Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical study of the frequency shifts of micro and nano clamped–clamped beam resonators due to an added mass

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present analytical formulations to calculate the induced resonance frequency shifts of electrically actuated clamped–clamped micro and nano (Carbon nanotube) beams due to an added mass. Based on the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, we investigate the linear dynamic responses of the beams added masses, which are modeled as discrete point masses. Analytical expressions based on perturbation techniques and a one-mode Galerkin approximation are developed to calculate accurately the frequency shifts under a DC voltage as a function of the added mass and position. The analytical results are compared to numerical solution of the eigenvalue problem. Results are shown for the fundamental as well as the higher-order modes of the beams. The results indicate a significant increase in the frequency shift, and hence the sensitivity of detection, when scaling down to nano scale and using higher-order modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Bhattacharyya P, Basu P, Mondal B, Saha H (2008) A low power MEMS gas sensor based on nanocrystalline ZnO thin films for sensing methane. Microelectron Reliab 48:1772–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Yu H, Gan X, Xia X, Xu P, Li J et al (2009) Integrated MEMS/NEMS resonant cantilevers for ultrasensitive biological detection. J Sens 2009:231–240

  3. Park K, Kim N, Morisette DT, Aluru N, Bashir R (2012) Resonant MEMS mass sensors for measurement of microdroplet evaporation. Microelectromech Syst J 21:702–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramasamy M, Liang C, Prorok B (2011) Magneto-mechanical MEMS sensors for bio-detection. In: Proulx T (ed) MEMS and nanotechnology, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–15

  5. Lavrik NV, Sepaniak MJ, Datskos PG (2004) Cantilever transducers as a platform for chemical and biological sensors. Rev Sci Instrum 75:2229–2253

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Waggoner PS, Craighead HG (2007) Micro-and nanomechanical sensors for environmental, chemical, and biological detection. Lab Chip 7:1238–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suja K, Raveendran ES, Komaragiri R (2013) Investigation on better sensitive silicon based MEMS pressure sensor for high pressure measurement. Int J Computer Appl 72(8):40–47. doi: 10.5120/12517-9008

  8. Ganesan AV (2013) A novel MEMS based immunosensor for ebola virus detection. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition IMECE2013, November 15–21, San Diego, California, USA

  9. Gau J-J, Lan EH, Dunn B, Ho C-M, Woo JC (2001) A MEMS based amperometric detector for E. coli bacteria using self-assembled monolayers. Biosens Bioelectron 16:745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilic B, Czaplewski D, Zalalutdinov M, Craighead H, Neuzil P, Campagnolo C et al (2001) Single cell detection with micromechanical oscillators. J Vac Sci Technol B 19:2825–2828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park K, Millet LJ, Kim N, Li H, Jin X, Popescu G et al (2010) Measurement of adherent cell mass and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:20691–20696

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park K, Millet L, Kim N, Li H, Hsia K, Aluru N et al (2011) MEMS mass sensors with uniform sensitivity for monitoring cellular apoptosis. In: 2011 16th International solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems conference (TRANSDUCERS), pp 759–762

  13. Wu G, Datar RH, Hansen KM, Thundat T, Cote RJ, Majumdar A (2001) Bioassay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using microcantilevers. Nat Biotechnol 19:856–860

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrascosa LG, Moreno M, Álvarez M, Lechuga LM (2006) Nanomechanical biosensors: a new sensing tool. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 25:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavrik NV, Datskos PG (2003) Femtogram mass detection using photothermally actuated nanomechanical resonators. Appl Phys Lett 82:2697–2699

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen KM, Thundat T (2005) Microcantilever biosensors. Methods 37:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raiteri R, Grattarola M, Butt H-J, Skládal P (2001) Micromechanical cantilever-based biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 79:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouchaala A, Nayfeh AH, Younis MI (2016) Frequency shifts of micro and nano cantilever beam resonators due to added mass. J Dyn Syst Meas Control (in press)

