Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 51, Issue 9, pp 2099–2110 | Cite as

Upper bound analysis of wire drawing through a twin parabolic die

  • Shun Hu Zhang
  • Xiao Dong Chen
  • Jian Zhou
  • De Wen Zhao
Article
  • 196 Downloads

Abstract

According to the demand of stream function, a twin parabolic die as a streamline for wire drawing was designed and its kinematically admissible velocity field was then developed. Using the specific energy rate of MY (mean yield) criterion, the mathematical expression of internal deformation energy rate is obtained. Through surface integral of the proposed velocity field, the friction energy rate is also determined. Based on upper bound method, an analytical solution of drawing force is ultimately obtained. The effect of percentage reduction and die semi-angle on the drawing force are discussed. Comparison shows that the calculated drawing forces of the proposed die closely match its numerical drawing forces, and are the lowest compared with those based on conical die, hyperbolic die and elliptic die.

Keywords

Twin parabolic die MY criterion Drawing force Surface integral Analytical solution 

List of symbols

J*

Externally supplied energy rate

k

Shear yield stress

L

Length of land of die

l

Length of contact arc

m

Friction factor

\(n_{\sigma }\)

Stress state coefficient

\(R_{0} ,R,R_{1}\)

Radii at entry, in deformation zone, and at exit

U

Flow volume per second of the deformation part

\(v_{0} ,v_{1}\)

Horizontal velocities at entry and exit

\(v_{z} ,v_{r} ,v_{\theta }\)

Velocity components in z, r, θ directions

vt

Velocity of a particle at a point

\(\varDelta v_{t}\)

Tangential discontinuity along die surface

\(\left( {v_{r} } \right)_{L} ,\;\left( {v_{r} } \right)_{R}\)

Radial velocity components on the left and right sides of the BE section

\(\dot{W}_{f}\)

Friction energy rate

\(\dot{W}_{f1} ,\dot{W}_{f2} ,\dot{W}_{f}\)

Friction energy rates in zone I and zone II, and in the total zone

\(\dot{W}_{s1}\)

Shear energy rate on the entry and exit section

\(\dot{W}_{s2}\)

Shear energy rate on the conjunction section

\(\dot{W}_{s}\)

Total shear energy rate

\(\dot{W}_{i1} ,\dot{W}_{i2} ,\dot{W}_{i}\)

Internal deformation energy rate in zone I, II and in the total zone

α

Die semi-angle, \(\alpha = \arctan \left( {{{\varDelta R} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\varDelta R} l}} \right. \kern-0pt} l}} \right)\)

\(\alpha_{opt}\)

Optimal die semi-angle

\(\varDelta R\)

Absolute radius reduction,\(\varDelta R = R_{0} - R_{1}\)

λ

Percentage reduction, \(\lambda = {{\varDelta R} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\varDelta R} {R_{0} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {R_{0} }}\)

\(\dot{\varepsilon }_{z} ,\dot{\varepsilon }_{r} ,\dot{\varepsilon }_{\theta }\)

Strain rate components in z, r, θ directions

\(\dot{\varepsilon }_{\hbox{max} } ,\dot{\varepsilon }_{\hbox{min} }\)

Maximum and minimum strain rate components

\(\eta\)

Elongation coefficient of drawing, \(\eta = \left( {{{R_{0} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{R_{0} } {R_{1} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {R_{1} }}} \right)^{2}\)

\(\sigma_{s} ,\;D\left( {\dot{\varepsilon }_{ij} } \right)\)

Yield stress and specific plastic energy rate

\(\sigma_{f}\)

Externally supplied drawing stress

\(\sigma_{zb}\)

Back tension stress

\(\sigma_{\hbox{max} }\)

Maximum of Mises equivalent stress

\(\tau_{f}\)

Frictional shear stress between the die and the workpiece

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51504156), the Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20140334), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 14KJB460024) and the Project Funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014M561707). The authors also wish to acknowledge valuable suggestions from reviewers.

References

  1. 1.
    Richmond O, Devenpeck ML (1962) A die profile for maximum efficiency in strip drawing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth US national congress of applied mechanics ASME 1962, New York, pp 1053–1057Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avitzur B (1963) Analysis of wire drawing and extrusion through conical dies of small cone angle. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 85:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avitzur B (1964) Analysis of wire drawing and extrusion through conical dies of large cone angle. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 86:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avitzur B (1964) Flow characteristics through conical converging dies. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 88:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campos HB, Cetlin PR (1998) The influence of die semi-angle and the coefficient of friction on the uniform tensile elongation of drawn copper bars. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Critrescru N (1980) On the optimum die angle in fast wire drawing. J Mech Work Technol 3:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panteghini A, Genna F (2010) An engineering analytical approach to the design of cold wire drawing processes for strain-hardening materials. Int J Mater Form 3:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eivani AR, Karimi Taheri A (2008) The effect of dead metal zone formation on strain and extrusion force during equal channel angular extrusion. Comput Mater Sci 42:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chevalier L (1992) Prediction of defects in metal forming: application to wire drawing. J Mat Proc Tech 32:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodarzi Hosseinabadi H, Serajzadeh S (2011) A coupled stream function-finite element analysis for wire drawing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luis CJ, Leon J, Luri R (2005) Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes. J Mater Process Technol 164/165:12181225Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen DC, Huang JY (2007) Design of brass alloy drawing process using Taguchi method. Mater Sci Eng 464:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Majzoobi GH, Fereshteh Saniee F, Aghili A (2008) An investigation into the effect of redundant shear deformation in bar drawing. J Mater Process Technol 201:128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen CT, Ling FF (1968) Upper bound solutions to axisymmetric extrusion problems. Int J Mech Sci 10:863–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmerman Z, Avitzur B (1970) Metal flow through conical converging dies-a lower upper bound approach using generalized boundaries of in plastic zone. ASME J Eng Ind 92:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srinivasan R, Gunasekera JS, Gegel HL, Doraivelu SM (1990) Extrusion through controlled strain rate dies. J Mater Shaping Technol 8(2):133–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang DY, Han CH, Lee BC (1985) The use of generalized deformation boundaries for the analysis of axisymmetric extrusion through curved dies. Int J Mech Sci 27:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang DY, Han CH (1987) A new formulation of generalized velocity field for axisymmetric forward extrusion through arbitrarily curved dies. ASME J Eng Ind 109:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen CT, Ling FF (1968) Upper bound solutions to axisymmetric extrusion problems. Int J Mech Sci 10:863–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagpal V (1974) General kinematically admissible velocity fields for some axisymmetric metal forming problems. ASME J Eng Ind 96:1197–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen CC, Oh SI, Kobayashi S (1977) Ductile fracture in axisymmetric extrusion and drawing-Part I: deformation mechanics of extrusion and drawing metal. ASME J Eng Ind 101:369–377Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu TS, Chung NL (1990) Extrusion analysis and workability prediction using finite element method. Comput Struct 36:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim NH, Kang CG, Kim BM (2001) Die design optimization for axisymmetric hot extrusion of metal matrix composites. Int J Mech Sci 43:1507–1520CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin Z, Juchen X, Xinyun W, Guoan H (2003) Optimization of die profile for improving die life in the hot extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 142:659–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gordon WA, Van Tyne CJ, Moon YH (2007) Axisymmetric extrusion through adaptable dies-Part I: flexible velocity fields and power terms. Int J Mech Sci 49:86–95CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gordon WA, Van Tyne CJ, Moon YH (2007) Axisymmetric extrusion through adaptable dies-Part II: comparison of velocity fields. Int J Mech Sci 49:96–103CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gordon WA, Van Tyne CJ, Moon YH (2007) Axisymmetric extrusion through adaptable dies-Part III: minimum pressure streamlined die shapes. Int J Mech Sci 49:104–115CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gordon WA, Van Tyne CJ, Moon YH (2007) Overview of adaptable die design for extrusions. Int J Mech Sci 49:96–103CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hillier MJ, Johnson W (1963) Plane strain extrusion through partially rough curved dies. Int J Mech Sci 5:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Avitzur B (1968) Metal forming: processes and analysis. McGraw-Hill Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barata Marques MJM, Martins PAF (1989) A solution to plane strain extrusion by the upper bound approach and the weighted residuals method. Int J Mech Sci 31:395–406CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haghighat H, Amjadian P (2011) A generalized velocity field for plane strain extrusion through arbitrarily curved dies. J Manuf Sci Eng 133:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao DW, Zhao HJ, Wang GD (1995) Curvilinear integral of the velocity field of drawing and extrusion through elliptic die profile. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 5:79–83Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao DW, Wang GD, Zhong J (1996) Surface integral analysis of axis-symmetric drawing through hyperbolic die profile. J Appl Sci 14(2):224–227 (in Chineses) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao ZY (1980) Plastic deformation of metals and rolling theory. Metallurgical Industrial Publishing House, Shenyang (in Chineses) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao DW, Liu XH, Wang GD (2002) Yield criterion based on the mean function of Tresca and Twin Shear stress yield functions. J Northeast Univ (Natural Science) 23:976–979Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang SH, Song BN, Wang XN et al (2014) Analysis of plate rolling by MY criterion and global weighted velocity field. Appl Math Model 38(14):3485–3494MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shun Hu Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiao Dong Chen
    • 2
  • Jian Zhou
    • 1
  • De Wen Zhao
    • 3
  1. 1.Shagang School of Iron and SteelSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina
  3. 3.State Key Lab of Rolling and AutomationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations