Abstract
First the principles of mapping spatial points to surfaces is introduced in the context of the inverse kinematics of a general six revolute serial wrist partitioned robot. Then the advantage of choosing ideal frames is illustrated by showing that in the case of some architectures an image space formulation, though possible, may be an impediment to clear geometric insight and a satisfactory and much simpler solution. After showing how the general point mapping transformation is reduced to classical Blaschke-Grünwald planar mapping a novel three legged planar robot’s direct kinematics is solved in image space and then using conventional “distance” constraints. The purpose is to show why the latter approach yields spurious solutions and how the displacement pole rotation performed with kinematic mapping reliably avoids this problem. In conclusion certain other new and/or interesting reduced mobility parallel robots are discussed briefly to point out some advantages and insights gained with an image space approach. Particular effort is made to expose in detail how mapping simplifies and extends the solution of direct kinematics pertaining to Calvel’s “Delta” 3D translational robot.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Angeles J, Caro S, Khan W, Morozov A (2008) Kinetostatic design of an innovative Schönflies motion generator. J Mech Eng Sci 220:935–943
Blaschke W (1960) Kinematik und Quaternionen. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin
Bottema O, Roth B (1990) Theoretical kinematics. Dover, New York, ISBN 0-486-66346-9
Brunnthaler K, Pfurner M, Husty ML (2006) Synthesis of planar four-bar mechanisms. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 30(2):297–313
Clavel R (1988) Delta, a fast robot with parallel geometry. In: 18th int symp on industrial robots. IFS Publications, Lausanne, pp 91–100
Fanuc, Ltd. (2007) FANUC robot LR mate 200iC. http://www.fanuc.co.jp/en/product/new_product/2007/0701/0701robotlrmate200ic.html
Gauthier J-F (2008) Contributions to the optimum design of Schönflies motion generators. M Eng thesis, McGill University
Husty ML (1996) An algorithm for solving the direct kinematics of general Stewart-Gough platforms. Mech Mach Theory 31(4):365–380
Husty ML (2006) Algebraic methods in mechanisms analysis and synthesis. http://geometrie.uibk.ac.at/institutangehorig/dld/Alg-geom-husty-final.pdf, 18 pp
Husty M, Pfurner M, Schröcker H-P (2005) A new and efficient algorithm for the inverse kinematics of a general serial 6R manipulator. Mech Mach Theory 42(1):365–380
Husty ML, Pfurner M, Schröcker H-P, Brunnthaler K (2007) Algebraic methods in mechanism analysis and synthesis. Robotica 25(6):661–675
Nabat V, Rodriguez M, Company O, Pierrot F, Dauchez P (2005) Very fast Schoenflies motion generator. IEEE Pub 0-7803-9484-4/05, pp 365–370
Ottaviano EM, Husty ML, Ceccarelli M (2006) Identification of the workspace boundary of a general 3-R manipulator. J Mech Des 128(1):236–242
Pernkopf F, Husty ML (2006) Workspace analysis of Stewart-Gough-type parallel manipulators. J Mech Eng Sci 220(7):1019–1032
Schröcker H-P, Husty ML, McCarthy JMM (2007) Kinematic mapping based assembly mode evaluation of planar four-bar mechanisms. J Mech Des 129(9):924–929
Seo T, In W, Kim J (2009) A new planar 3-DOF parallel mechanism with continuous 360-degree rotational capability. J Mech Sci Technol, Korean Soc Mech Eng 23(11):3088–3094
Study E (1903) Die Geometrie der Dynamen. Leipzig
Zsombor-Murray PJ (2009) An improved approach to the kinematics of Clavel’s DELTA robot. http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~paul/Delta9Af.pdf, 6 pp
Zsombor-Murray PJ, Gfrerrer A (2010) A unified approach to direct kinematics of some reduced motion parallel manipulators. ASME J Mech Robot 2(2), 021006. doi:10.1115/1.4001095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zsombor-Murray, P., Gfrerrer, A. Mapping similarity between parallel and serial architecture kinematics. Meccanica 46, 183–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-010-9410-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-010-9410-0