Skip to main content

A discrete mechanical model of fractional hereditary materials

Abstract

Fractional hereditary materials are characterized for the presence, in the stress-strain relations, of fractional-order operators with order β∈[0,1]. In Di Paola and Zingales (J. Rheol. 56(5):983–1004, 2012) exact mechanical models of such materials have been extensively discussed obtaining two intervals for β: (i) Elasto-Viscous (EV) materials for 0≤β≤1/2; (ii) Visco-Elastic (VE) materials for 1/2≤β≤1. These two ranges correspond to different continuous mechanical models.

In this paper a discretization scheme based upon the continuous models proposed in Di Paola and Zingales (J. Rheol. 56(5):983–1004, 2012) useful to obtain a mechanical description of fractional derivative is presented. It is shown that the discretized models are ruled by a set of coupled first order differential equations involving symmetric and positive definite matrices. Modal analysis shows that fractional order operators have a mechanical counterpart that is ruled by a set of Kelvin-Voigt units and each of them provides a proper contribution to the overall response. The robustness of the proposed discretization scheme is assessed in the paper for different classes of external loads and for different values of β∈[0, 1].

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. 1.

    Di Paola M, Zingales M (2012) Exact mechanical models of fractional hereditary materials. J Rheol 56(5):983–1004

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nutting PG (1921) A new general law of deformation. J Franklin Inst 191:679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gemant A (1936) A method of analyzing experimental results obtained from elasto-viscous bodies. Physics 7:311–317

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Di Paola M, Pirrotta A, Valenza A (2011) Visco-elastic behavior through fractional calculus: an easier method for best fitting experimental results. J Mater Sci 43(12):799–806

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gerasimov AN (1949) A generalization of linear laws of deformation and its application to inner friction problems. Prikl Mat Meh 12:251–259 (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Scott Blair GW, Caffyn JE (1949) An application of the theory of quasi-properties to the treatment of anomalous strain-stress relations. Philos Mag 40(300):80–94

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Slonimsky GL (1961) On the law of deformation of highly elastic polymeric bodies. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 140(2):343–346 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1984) On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials. J Appl Mech 51:294–298

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schiessel H, Blumen A (1993) Hierarchical analogues to fractional relaxation equations. J Phys A, Math Gen 26:5057–5069

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schiessel H, Metzeler R, Blumen A, Nonnenmacher TF (1995) Generalized viscoelastic models: their fractional equations with solutions. J Phys A, Math Gen 28:6567–6584

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Heymans N, Bauwens JC (1994) Fractal rheological models and fractional differential equations for viscoelastic behavior. Rheol Acta 33:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1983) Fractional calculus—a different approach to the analysis of viscoelastically damped structures. AIAA J 21(5):741–748

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1986) On the fractional calculus model of viscoelastic behavior. J Rheol 30(1):133–155

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bagley RL (1989) Power law and fractional calculus model of viscoelasticity. AIAA J 27(10):1412–1417

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schmidt A, Gaul L (2002) Finite element formulation of viscoelastic constitutive equations using fractional time derivatives. Nonlinear Dyn 29(1):37–55

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Spanos PD, Evangelatos GI (2010) Response of a non-linear system with restoring forces governed by fractional derivatives—time domain simulation and statistical linearization solution. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(9):811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yuan L, Agrawal OP (2002) A numerical scheme for dynamic system containing fractional derivatives. J Vib Acoust 124(2):321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schmidt A, Gaul L (2006) On a critique of a numerical scheme for the calculation of fractionally damped dynamical systems. Mech Res Commun 33(1):99–107

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schmidt A, Gaul L (2006) On the numerical evaluation of fractional derivatives in multi-degree-of-freedom systems. Signal Process 86(10):2592–2601

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Flügge W (1967) Viscoelasticity. Blaisdell, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mainardi F (2010) Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity. Imperial College Press/World Scientific, London