  19. Dorsey K, Bedair S, Fedder G (2014) Gas chemical sensitivity of a CMOS MEMS cantilever functionalized via evaporation driven assembly. J Micromech Microeng 24:075001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rochus V, Wang B, Chaudhuri A, Helin P, Severi S, Rottenberg X (2015) Fast analytical design of Poly-SiGe MEMS pressure sensors. In: 16th International conference on thermal, mechanical and multi-physics simulation and experiments in microelectronics and microsystems (EuroSimE), pp 1–4

  21. Brown ER (1998) RF-MEMS switches for reconfigurable integrated circuits. Microw Theory Tech IEEE Trans 46:1868–1880

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pourkamali S, Hashimura A, Abdolvand R, Ho GK, Erbil A, Ayazi F (2003) High-Q single crystal silicon HARPSS capacitive beam resonators with self-aligned sub-100-nm transduction gaps. Microelectromech Syst J 12:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahafrooz A, Hajjam A, Tousifar B, Pourkamali S (2010) Thermal actuation, a suitable mechanism for high frequency electromechanical resonators. In: IEEE 23rd international conference micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS), pp 200–203

  24. Gupta A, Akin D, Bashir R (2004) Single virus particle mass detection using microresonators with nanoscale thickness. Appl Phys Lett 84:1976–1978

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Venstra W, Westra H, Gavan KB, Van der Zant H (2009) Magnetomotive drive and detection of clamped–clamped mechanical resonators in water. Appl Phys Lett 95:263103

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Patrascu M, Pettine J, Karabacak D, Vandecasteele M, Brongersma S, Crego-Calama M (2011) Oscillator-based volatile detection system using doubly-clamped micromechanical resonators. Procedia Eng 25:1533–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aboelkassem Y, Nayfeh AH, Ghommem M (2010) Bio-mass sensor using an electrostatically actuated microcantilever in a vacuum microchannel. Microsyst Technol 16:1749–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nayfeh AH, Ouakad H, Najar F, Choura S, Abdel-Rahman E (2010) Nonlinear dynamics of a resonant gas sensor. Nonlinear Dyn 59:607–618

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Younis MI, Alsaleem F (2009) Exploration of new concepts for mass detection in electrostatically-actuated structures based on nonlinear phenomena. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 4:021010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Münzer AM, Michael ZP, Star A (2013) Carbon nanotubes for the label-free detection of biomarkers. ACS Nano 7:7448–7453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heller I, Janssens AM, Männik J, Minot ED, Lemay SG, Dekker C (2008) Identifying the mechanism of biosensing with carbon nanotube transistors. Nano Lett 8:591–595

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. He H, Pham-Huy LA, Dramou P, Xiao D, Zuo P, Pham-Huy C (2013) Carbon nanotubes: applications in pharmacy and medicine. BioMed Res Int 2013:578290. doi:10.1155/2013/578290

  33. Arash B, Wang Q (2013) Detection of gas atoms with carbon nanotubes. Sci Rep 3. doi:10.1038/srep01782

  34. Elishakoff I, Versaci C, Maugeri N, Muscolino G (2011) Clamped-free single-walled carbon nanotube-based mass sensor treated as Bernoulli-Euler beam. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 2:021001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sazonova V, Yaish Y, Üstünel H, Roundy D, Arias TA, McEuen PL (2004) A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. Nature 431:284–287

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaste J, Eichler A, Moser J, Ceballos G, Rurali R, Bachtold A (2012) A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution. Nat Nanotechnol 7:301–304

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Y, Liu G, Han X (2005) Transverse vibrations of double-walled carbon nanotubes under compressive axial load. Phys Lett A 340:258–266

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Ouakad HM, Younis MI (2010) Nonlinear dynamics of electrically actuated carbon nanotube resonators. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 5:011009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Younis MI (2011) MEMS linear and nonlinear statics and dynamics. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Nayfeh AH, Mook DT (2008) Nonlinear oscillations. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Nayfeh AH (1981) Introduction to perturbation techniques. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Younis MI, Abdel-Rahman EM, Nayfeh A (2003) A reduced-order model for electrically actuated microbeam-based MEMS. Microelectromech Syst J 12:672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Abdel-Rahman EM, Younis MI, Nayfeh AH (2002) Characterization of the mechanical behavior of an electrically actuated microbeam. J Micromech Microeng 12:759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bouchaala AM, Younis MI (2015) A model of electrostatically actuated MEMS and carbon nanotubes resonators for biological mass detection. In: Fakhfakh T, Daly HB, Aifaoui N, Chaari F (eds) Design and modeling of mechanical systems-II. Springer, Berlin, pp 501–512

