Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transparency enhancement for an active knee orthosis by a constraint-free mechanical design and a gait phase detection based predictive control

  • Advances in Biomechanics: from foundations to applications
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel mechanical design of a lower limb exoskeleton device which prevents the residual stresses due to arthro-kinematics movements of synovial joints and by the way allows effective compensation for dynamic disturbances in osteo-kinematic movements of the wearer. Here, the exoskeleton is only actuated at the knee joints to provide assistive torques, which are required to assist the anatomical joint motion and to increase the transparency of the device. Dynamic simulations of a virtual human equipped with this exoskeleton are used to quantify the disturbances induced by the device during locomotion and to show the benefit of passive mechanisms introduced in the mechanical attaches as well. The authors also demonstrated how the device’s transparency can be improved by providing the motor torques in order to compensate the inertial and gravitational effects. This can be done rely on the knowledge of the locomotion movement phases. A robust gait phase detection method was implemented on the experimental device in order to identify specific gait phases in real time. This method exploits the K-nearest neighbors algorithm to identify the k-closest trained vectors, coupling with a discrete time Markov chain to determine the phases shift probability during the gait cycle. This gait detection algorithm was tested with a percentage of success of more than 95% when the subjects walked with constant and variable stride lengths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop M, Brunt D, Pathare N, Patel B (2004) The effect of velocity on the strategies used during gait termination. Gait Posture 20:134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai VAD, Bru B, Bidaud P, Hayward V, Gosselin F, Pasqui V (2010) Experimental evaluation of a goniometer for the identification of anatomical joint motions. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines, pp 1255–1262

  3. Cai VAD, Bidaud P, Hayward V, Gosselin F, Dessaily E (2011) Self-adjusting isostatic exoskeleton for the human knee joint. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 612–618

  4. Cai VAD, Nguyen VL, Bidaud P (2014) Instrumented and active exoskeletons for human anatomical joints: design methodology and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, pp 974–979

  5. Cavanagh PR, Komi PV (1979) Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 42(3):159–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen K, Bassett D Jr (2005) The technology of accelerometrybased activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(11):S490–S500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Wang W, Tyler-Kabara EC, Weber DJ (2013) High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. The Lancet 381(9866):557–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawley JA, Fite KB, Fulk GD (2013) Rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). In: IEEE international conference on Piscataway, EMG control of a bionic knee prosthesis: exploiting muscle co-contractions for improved locomotor function

  9. Dollar AM, Herr H (2008) Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot 24(1):144158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donath M (1974) Proportional EMG control for above-knee prosthesis

  11. Dzahir MAM, Yamamoto S (2014) Recent trends in lower-limb robotic rehabilitation orthosis: control scheme and strategy for pneumatic muscle actuated gait trainers. Robotics 3(2):120–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farris RJ, Quintero HA, Goldfarb M (2011) Preliminary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19(6):652659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farris RJ, Quintero HA, Murray SA, Ha KH, Hartigan C, Goldfarb M (2014) A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 22(3):482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischer C, Hommel G (2008) A humanexoskeleton interface utilizing electromyography. Robot IEEE Trans 24(4):872–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorsic M, Kamnik R, Ambrozic L, Vitiello N, Lefeber D, Pasquini G, Munih M (2014) Online phase detection using wearable sensors for walking with a robotic prosthesis. Sensors 14:2776–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three dimensional motions: application to the knee. Trans ASME 105:136–144

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guittet J (1979) The Spartacus telethesis: manipulator control studies. Bull Prosthet Res 16:69–105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herr H, Wilkenfeld A (2003) User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee. Ind Robot Int J 30(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herr H (2009) Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirata Y, Iwano T, Kosuge K (2008) Control of wearable walking helper on slope based on integration of acceleration and GRF information. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 08), Nice, France, September 2008, pp 3731–3736

  21. Hoover CD, Fulk GD, Fite KB (2012) The design and initial experimental validation of an active myoelectric transfemoral prosthesis. J Med Device 6(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang H, Zhang F, Hargrove LJ, Dou Z, Rogers DR, Englehart KB (2011) Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular mechanical fusion. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans 58(10):2867–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jarrasse N, Robertson J, Garrec P, Pasqui V, Perrot Y, Roby-Brami A, Wang D, Morel G (2008) Design and acceptability assessment of a new reversible orthosis. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), France, pp 1933–1939

