Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Condition monitoring of bones using piezo-transducers

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the feasibility of employing piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) patches as bio-medical sensors for monitoring condition of bones, through experimental studies on human and rabbit bones. Conductance signatures of PZT patches bonded to bones are acquired using the electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) technique, while the bones are subjected to varying conditions such as and density changes, occurrence of cracks and fracturing. The changes in the signature correlate fairly well with the changes in the condition of the bones. Finally, the effect of healing process is experimentally simulated on rabbit bones, which showed that the conductance signature of the bones shifted back towards the original state after rejoining. The overall results of the study demonstrate good prospects of using PZT patches as bio-medical sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soh CK, Tseng KKH, Bhalla S, Gupta A (2000) Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge. Smart Mater Struct 9:533–542

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giurgiutiu V, Zagrai AN (2002) Embedded self-sensing piezoelectric active sensors for on-line structural identification. ASME J Vib Acoust 124:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhalla S, Soh CK (2003) Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo-transducers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:1897–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park G, Farrar CR, di Scalia FL, Coccia S (2006) Performance assessment and validation of piezoelectric active-sensors in structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 15:1673–1683

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang YW, Lim YY, Soh CK (2008) Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: I. Experiment. Smart Mater Struct 17:035008

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhalla S, Gupta A, Bansal S, Garg T (2009) Ultra low cost adaptations of electro-mechanical impedance technique for structural health monitoring. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim YY, Bhalla S, Soh CK (2006) Structural identification and damage diagnosis using self-sensing piezo-impedance transducers. Smart Mater Struct 15:987–995

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bender JW, Friedman MD, Giurgiutiu V, Watson C, Fitzmaurice M, Yost ML (2006) The use of biomedical sensors to monitor capsule formation around soft tissue implants. Ann Plast Surg 56:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soh CK, Bhalla S (2005) Calibration of piezo-impedance transducers for strength prediction and damage assessment of concrete. Smart Mater Struct 14:671–684

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Erickson GM, Catanese J, Keaveny TM (2002) Evaluation of the biomechanical material properties of the femur. Anat Rec 268:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritchie RO, Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Ager JW, Balooch G, Kinney JH (2006) Fracture and ageing in bone: toughness and structural characterization. Strain 42:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhalla S, Bajaj S (2008) Bone characterization using piezo-transducers as bio-medical sensors. Strain 44:475–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laermann KH (2010) Assessment of structural integrity and durability—a task of experimental mechanics. Meccanica 45:167–174

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawiecki G (2001) Modal damping measurement for damage detection. Smart Mater Struct 10:466–471

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Christopoulou GE, Stavropoulou A, Anastassopoulos G, Panteiou SD, Papadaki E, Karamanos NK, Panagiotopoulos E (2006) Evaluation of modal damping factor as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis and its relation with serum osteocalcin and collagen I N-Telopeptide for monitoring the efficacy of alendronate in ovariectomized rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhalla S (2004) A mechanical impedance approach for structural identification, health monitoring and non-destructive evaluation using piezo-impedance transducers. Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ikeda T (1990) Fundamentals of piezoelectricity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liang C, Sun FP, Rogers CA (1994) Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 5:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park G, Cudney HH, Inman DJ (2000) Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. ASCE J Infrastruct Syst 6:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Winston HA, Sun F, Annigeri BS (2001) Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric active sensors. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 123:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. PI ceramic. http://www.piceramic.de. (2009)

  22. Agilent Technologies. http://www.agilent.com. (2009)

  23. Huang TS, Yang JJ, Li H, Kao CT (2002) The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. Biomaterials 23:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morrison C, Macnair R, MAcDonal C, Wykman A, Goldie I, Grant MH (1995) In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials 16:987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho KY, Dodou K (2007) Rheological studies on pressure- sensitive silicone adhesives and drug-in-adhesive layers as a means to characterise adhesive performance. Int J Pharm 333:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pidilite Industries Ltd. http://www.pidilite.net. (2009)

  27. Sakai T, Hoshiai S, Nakamachi E (2006) Biochemical compatibility of PZT piezoelectric ceramics covered with titanium thin film. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 8:1435–1437

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laroche G, Marois Y, Guidoin R, King MW, Martin L, How T, Douville Y (1995) Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as a biomaterial: from polymeric raw material to monofilament vascular suture. J Biomed Mater Res 12:1525–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fukada E, Yasuda I (1957) On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Phys Soc Jpn 12:1158–1162

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bassett CAL (1968) Biologic significance of piezoelectricity. Calcif Tissue Res 1:252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boemio G, Rizzo P, De Nardo L (2011) Assessment of dental implant stability by means of the electromechanical impedance. Smart Mater Struct 20:045008

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance provided by the undergraduate students, namely Amol Goel, Rahul Aggarwal, Anil Mittal Akash Goyal, Shefali and Megha during the performance of some of the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bhalla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhalla, S., Suresh, R. Condition monitoring of bones using piezo-transducers. Meccanica 48, 2233–2244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9740-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9740-9

Keywords

Navigation