Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 50, Issue 8, pp 1949–1959 | Cite as

Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency

  • Zbyněk StreckerEmail author
  • Ivan Mazůrek
  • Jakub Roupec
  • Milan Klapka
Article

Abstract

This paper tries to find the reasons of differences between results from semiactive suspension simulations and from real measurements. Simulations of semiactive algorithms which have already been published in many scientific papers have showned a great potential for improvement of the suspension quality. However, experiments with suspension controlled by semiactive algorithms which are supposed to improve grip did not bring any benefits. The reason of algorithm failure seems to be the response time of the damper used in the suspension. This paper compares the quality of suspension using three different semiactive algorithms (Skyhook, Groundhook, modified Groundhook) and passive settings for different damping levels. All the simulations were conducted for three different response times of MR damper: 1.5, 8 and 20 ms. Response time 20 ms is usual for commercial MR dampers control. Response time 8 ms corresponds to commercial MR dampers which are controlled by the newly developed PWM controller. Response time 1.5 ms corresponds to the fastest available MR devices. Simulations show a significant influence of the MR damper response time on the suspension quality if semiactive algorithms are used. The simulations are confirmed by measurements on a quarter car suspension controlled by modified Groundhook algorithm using MR damper with response time 8 and 20 ms.

Keywords

MR damper Response time Semiactive algorithm  Modified Groundhook 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is an output of cooperation between FSI-S-14-2329, GAČR 13-31834P and NETME Centre, regional R&D centre built with the financial support from the Operational Programme Research and Development for Innovations within the project NETME Centre (New Technologies for Mechanical Engineering), Reg. No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0002 and, in the follow-up sustainability stage, supported through NETME CENTRE PLUS (LO1202) by financial means from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports under the “National Sustainability Programme I”.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmadian M, Goncalves FD, Sandu C (2005) An experimental analysis of suitability of various semiactive control methods for magneto-rheological vehicle suspensions. In: Smart structures and materials, international society for optics and photonics, pp 208–216Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balamurugan L, Jancirani J, Eltantawie M (2014) Generalized magnetorheological (mr) damper model and its application in semi-active control of vehicle suspension system. Int J Automot Technol 15(3):419–427. doi: 10.1007/s12239-014-0044-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eslaminasab N, Golnaraghi M (2007) The effect of time delay of the semi-active dampers on the performance of on-off control schemes. In: Proceedings of IMECE2007, ASMEGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goncalves FD, Ahmadian M, Carlson J (2006) Investigating the magnetorheological effect at high flow velocities. Smart Mater Struct 15(1):75ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karnopp D, Crosby MJ, Harwood RA (1974) Vibration control using semi-active force generators. ASME J Eng Ind 96(2):619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim RK, Hong KS (2007) Skyhook control using a full-vehicle model and four relative displacement sensors. In: International conference on control, automation and systems, 2007. IFCCAS’07. IEEE, pp 268–272Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koo JH, Ahmadian M, Setareh M (2003) Experimental evaluation of magnetorheological dampers for semi-active tuned vibration absorbers. In: Smart structures and materials, international society for optics and photonics, pp 83–91Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koo JH, Goncalves FD, Ahmadian M (2006) A comprehensive analysis of the response time of mr dampers. Smart Mater Struct 15(2):351ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maas J, Güth D (2011) Experimental investigation of the transient behavior of mr fluids. In: ASME (2011) conference on smart materials. ASME, adaptive structures and intelligent systemsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen Q, Choi S, Park Y (2012) An analytical approach to optimally design of electrorheological fluid damper for vehicle suspension system. Meccanica 47(7):1633–1647. doi: 10.1007/s11012-012-9544-3 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poussot-Vassal C, Spelta C, Sename O, Savaresi S, Dugard L (2012) Survey and performance evaluation on some automotive semi-active suspension control methods: a comparative study on a single-corner model. Annu Rev Control 36(1):148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spaggiari A, Dragoni E (2012) Efficient dynamic modelling and characterization of a magnetorheological damper. Meccanica 47(8):2041–2054. doi: 10.1007/s11012-012-9573-y CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strecker Z, Mazůrek I (2012) Semiactive damper in an experimental trolley suspension. In: Proceedings of the 53rd international conference of machine design departments, pp 281–286Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sulaiman S, Samin PM, Jamaluddin H, Rahman RA, Burhaumudin MS (2012) Groundhook control of semi-active suspension for heavy vehicle. Int J Res Eng Technol 1(3):146–152Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valášek M, Kortům W, Šika Z, Magdolen L, Vaculín O (1998) Development of semi-active road-friendly truck suspensions. Control Eng Pract 6(6):735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang E, Ying L, Wang W, Rakheja S, Chunyi S (2008) Semi-active control of vehicle suspension with magneto-rheological dampers: part i-controller synthesis and evaluation. Chin J Mech Eng 21(1):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang W, Song Y (2012) Nonlinear vibration semi-active control of automotive steering using magneto-rheological damper. Meccanica 47(8):2027–2039. doi: 10.1007/s11012-012-9572-z
  18. 18.
    Yang G, Spencer BF Jr, Jung HJ, Carlson JD (2004) Dynamic modeling of large-scale magnetorheological damper systems for civil engineering applications. J Eng Mech 130(9):1107–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yao G, Yap F, Chen G, Li W, Yeo S (2002) Mr damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system. Mechatronics 12(7):963–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbyněk Strecker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ivan Mazůrek
    • 1
  • Jakub Roupec
    • 1
  • Milan Klapka
    • 1
  1. 1.Brno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations