Skip to main content
Log in

Self-adjustment mechanisms and their application for orthosis design

  • Advances in Biomechanics: from foundations to applications
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical orthoses aim at guiding anatomical joints along their natural trajectories while preventing pathological movements, especially in case of trauma or injuries. The motions that take place between bone surfaces have complex kinematics. These so-called arthrokinematic motions exhibit axes that move both in translation and rotation. Traditionally, orthoses are carefully adjusted and positioned such that their kinematics approximate the arthrokinematic movements as closely as possible in order to protect the joint. Adjustment procedures are typically long and tedious. We suggest in this paper another approach. We propose mechanisms having intrinsic self-aligning properties. They are designed such that their main axis self-adjusts with respect to the joint’s physiological axis during motion. When connected to a limb, their movement becomes homokinetic and they have the property of automatically minimizing internal stresses. The study is performed here in the planar case focusing on the most important component of the arthrokinematic motions of a knee joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu G, Cavanagh PR (1995) ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech 28(10):1257–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prothesis design. J Bone Joint Surg 60:358–369

    Google Scholar 

  3. Winsman J, Veldpaus F, Janssen J, Huson A, Struben P (1980) A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint. J Biomech 13:677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sancisi N, Parenti-Castelli V (2011) A sequentially-defined stiffness model of the knee. Mech Mach Theory 46(12):1920–1928

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sancisi N, Parenti-Castelli V (2011) A new kinematic model of the passive motion of the knee inclusive of the patella. J Mech Robot 3(4):041003

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Markolf KL, Kochan A, Amstutz HC (1984) Measurement of knee stiffness and laxity in patients with documented absence of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 66:242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roaas A, Andersson GBJ (1982) Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30–40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand 53(2):205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prothesis design. J Bone Jt Surg

  9. Cai VAD, Bru B, Bidaud P, Hayward V, Gosselin F, Pasqui V (2010) Experimental evaluation of a goniometer for the identification of anatomical joint motions. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines, pp 1255-1262

  10. Walker PS, Kurosawa H, Rovick JS, Zimmerman RA (1985) External knee joint design based on normal motion. J Rehabil Res Dev 22:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaserude GV, Rubin RH (1987) Polycentric Variable Axis Hinge, United States Patent, Pub. Num. 4.699.129

  12. Herzberg T, Albrod A, Orthosis Knee-Joint (2001) United States Patent, Pub. Num. 6,309,368 B1

  13. Lamb SR, Moore R (1985) Anatomic Fracture Brace For The Knee, United States Patent, Pub. Num. 4,523,585

  14. Lambert G, Orthosis Knee (2006) United States Patent, Pub. Num. US2006/0089581 A1

  15. Reynolds R, Weber R, Landsberger S, Orthesis Knee (2006) United States Patent, Patent Num. US 2006/0211967 A1

  16. Spring AN, Kofman J, Lemaire ED (2012) Design and evaluation of an orthotic knee-extension assist. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20(5):678–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shamaei K, Napolitano P, Dollar AM (2014) Design and functional evaluation of a quasi-passive compliant stance control kneeanklefoot orthosis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 22(2):258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinberg B, Nikitczuk J, Patel S, Patritti B, Mavroidis C, Bonato P, Canavan P (2007) Design, control and human testing of an active knee rehabilitation orthotic device. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 4126–4133

  19. Cai D, Bidaud P, Hayward V, Gosselin F (2009) Design of self-adjusting orthoses for rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 14th IASTED international conference on robotics and applications, Cambridge. MA, USA, pp 215–223

  20. Cai VAD, Bidaud P, Hayward V, Gosselin F, Desailly Eric (2011) Self-adjusting, isostatic exoskeleton for the human knee joint. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 612-618

  21. Celebi B, Yalcin M, Patoglu V (2013) ASSISTON-KNEE: a self-aligning knee exoskeleton. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2013, Japan, pp 996–1002

  22. Jarasse N, Morel G (2011) Connecting a human limb to an exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Robot 28(3):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ergin MA, Patoglu V, Self-Adjusting Knee Exoskeleton A, for Robot-Assisted Treatment of Knee Injuries, Proc. IEEE, RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, September 25–30, 2011. San Francisco. CA, USA, pp 4917–4922

  24. Schorsch JF, Keemink AQL, Stienen AHA, van der Helm FCT, Abbink DA (2014) A novel self-aligning mechanism to decouple force and torques for a planar exoskeleton joint. Mech Sci 5:2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stienen AHA, Hekman EEG, van der Helm FCT, van der Kooij H (2009) Self-aligning exoskeleton axes through decoupling of joint rotations and translations. IEEE Trans Robot 25:628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding X, Dai JS (2010) Compliance analysis of mechanisms with spatial continuous compliance in the context of screw theory and Lie groups. J Mech Eng Sci Proc I MechE Part C 224(11):2493–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinzel GL, Hall AS, Hillberry BM (1972) Measurement of the total motion between two body segments—i. analytical development. J Biomech 5:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viet Anh Dung Cai.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 700 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 645 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, V.A.D., Bidaud, P., Hayward, V. et al. Self-adjustment mechanisms and their application for orthosis design. Meccanica 52, 713–728 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0574-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0574-0

Keywords

Navigation