Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the critical layer in the channel flow transition revisited

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the development of a novel and simple linear modeling to interpret the (asymptotic) instability conditions for laminar channel (Poiseuille) flow, thereby giving insight on the major length and time scales of the subsequent mean turbulent regime. Although this is an old problem, recently there has been a renewed effort to understand how information on the wall turbulence scalings can be obtained by studying the flow linear dynamics, among other approaches by using the resolvent analysis. Here the classic asymptotic stability analysis is reformulated by means of a pseudo two-fluid model, a central inviscid flow motion, and a wall viscous one, forcing each other on their common interface streamline. The best agreement with the results of the celebrated Orr–Sommerfeld equation is obtained for the interface located around the elevation of the base flow average value, equal to 2/3 times the maximum velocity (frequency scale). It is argued that, in the early stage of perturbations growth, while the mechanism leading to instability (and that is related to the extraction of energy from the base flow via the Reynolds stress), is located near the wall in the critical layer region (already known result for inner length scale), the central region around the flow average velocity (i.e., the outer length scale is of order \({\mathcal {O}}(h)\), with h being the channel half-height) is also deeply involved in the onset of the instability. The initial linear amplification of the wall viscous modes of the present analysis agrees with the major features of the wall functions driving the full turbulent profile, found by means of the resolvent analysis, in the subsequent nonlinear stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drazin P, Reid W (1981) Hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tollmien W (1931) The production of turbulence. Tech. Rep. NACA-TM-609

  3. Pekeris CL, Shkoller B (1969) Stability of plane Poiseuille flow to periodic perturbances of finite amplitude. J Fluid Mech 39:611–627

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas LH (1953) The stability of plane Poiseuille flow. Phys Rev 91:780–783

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Stuart JT (1963) Hydrodynamic stability. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar bondary layers. Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charru F (2011) Hydrodynamic instability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindzen RS (1988) Instability of plane parallel shear flow (toward a mechanistic picture of how it works). Pageoph 126:103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baines P, Majumdar S, Mitsudera H (1996) The mechanics of the Tollmien–Schlichting wave. J Fluid Mech 312:107–124

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Howard L, Maslowe S (1973) Stability of stratified shear flows. Bound Layer Meteorol 4:511–523

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drazin P (2002) Introduction to hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy A, Subramanian G (2014) An inviscid modal interpretation of the lift-up effect. J Fluid Mech 757:82–113

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hack MJP, Moin P (2018) Coherent instability in wall-bounded shear. J Fluid Mech 844:917–955

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall P (2018) Vortex-wave interaction arrays: A sustaining mechanism for the log layer? J Fluid Mech 850:46–82

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McKeon BJ, Sharma AS (2010) A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 658:336–382

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. McKeon BJ, Sharma AS, Jacobi I (2013) Experimental manipulation of wall turbulence: a system approach. Phys Fluids 25:031301

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. McKeon BJ (2017) The engine behind (wall) turbulence: perspectives on scale interactions. J Fluid Mech 817:P1

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mack LM (1976) A numerical study of the temporal eigenvalue spectrum of the Blasius boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 73(3):497–520

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Coppola G, de Luca L (2006) On transient growth oscillations in linear models. Phys Fluids 18(7):078104

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Orazzo A, Coppola G, de Luca L (2014) Disturbance energy growth in core-annular flow. J Fluid Mech 747:44–72

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Girfoglio M, De Rosa F, Coppola G, de Luca L (2017) Unsteady critical liquid sheet flows. J Fluid Mech 821:219–247

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid PJ, Henningson DS (2012) Stability and transition in shear flows. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. South MJ, Hooper AP (1999) Linear growth in two-fluid plane Poiseuille flow. J Fluid Mech 381:121–139

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee H, Wang S (2019) Extension of classical stability theory to viscous planar wall-bounded shear flows. J Fluid Mech 877:1134–1162

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Salin D, Talon L (2019) Revisiting the linear stability analysis and absolute–convective transition of two fluid core annular flow. J Fluid Mech 865:743–761

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Pope S (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Fortunato De Rosa, Enrico Maria De Angelis and Mario Lauria for their support in developing various numerical tools employed in the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi de Luca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palumbo, A., Chiatto, M. & de Luca, L. The role of the critical layer in the channel flow transition revisited. Meccanica 54, 2169–2182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01079-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01079-z

Keywords

Navigation