    MATH  Book  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yueh W-C (2005) Eigenvalues of several tridiagonal matrices. Appl Math E-Notes 5:66–74

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kouchi S (2006) Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of tridiagonal matrices. Electron J Linear Algebra 15:115–133

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Oldham KB, Spainer J (1974) The fractional calculus: theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Caputo M (1967) Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent—II. Geophys J R Astron Soc 13:529–539. Reprinted recently in: Fract Calc Appl Anal 11(1):3–14, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Miller KS, Ross B (1993) An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. Wiley-InterScience, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Samko GS, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI (1993) Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications. Gordon & Breach, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hilfer R (2000) Application of fractional calculus in physics. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to research Grant No. PRIN2008, National Coordinator Professor A. Carpinteri. This financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Zingales.

Appendix: Fractional calculus

Appendix: Fractional calculus

In this appendix we introduce some fundamental concepts on fractional calculus.

The fractional calculus is the natural extension of ordinary differential calculus. In fact, it extends the concepts of derivation and integration to non-integer and complex order.

The fractional calculus was born in the 1695 when G.W. Leibniz introduced the half derivate concept in a note to G. de l’Hôpital [24]. Subsequent studies have focused by different mathematicians [25]: J.B.J. Fourier, P.S. Laplace, L. Euler, S.F. Lacorix, N.H. Abel, etc.

The first definition of fractional operator is probably attributable to J. Liouville, who in 1832 gave the impulse to research by formulating the definition of fractional derivative of exponential function. In 1847, an important contribution was given by G.F.B. Riemann, who introduced their own definition of fractional integral. Following, N.Ya. Sonin unified formulations of Liouville and Riemann from multiple Cauchy integration formula [25], obtaining the following expression of fractional integral:

(A.1)

Equation (A.1) is known in literature as a fractional integral of Riemann-Liouville, since ℜ(β)>0, and it is valid for β∈ℂ.

To obtain the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative just think that the derivative of order n can be considered as the derivative of order n+m of the mth primitive function, and then generalizing, we have:

$$ \bigl(\mathrm{D}_{a^+}^{\beta}f \bigr) (t)=\frac{1}{\varGamma (n-\beta )} \biggl({\frac{d}{dt}} \biggr)^n\int_a^t{ \frac{f(\tau)}{(t-\tau )^{\,\beta-n+1}}}\,d\tau $$
(A.2)

valid for (n−1)<ℜ(β)<n.

Another definition of fractional integro-differential operator was provided in 1967 by M. Caputo [26]. This definition is easier to handle for the solution of physical problems. The Caputo fractional derivative has the following expression:

$$ \bigl(_{\mathrm{C}}\mathrm{D}_{a^+}^{\beta}f \bigr) (t)= \frac{1}{\varGamma (n-\beta )}\int_a^t {\frac{f^{(n)}(\tau)}{{(t-\tau)^{\,\beta +1-n}}}} \,d\tau $$
(A.3)

Equation (A.3) is valid for (n−1)<β<n. The expression obtained is the result of an interpolation between the integer order derivatives, in fact, for βn, the expression becomes an nth derivative of f(t).

It can be observed that the expressions (A.3) and (A.2) coincide if we start from initial conditions zero (f(a)=0).

Another definition of fractional operator, which is suitable for the techniques of discretization, it’s known as Grünwald-Letnikov differintegral [25] and is given as

(A.4)

Equation (A.4) defines in the same time two different operators, fractional derivate (for β>0) and fractional integral (for β<0).

Many definitions of fractional operators exist but are not reported for brevity sake’s. For in-depth studies look at previous citied books and [2730].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Paola, M., Pinnola, F.P. & Zingales, M. A discrete mechanical model of fractional hereditary materials. Meccanica 48, 1573–1586 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-012-9685-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fractional calculus
  • Power-law
  • Hereditariness
  • Mechanical models
  • Discretized models
  • Eigenanalysis