  45. Hajjaj AZ, Ramini A, Younis MI (2015) Experimental and analytical study of highly tunable electrostatically actuated resonant beams. J Micromech Microeng 25:125015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Teva J, Abadal G, Torres F, Verd J, Perez-Murano F, Barniol N (2006) A femtogram resolution mass sensor platform based on SOI electrostatically driven resonant cantilever. Part II: sensor calibration and glycerine evaporation rate measurement. Ultramicroscopy 106:808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmid S, Dohn S, Boisen A (2010) Real-time particle mass spectrometry based on resonant micro strings. Sensors 10:8092–8100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hayt WH, Buck JA (2001) Engineering electromagnetics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gabrielson B (1993) Mechanical–thermal noise in acoustic and vibration sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 40:903–909

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nyquist H (1928) Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys Rev 32:110

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad I. Younis.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Parallel plate theory

The expressions of the electrostatic force in clamped–clamped microbeam and carbon nanotube are derived here. The expressions are derived based on the parallel plates assumption for the microbeam and based on a cylinder interacting with a plate for the CNT.

We assume that the electric field lines between the two parallel plates are perpendicular, which means neglecting the fringing field effect close to the edges.

A voltage source V of load is assumed. The electric charge Q and potential energy E inside the capacitor can be written in the following expressions, respectively [39, 48].

$$Q = C({\text{z}}){\text{V}}$$
(35)
$$E = \frac{{V^{2} }}{2}C({\text{z}})$$
(36)

The electrostatic force \(F_{e}\) between the two electrodes in Fig. 9 for both cases can be obtained as [39, 48]

$$F_{e} = - \frac{{\partial E({\text{z}})}}{\partial z} = \frac{{V^{2} }}{2}\frac{{\partial C({\text{z}})}}{\partial z}$$
(37)
Fig. 9
figure 9

Schematic of a parallel-plate capacitor, and b a cylinder-plate capacitor

The expression of the capacitance \(C({\text{z}})\) depends on the geometry of the two electrodes. First, the case of two parallel electrodes is considered shown in Fig. 9a. The capacitance is expressed as [39, 48]

$$C({\text{z}}) = \frac{{\varepsilon_{0} Lb}}{z}$$
(38)

where \(\varepsilon_{0} = 8.85 \times 10^{ - 12} ({\text{C}}^{2} /{\text{Nm}}^{2} )\) is the air permittivity. We substitute Eq. (38) into Eq. (37) and get the electrostatic force for the microbeam configuration

$$F_{e} = - \frac{{\varepsilon_{0} bLV^{2} }}{{2z^{2} }}$$
(39)

The case of a cylinder and a rectangular plate capacitor, such as in CNTs, as shown in Fig. 9b can be expressed as [48]

$$C({\text{z}}) = \frac{{2\pi \varepsilon_{0} L}}{{\cosh^{ - 1} \left( {1 + \frac{z}{R}} \right)}}$$
(40)

Finally, we substitute Eq. (40) into Eq. (37) to get the attractive force

$$F_{e} = - \frac{{\pi \varepsilon_{0} LV^{2} }}{{\sqrt {z\left( {z + 2R} \right)} \left( {\cosh^{ - 1} \left( {1 + \frac{z}{R}} \right)} \right)^{2} }}$$
(41)

Appendix 2: Noise analysis

Based on [49, 50], we derive the noise analysis procedure used to compare with the results of Tables 2 and 4 and to check that the induced frequencies due to added mass are above the minimum detectable frequency due to thermal fluctuations around the sensor.

The equation of motion of a mass-spring-damper system, of mass m, stiffness K, and damping coefficient c, driven by a noise force \(F_{noise}\) is written as

$$m{\ddot{x}} + c\dot{x} + Kx = F_{noise}$$
(42)

The kinetic energy E stored in the resonator is written as

$$E = \frac{1}{2}m\bar{v}_{n}^{2}$$
(43)

where \(\bar{v}_{n}^{2}\) is the mean square velocity. Then we write the equation of motion in terms of velocity, we apply the Laplace transformation

$$\bar{v}_{n}^{{}} = \frac{dx}{dt} = sx$$
(44)
$$s \times m\bar{v}_{n}^{{}} + c\bar{v}_{n}^{{}} + \frac{K}{s}\omega = \bar{F}_{noise}$$
(45)

We set \(s = j\omega\).Thus, the mean square velocity due to noise generator \(\bar{F}_{noise}\) is written as

$$\bar{v}_{n}^{2} = \frac{{\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} }}{{c^{2} + \left( {\omega_{{}} m - \frac{K}{\omega }} \right)^{2} }}$$
(46)

The previous equation can be written as

$$\bar{v}_{n}^{2} = \frac{1}{{c^{2} }}\frac{{\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} }}{{1 + Q^{2} \left( {\frac{\omega }{{\omega_{0} }} - \frac{{\omega_{0} }}{\omega }} \right)^{2} }}$$
(47)

where \(\omega_{0} = \sqrt {K/m}\) is the resonance frequency and \(Q = \omega_{0} \frac{m}{c}\) is the quality factor.Then, the kinetic energy stored in the resonator is expressed as

$$E = \frac{1}{2}m\bar{v}_{n}^{2} = \frac{1}{4\pi c}\int_{0}^{\infty } {\frac{{\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} Qd\left( {\frac{f}{{f_{0} }}} \right)}}{{1 + Q^{2} \left( {\frac{f}{{f_{0} }} - \frac{{f_{0} }}{f}} \right)^{2} }}}$$
(48)

The integral in (48) is calculated as

$$\int_{0}^{\infty } {\frac{{^{{}} Q_{{}} d\left( {\frac{f}{{f_{0} }}} \right)}}{{1 + Q^{2} \left( {\frac{f}{{f_{0} }} - \frac{{f_{0} }}{f}} \right)^{2} }}} = \frac{\pi }{2}$$
(49)

Based on the Equipartition theorem; E can be expressed as

$$E = \frac{1}{2}k_{B} T$$
(50)

where \(k_{B} = 1.3806488 \times 10^{ - 23} \,{\text{m}}^{2} \,{\text{kg}}\,{\text{s}}^{ - 2} \,{\text{K}}^{ - 1}\) is the Boltzmann constant and T the temperature.

Finally, the force noise generator is expressed as

$$\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} = 4k_{B} Tc$$
(51)

Using Eqs. (42) and (51) the noise spectrum equation can be written as

$$\left\langle {x_{n} } \right\rangle = \sqrt {\bar{x}_{n}^{2} } = \sqrt {\frac{{4k_{B} T_{{}} c}}{{c^{2} \omega^{2} + \left( {K - m\omega^{2} } \right)^{2} }}}$$
(52)

The maximum displacement noise spectral density is at the resonance frequency \(\left( {\omega = \omega_{0} } \right)\)

$$\left\langle {x_{n} } \right\rangle_{\hbox{max} } = \sqrt {\bar{x}_{n}^{2} } = \sqrt {\frac{{4k_{B} T_{{}} Q}}{{2\pi f_{0} K}}}$$
(53)

2.1 Density of frequency noise

The force gradient acting on the resonator of the level \(F_{noise}^{{\prime }}\) changes the spring constant and shifts the resonance frequency

$$\omega_{0} = \left( {\frac{K}{m}} \right)^{{\frac{1}{2}}}$$
(54)
$$\omega_{0}^{{\prime }} = \omega_{0} \times \left( {1 + \frac{{F_{noise}^{{\prime }} }}{K}} \right)^{{\frac{1}{2}}}$$
(55)

where \(F_{noise}^{{\prime }} = \sqrt {\frac{{\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} }}{{\overline{x}_{noise}^{2} }}} = K^{\prime}\), which is the spring constant due to the noise force generator (\(\left[ {F_{noise}^{{\prime }} } \right] = \frac{N}{m}\)).Using Taylor series expansion of Eq. (55) and retaining the first term yield

$$\omega_{0}^{{\prime }} \approx \omega_{0} \times \left( {1 + \frac{{F_{noise}^{{\prime }} }}{2K}} \right)$$
(56)

