, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 11–24 | Cite as

Development and modeling of filled silicone architectured membranes

  • M. Rebouah
  • G. Chagnon
  • D. Favier


The main objective of this study is to generate anisotropic membranes stretched in their plane able to endure large deformations. In this perspective, different crenellated membranes were designed with a filled silicone rubber. The aim of this work is to build a constitutive equation which describes the mechanical behavior of such architectured membranes, by means of a simple decompostion of the strain energy. Since a filled silicone is used to make the architectured membrane, some non linear effects influence also the mechanical behavior of the structure. The main phenomenon is the Mullins effect and must be taken into account in the modeling. An equivalent constitutive equation is built for the architectured membrane by taking into account the mechanical behavior of the silicone and the geometrical parameters of the crenellated membrane. Firstly, a constitutive equation is chosen to describe the core of the membrane. Second, this equation is adapted to the behavior of the crenels and thirdly a coupling term describing the interactions between the crenels and the core of the membrane is developed. The implementation of the equivalent constitutive equation into a finite element code is finally validated on experimental data.


Architectured material Silicone rubber Stress-softening Constitutive equation 


  1. 1.
    Ashby M (2013) Designing architectured materials. Scr Mater 68:4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazant ZP, Oh BH (1986) Efficient numerical integration on the surface of a sphere. Z Angew Math Mech 66:37–49CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouaziz O (2013) Geometrically induced strain hardening. Scr Mater 68:28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouaziz O, Brechet Y, Embury JD (2008) Heterogeneous and architectured materials: a possible strategy for design of structural materials. Adv Eng Mater 10:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brechet Y, Embury J (2013) Architectured materials: expanding materials space. Scr Mater 68:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diani J, Brieu M, Gilormini P (2006) Observation and modeling of the anisotropic visco-hyperelastic behavior of a rubberlike material. Int J Solids Struct 43:3044–3056CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunlop JW, Fratzl P (2013) Multilevel architectures in natural materials. Scr Mater 68:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Federico S, Grillo A, Imatani S, Giaquinta G, Herzog W (2008) An energetic approach to the analysis of anisotropic hyperelastic materials. Int J Eng Sci 46:164–181CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Göktepe S, Acharya SNS, Wong J, Kuhl E (2010) Computational modeling of passive myocardium. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 27:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics—a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Machado G, Chagnon G, Favier D (2010) Analysis of the isotropic models of the Mullins effect based on filled silicone rubber experimental results. Mech Mater 42:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machado G, Favier D, Chagnon G (2012a) Determination of membrane stress–strain full fields of bulge tests from SDIC measurements. Theory, validation and experimental results on a silicone elastomer. Exp Mech 52:865–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Machado G, Chagnon G, Favier D (2012b) Induced anisotropy by the Mullins effect in filled silicone rubber. Mech Mater 50:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meunier L (2011) Contribution la conception, l’expérimentation et la modélisation de membranes hyperélastiques architcturées anisotropes. Ph.D. thesis, Université de GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11:582–592CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mullins L (1948) Effect of stretching on the properties of rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 21:281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Natali AN, Carniel EL, Gregersen H (2009) Biomechanical behaviour of oesophageal tissues: material and structural configuration, experimental data and constitutive analysis. Med Eng Phys. 31:1056–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nerurkar NL, Mauck RL, Elliott DM (2011) Modeling interlamellar interactions in angle-ply biologic laminates for annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10:973–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rebouah M, Machado G, Chagnon G, Favier D (2013) Anisotropic Mullins stress softening of a deformed silicone holey plate. Mech Res Commun 49:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reese S, Raible T, Wriggers P (2001) Finite element modelling of orthotropic material behaviour in pneumatic membranes. Int J Solids Struct 38:9525–9544CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rey T, Chagnon G, Le Cam J-B, Favier D (2013) Influence of the temperature on the mechanical behavior of unfilled and filled silicone rubbers above crystallization temperature. Polym Test 32:492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spencer AJM (1971) Theory of invariants. Contin Phys 1:239–352Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de Grenoble Alpes/CNRS/TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525GrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations