 39(13):3625–3647

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Z, Wei M, Zhang S et al (2016) Multiaxial creep of frozen loess. Mech Mater 95:172–191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lai YM, Liao MK, Hu K (2016) A constitutive model of frozen saline sandy soil based on energy dissipation theory. Int J Plast 78:84–113

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lai Y, Long J, Chang X (2009) Yield criterion and elasto-plastic damage constitutive model for frozen sandy soil. Int J Plast 25(6):1177–1205

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu G, Wu W, Qi J (2016) Modeling the viscous behavior of frozen soil with hypoplasticity. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40(15):2061–2075

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li Q, Lai Y, Xu X et al (2010) Triaxial strength distribution of warm frozen soil and its damage statistical constitutive model. J Glaciol Geocryol 6:1234–1241

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu S, Zhang J (2012) Review on physic mechanical properties of warm frozen soil. J Glaciol Geocryol 34(1):120–129

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin H, Wang S, Lv L et al (2009) Features of permafrost degradation in Hinggan Mountains, Northeastern China. Sci Geogr Sinica 29(2):223–228

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bjerke T, Li Z, Lambros J (2002) Role of plasticity in heat generation during high rate deformation and fracture of polycarbonate. Int J Plast 18(4):549–567

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ning J, He Y, Zhu Z (2014) Dynamic constitutive modeling of frozen soil under impact loading. Chin Sci Bull 59(26):3255–3259

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ma QY (2010) Experimental analysis of dynamic mechanical properties for artificially frozen clay by the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 51(3):448–452

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen B (2005) Experimental research of dynamic mechanical behaviors of frozen soil. Acta Mech Sinica 37(6):724–728

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange MA, Ahrens TJ (1983) The dynamic tensile strength of ice and ice-silicate mixtures. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 88(B2):1197–1208

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ma QY (2010) Experimental analysis of dynamic mechanical properties for artificially frozen clay by the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 51(3):448–452

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin BE, Chen W, Song B et al (2009) Moisture effects on the high strain-rate behavior of sand. Mech Mater 41(6):786–798

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song B, Chen W, Luk V (2009) Impact compressive response of dry sand. Mech Mater 41(6):777–785

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang H, Zhu Z, Song S et al (2013) Dynamic behavior of frozen soil under uniaxial strain and stress conditions. Appl Math Mech 34(2):229–238

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xie Q, Zhu Z, Kang G (2016) A dynamic micromechanical constitutive model for frozen soil under impact loading. Acta Mech Solida Sin 29(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu Z, Kang G, Ma Y et al (2016) Temperature damage and constitutive model of frozen soil under dynamic loading. Mech Mater 102:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tang ZP (1981) Mechanical behavior of epoxy resin under high strain rates. University of Science and Technology of China

  23. Ma D, Ma Q, Yuan P (2017) SHPB tests and dynamic constitutive model of artificial frozen sandy clay under confining pressure and temperature state. Cold Reg Sci Technol 136:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Z, Liu Z, Xie Q et al (2018) Dynamic mechanical experiments and microstructure constitutive model of frozen soil with different particle sizes. Int J Damage Mech 27(5):686–706

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie Q, Zhu Z, Kang G (2014) Dynamic stress–strain behavior of frozen soil: experiments and modeling. Cold Reg Sci Technol 106–107(10):153–160

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cao C, Zhu Z, Fu T et al (2018) A constitutive model for frozen soil based on rate-dependent damage evolution. Int J Damage Mech 27(10):1589–1600

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moran DA, Pantelides CP (2012) Elliptical and circular FRP-confined concrete sections: a Mohr–Coulomb analytical model. Int J Solids Struct 49(6):881–898

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lennon AM, Ramesh KT (1998) A technique for measuring the dynamic behavior of materials at high temperatures. Int J Plast 14(12):1279–1292

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang LL (2005) Foundation of stress waves. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu ZY, Ling XZ, Chen SJ et al (2010) Experimental investigation on the train-induced subsidence prediction model of Beiluhe permafrost subgrade along the Qinghai–Tibet Railway in China. Cold Reg Sci Technol 62(1):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Y (2014) Dynamic mechanical properties and failure mechanism of frozen sandy soil. Southwest Jiaotong University

  32. Bischoff PH, Perry SH (1991) Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates. Mater Struct 24(6):425–450

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu HF, Ning JG (2008) Dynamic constitutive model of concrete subjected to impact loading. Eng Mech 25(12):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  34. He YX (2014) Constitutive model of clay and frozen soil under impact loading. Beijing Institute of Technology

  35. Zuo QH, Addessio FL et al (2006) A rate-dependent damage model for brittle materials based on the dominant crack. Int J Solids Struct 43(11):3350–3380

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Clayton JD (2008) A model for deformation and fragmentation in crushable brittle solids. Int J Impact Eng 35(5):269–289

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lemaitre JA, Plumtree A (1979) Application of damage concepts to predict creep-fatigue failures. J Eng Mater Technol 101(3):284–292

    Google Scholar 

  38. Laws N (1987) The effect of micro-crack systems on the loss of stiffness of brittle solids. Int J Solids Struct 23(9):1247–1268

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang C (2017) Study on deformation mechanism and simulation method of full deformation process for brittle rock. Hunan University

  40. Zhang H, He Y, Han L et al (2007) Statistic analysis of the evolution laws of micro cracks in rock failure process by finite element method. J China Univ Min Technol 36(2):166–171

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu HF, Ning JG (2008) Constitutive model of concrete subjected to intense impact loading. Chin J Solid Mech 29(3):231–238

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bai YL (1992) Damage and breakage of material subjected to impact loading. In: Wang LL, Yu TX, Li YC (eds) Devolvement of Dynamic Mechanics. Press of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, pp 34–57

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu XR, Carlsson AJ (1991) Weight function and stress intensity factor analysis. Pergamon Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. John Reji (2016) Mixed-mode fracture of concrete subjected to impact loading. J Struct Eng 116(3):585–602

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Lambert DE, Ross CA (2000) Strain rate effects on dynamic fracture and strength. Int J Impact Eng 24(10):985–998

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tandon S, Faber KT (1999) Effects of loading rate on the fracture of cementitious materials1. Cem Concr Res 29(3):397–406

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang DR (2002) Analytical model and numerical simulations of hypervelocity penetration. University of Science and Technology of China

  48. Hu S, Wang D (2002) Dynamic constitutive relation of concrete material under impact load. Explos Impact 22(3):242–246

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu ZW, Ning JG, Ma W (2010) A constitutive model of frozen soil with damage and numerical simulation for the coupled problem. Sci China Ser G (Phys Mech Astron) 53(4):699–711

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hou X (2013) A study of frozen soil elastoplastic constitutive relationship model with triaxial shear characteristics. AnHui University of Science and Technology

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB1200505), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11672253, 11972028), and the Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory for strength and vibration of Mechanical Structures (SV2019-KF-19).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiwu Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, T., Zhu, Z. & Cao, C. Dynamic behavior and damage-evolution model of frozen soil. Meccanica 55, 177–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01100-5

Keywords

Navigation