Abstract
For accurate measurements of moments of inertia, or gyradii, about a vertical axis the offset of the center of mass of the suspended body from the symmetry axis of the suspension is required. A number of simple methods of determining this offset from yaw period measurements are described and experimentally shown to provide results of precision equal or better than suspension line tension measurements and thus eliminating the necessity for the use of strain gauges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jardin MR, Mueller ER (2009) Optimized measurements of unmanned-air-vehicle mass moment of inertia with a bifilar pendulum. J Aircr 46:763–775
McClelland WA (2006) Inertial measurement and dynamic stability analysis of a radio-controlled jointed-wing aircraft. In: Aeronautical Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, ohio
Halder A et al (2008) Determination of inertial characteristics of a high wing unmanned air vehicle. IE(I) J AS 89:3–8
Bussamra, FLdS, Vilchez CMM, Santos JC (2009) Experimental determination of unmanned aircraft inertial properties. In: 3rd CTA-DLR workshop on data analysis and flight control, 2009 Brazilian symposium on aerospace eng. & applications, S. J. Campos, SP, Brazil
Green MW (1927) Measurement of the moments of inertia of full scale aircraft. In: Technical notes National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, Washington, p 1–18
Miller MP (1930) An accurate method of measuring the moments of inertia of airplanes. In: Technical notes National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 351, p 26
de Jong RC, Mulder JA (1987) Accurate estimate of aircraft inertia characteristics from a single suspension experiment. J. Aircr 24(6):362–370
Fennell LJ (1967) Measurement of the moments of inertia of a Handley Page HP115 aircraft. Aeronautical Research Council, Her Majesty`s Stationary Office, London
Hou Z-C, Lv Y, Lao Y-X (2009) A new trifilar pendulum approach to identify all inertia parameters of a rigid body or assembly. Mech Mach Theory 44(6):1270–1280
Hinrichsen PF (1991) Gyradius measurement of Olympic class Dinghies and Keelboats. In: The tenth Cheasapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium. SNAME, the Chesapeake Bay Yacht Racing Association, Annapolis, p 1–16
Hinrichsen PF (2014) Bifilar suspension measurement of boat inertia parameters. J Sailboat Technol 1:1–36
Williams H (2007) Measuring the inertia tensor. In IMA Mathematics 2007 Conference. IMA, Manchester
Bois JLd, Lieven N, Adhikari S (2009) Error analysis in trifilar inertia measurements. Exp Mech 49:533–540
Kane TR, Tseng G-T (1967) Dynamics of the bifilar pendulum. Int J Mech Sci 9(2):83–96
Swart W (2016) Determining the moments of inertia using a bifilar pendulum. In: TECHNISCHE WISKUNDE, Technische Universiteit Delft Faculteit Elektrotechniek, Wiskunde en Informatica Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft, Nederland
Korr AL, Hyer P (1962) A trifilar pendulum for the determination of moments of inertia. Armed services technical information agency report R-1653. Frankford Arsenal, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1–51. https://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/287534.pdf
Swank AJ (2012) Precision mass property measurements using a five-wire torsion pendulum. NASA Glen Resaearch Center, Cleveland. https://www.aspe.net/publications/Short%20Abstracts%2012A/3599.pdf
Swank AJ (2009) Gravitational mass attraction measurement for drag-free references In: Aeronautics and Astronautics. http://gradworks.umi.com/3364514.pdf. Stanford University, Stamford, p 276
Kane TR, Levinson DA (2005) Dynamics theory and applications. The Internet-First University Press, Ithaca, p 380
Newman FH, Searle VH (1951) The general properties of matter, 4th edn. Edward Arnold & Co, London, p 431
Hinrichsen PF (2016) In plane oscillation of a bifilar pendulum. Phys Educ 51(6):1–6
Crede CE (1948) Determining moment of inertia. Mach Design 138
Cromer A (1995) Many oscillations of a rigid rod. Am J Phys 63(2):112–121
Marion JB (1970) Classical dynamics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, p 573
Yu G (2011) NODE +. Variable, Inc. 100 Cherokee Blvd. Suite 327, Chattanooga, TN 37405, USA. http://variableinc.com/products/
Scientific, P., Pasco Force Sensor Cl-6537. 2000, Pasco Scientific: 10101 Foothills Blvd., Roseville, CA 95747-7100
SPSS Science (2000) TableCurve 2D. http://www.sigmaplot.com/products/tablecurve2d/tablecurve2d.php
Hinrichsen PF (2015) Analysis of bi and trifilar suspension oscillations. Researchgate, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Hinrichsen3/publications. p. 64
Genta G, Delprete C (1994) Some considerations on the experimental determination of moments of inertia. Meccanica 29:125–141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Trifilar suspension with offset center of mass
Appendix: Trifilar suspension with offset center of mass
When the center of mass is offset from the symmetry axis of a trifilar suspension by b = βd at an angle ψ, see Fig. 3b, the line tensions become:
Then for a small yaw rotation θ about the symmetry axis the horizontal components and net horizontal force \(\bar{F}_{\varSigma } = \sum\limits_{i} {\bar{F}_{i} }\) are:
Thus \(\bar{F}_{\varSigma }\) is perpendicular to the center of mass offset \(\bar{b}\) and of magnitude \(F_{\varSigma } = \left( {{{M_{T} gb} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{M_{T} gb} l}} \right. \kern-0pt} l}} \right)\theta\) i.e. proportional to the yaw angle θ and thus will oscillate with the yaw frequency and excite sway-surge oscillations. If the suspension spacing d is close to the yaw gyradius k yT then the sway-surge frequency is close to the yaw frequency which will be resonantly excited. The development of sway-surge oscillation, after initial yaw rotation about the symmetry axis, is an indication of an offset center of mass, with the offset perpendicular to the sway-surge oscillation.
The torque \(\bar{\varGamma }_{CM}\) about the offset center of mass can be expressed as that about the symmetry axis plus the vector product of \(\bar{b}\) and \(\bar{F}_{\varSigma }\) as:
Then substituting Eq. (24) leads to a torque about the center of mass of magnitude \(\varGamma_{CM} = {{M_{T} g\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)\theta } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{M_{T} g\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)\theta } l}} \right. \kern-0pt} l}\) and so a period of small angle yaw oscillation of \(T_{yo} = 2\pi k_{yT} \sqrt {{l \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {l {g\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {g\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)}}}\).
For rotations about any axis other than the symmetry axis the horizontal displacements of the suspension points are not equal, so the angular displacements ϕ i of the suspension lines, and hence the vertical displacements of the suspension points, are not equal, as becomes immediately obvious if the rotation is about one of the suspension lines. Thus the motion includes roll and pitch and the gyradii k r , and k p , as well as the center of mass height are required for a full description of the motion. Nonparallel suspensions exacerbate this problem. However, the roll-pitch angle is \(\varphi \approx {{ - b\theta^{2} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - b\theta^{2} } l}} \right. \kern-0pt} l}\) and the vertical motion, which is the source of the potential energy, has an acceleration \(\ddot{z} = {{\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)\left( {\dot{\theta }^{2} + \theta \ddot{\theta }} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {d^{2} - b^{2} } \right)\left( {\dot{\theta }^{2} + \theta \ddot{\theta }} \right)} l}} \right. \kern-0pt} l}\), which are both small for l > d and of second order in θ. Thus the tensions can be assumed to have approximately their static values and second order effects due to the vertical, sway, surge, roll and pitch motions can to first approximation be ignored [29].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hinrichsen, P.F. Bi and trifilar suspension centering correction. Meccanica 53, 21–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0700-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0700-7