The frequency shift can be expressed as

$$\delta \omega = \omega_{0} - \omega_{0}^{{\prime }}$$
(57)

Then,

$$\left( {\frac{\delta \omega }{{\omega_{0} }}} \right)^{2} = \left( { - \frac{{F_{noise}^{{\prime }} }}{2K}} \right)^{2} = \left( {\frac{{F_{noise}^{{\prime }} }}{2K}} \right)^{2}$$
(58)
$$\left( {\frac{\delta \omega }{{\omega_{0} }}} \right)^{2} = \frac{{\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} }}{{4K\bar{x}_{noise}^{2} }}$$
(59)

Using (51), the force due to noise can be expressed as

$$\bar{F}_{noise}^{2} = \frac{{4k_{B}^{{}} TK}}{{Q\omega_{0} }}$$
(60)

Finally, the smallest detectable frequency shift, in Hz \(\delta f_{noise} = \delta \omega /2\pi\), due to noise can be obtained from (59) and (60) as

$$\delta f_{noise} = \frac{1}{{\bar{x}_{noise}^{{}} }}\sqrt {\frac{{f_{0} k_{B} T}}{2\pi QK}}$$
(61)

2.2 Minimum detectable mass change

In order to calculate the minimum detectable mass, one can write the frequency \(f_{0}\) and the frequency after mass adsorption \(f_{1}\).

$$f_{0} = \frac{1}{2\pi }\sqrt {\frac{K}{m}} ;\quad f_{1} = f_{0} - \delta f_{noise} = \frac{1}{2\pi }\sqrt {\frac{K}{{m + M_{\hbox{min} } }}}$$
(62)

We manipulate (62) in order to find the expression of the minimum detectable mass \(M_{\hbox{min} }\)

$$M_{\hbox{min} } = \frac{K}{{4\pi^{2} }}\left( {\frac{1}{{f_{1}^{2} }} - \frac{1}{{f_{0}^{2} }}} \right)$$
(63)

Using (53), (61), and (63) for the case of a clamped–clamped beam with the geometrical properties shown in Table 1, we obtain the results in Table 5.

Table 5 Natural frequency, quality factor, maximum noise displacement, minimum detectable frequency, and minimum detectable mass for different modes of vibration

The objective of the noise analysis is to determine the minimum detectable frequency and minimum detectable mass that the sensor is able to detect. In Table 5, we calculate in the fifth column the minimum detectable frequencies based on the developed theory in “Appendix 2”. The results using the perturbation techniques (Num. Pert.) are considered as the most accurate results. For the first mode of vibration of a clamped–clamped microbeam, from Table 5 \(\delta f_{{_{noise} }}^{1st} = 60.24_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\). In order to find the minimum detectable number of E. coli, which corresponds to the minimum detectable frequency we use the linear relationship between the added mass and the induced frequency shift in Eq. (31). In Table 2 we recall that the frequency shift induced from 50 E. coli is \(\delta f_{50E.coli} = 29.77_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\).Hence, we need at least 102 E. coli to induce a frequency shift \(\delta f_{{_{102E.coli} }}^{1st} = 60.73_{{}} [Hz]\), which is above the noise level \(\delta f_{{_{noise} }}^{1st} = 60.24_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\). The same method has been used for the different modes of vibration. We find that we need at least 4 E. coli to induce a frequency shift \(\delta f_{{_{4E.coli} }}^{3rd} = 11_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\), which is above the noise level of the third mode of vibrations \(\delta f_{{_{noise} }}^{3rd} = 9.3_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\). Finally, for the fifth mode of vibration, the microbeam-based mass sensor is able to detect a single E. coli inducing a frequency shift \(\delta f_{{_{1E.coli} }}^{5rd} = 6.67_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\), which is above the calculated noise \(\delta f_{{_{noise} }}^{5th} = 2.296_{{}} [{\text{Hz}}]\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouchaala, A., Nayfeh, A.H. & Younis, M.I. Analytical study of the frequency shifts of micro and nano clamped–clamped beam resonators due to an added mass. Meccanica 52, 333–348 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0412-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0412-4

Keywords

Navigation