  24. Jimnez-Fabian R, Verlinden O (2012) Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Med Eng Phys 34(4):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung JY et al (2015) A neural network-based gait phase classification method using sensors equipped on lower limb exoskeleton robots. Sensors 15(11):27738–27759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kajita S et al (2003) Biped walking pattern generation by using preview control of zero-moment point. In: IEEE international conference on proceedings of robotics and automation, ICRA’03, vol 2

  27. Kong K, Tomizuka M (2008) Smooth and continuous human gait phase detection based on foot pressure patterns. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, 19–23 May 2008, pp 3678–3683

  28. Mannini A, Sabatini AM (2011) A hidden Markov model-based technique for gait segmentation using a foot-mounted gyroscope. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering medicine and biology society, EMBS, Boston, MA, USA, 30 August–3 September 2011, pp 4369–4373

  29. Mannini A, Sabatini AM (2012) Gait phase detection and discrimination between walking-jogging activities using hidden Markov models applied to foot motion data from a gyroscope. Gait Posture 36:657–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. May BJ, Lockard MA (2011) Prosthetics & orthotics in clinical practice: a case study approach, 1st edn. F.A. Davis Company

  31. Meng M, She Q, Gao Y, Luo Z (2010) EMG signals based gait phases recognition using hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on information and automation, Harbin, China, 20–23 June 2010, pp 852–856

  32. Mihelj M, Podobnik J (2012) Haptics for virtual reality and teleoperation, chapter 8: stability analysis of haptic interfaces—predictive control for transparent teleoperation under communication time delay robotics, “Intelligent systems, control and automation: science and engineering”

  33. Novak D et al (2013) Automated detection of gait initiation and termination using wearable sensors. Med Eng Phys 35(12):1713–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. Bone Joint J 60:358–369

    Google Scholar 

  35. Orizio C (1993) Muscle sound: bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 21(3):201–243

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pappas IPI, Popovic MR, Keller T, Dietz V, Morari M (2001) A reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Perry J, Burnfield J (2010) Gait analysis normal and pathological function. Slack-Incorporated, Ed., Thorofare

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salini J, Padois V, Ibanez A, Bidaud P, Buendia A (2011) A goal driven perspective to generate humanoid motion synthesis. In: Field robotics proceedings of the 14th international conference on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines. World Scientific, pp 889–897

  39. Sancisi N, Parenti-Castelli V (2011) A new kinematic model of the passive motion of the knee inclusive of the patella. J Mech Robot 3(4):041003

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Sancisi N, Baldisserri B, Parenti-Castelli V, Belvedere C, Leaedini A (2014) One-degree-of-freedom spherical model for the passive motion of the human ankle joint. Med Biol Eng Comput 52(4):363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shull PB, Jirattigalachote W, Hunt MA, Cutkosky MR, Delp SL (2014) Quantified self and human movement: a review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention. Gait Posture 40(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith PN, Refshauge KM, Scarvell JM (2003) Development of the concepts of knee kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1895–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tao W, Liu T, Zheng R, Feng H (2012) Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors 12(2):2255–2283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tucker MR, Olivier J, Pagel A, Bleuler H, Bouri M, Lambercy O, Millań JR, Riener R, Vallery H, Gassert Roger (2015) Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Z, Jiang M, Hu Y, Li H (2012) An incremental learning method based on probabilistic neural networks and adjustable fuzzy clustering for human activity recognition by using wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(4):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Viet Anh Dung Cai, Viet Thang Nguyen & Minh Tam Nguyen

  2. Sorbonne Universites, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7222, ISIR, 75005, Paris, France

    Aurelien Ibanez & Consuelo Granata

Authors
  1. Viet Anh Dung Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aurelien Ibanez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Consuelo Granata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Viet Thang Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Minh Tam Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viet Anh Dung Cai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, V.A.D., Ibanez, A., Granata, C. et al. Transparency enhancement for an active knee orthosis by a constraint-free mechanical design and a gait phase detection based predictive control. Meccanica 52, 729–748 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0575-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0575-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation