Skip to main content
Log in

Inelastic deformations of stainless steel leaf springs-experiment and nonlinear analysis

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A stainless steel leaf spring is designed and constructed followed by its performance evaluation by experiment and non-linear analysis so that an insight into the optimum use of material can be made. Cantilever beams of uniform strength, popularly termed as leaf springs, undergo much larger deflections in comparison to a beam of constant cross-section; that needs inclusions of geometric non-linearity for rigorous analysis. This study deals with such a cantilever beam, but takes into account the material non-linearity as well. Experiments were conducted for such a cantilever beam, with highly non-linear stress-strain curves. In addition to the experiment, a computer code in ‘C’ has been developed using the Runge-Kutta technique for the purpose of simulation. Effective modulus-curvature relations are obtained from the non-linear stress-strain relations for different sections of the beam and used for the analysis. It is seen that non-linear stress-strain curve governs the bending of the beam. Importantly, non-linear analysis shows the stresses are not so high as predicted by the linear theory without end-shortening. Moreover, the tensile and compressive stresses are different in magnitude and both decrease along the span. Experimental load-deflection curves are found to be initially concave upward but, non-linear and convex upward at a high load. Comparison of the numerical results with the available experimental results from another research group and theory shows excellent agreement verifying the soundness of the entire numerical simulation scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b0,b:

width of the beam at fixed end and at any point on its span

e :

nominal strain for an axially loaded member

E :

Young’s modulus for the beam material

E″:

effective modulus of elasticity for the beam material

h :

height of the beam

h 1 :

distance from the neutral surface to the lower surface of beam

h 2 :

distance from the neutral surface to the upper surface of beam

I0,I:

moment of inertia of the beam’s cross-section at the fixed end and at any pint on its span.

L :

length of the beam

M,M b :

bending moments

P :

tip load

P 1 :

design load

P 2 :

a tip load higher than P 1

s :

curved length of beam

x :

horizontal distance measured from the fixed end

X H ,X L :

upper and lower limits of x

y :

stressed beam’s transverse deflection

v :

distance from the neutral surface

Z:

section modulus of beam

δ :

tip deflection

δ h :

end-shortening

δ 0 :

difference between original and changed lengths of an axially loaded member

ε :

elongation in the fiber

ε 1 :

elongation in the extreme fiber in the convex side

ε 2 :

elongation in the extreme fiber in the concave side

ε t ,ε c :

true strains in tension and compression, respectively

λ0,λ:

original and changed lengths of an axially loaded member

ρ :

radius of curvature of the neutral surface

Δ:

|ε 1|+|ε 2|

σ :

stress

σ d :

design stress

σ t :

tensile stress in the extreme fiber

σ c :

compressive stress in the extreme fiber

References

  1. Belendez T, Neipp C, Belendez A (2003) Numerical and experimental analysis of a cantilever beam: a laboratory project to introduce geometric nonlinearity in mechanics of materials. Int J Eng Educ 19:885–892

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belendez T, Perez-Polo M, Neipp C, Belendez A (2005) Numerical and experimental analysis of large deflections of cantilever beams under a combined load. Phys Scr T 118:61–65

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratus AS, Posvyanskii VP (2000) The optimum shape of a bending beam. J Appl Math Mech 64(6):993–1004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Brojan M, Videnic T, Kosel F (2009) Large deflections of nonlinearly elastic non-prismatic cantilever beams made from materials obeying the generalized Ludwick constitutive law. Meccanica, published online: 01 April 2009

  5. Guerrero N, Marante ME, Julio RP (2007) Model of local buckling in steel hollow structural elements subjected to biaxial bending. J Constr Steel Res 63(6):779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruusing A (2000) Analysis and optimization of loaded cantilever beam microactuators. Smart Mater Struct 9:186–196

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowser MA (2006), Non-linear Analysis of a superelastic shape memory alloy cantilever beam of variable cross-section. M.Sc.Eng. Thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Bangladesh

  8. Lee K (2002) Large deflections of cantilever beams of non-linear elastic material under a combined loading. Int J Non-linear Mech 37(3):439–443

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemaitre GR (1997) Equal curvature and equal constraint cantilevers: extensions of Euler and Clebsch formulas. Meccanica 32:493–503

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis G, Monasa F (1982) Large deflections of cantilever beams of non-linear materials of the Ludwick type subjected to an end moment. Int J Nonlinear Mech 17(1):1–6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan P, Ohsaki M, Tagawa H (2007) Shape optimization of H-beam flange for maximum plastic energy dissipation. ASCE J Struct Eng 133(8):1176–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahman MA, Kowser M (2007) Nonlinear analysis of cantilever shape memory alloy beams of variable cross-section. Smart Mater Struct 16:531–540

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahman MA, Chowdhury RK, Ahsan MMR (2005) Response of a slender cantilever beam with a circular hole-experiment and large deflection analysis. J Mech Eng 34:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman MA, Tani J, Afsar AM (2006) Postbuckling behaviour of stainless steel (SUS304) columns under loading-unloading cycles. J Constr Steel Res 62:812–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman MA, Rahman S, Hossain AHMZ (2007) Large deflection analysis of cantilever beams with an opening. Int J Appl Mech Eng Poland 12(1):169–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shatnawi AS, Sadder SA (2007) Exact large deflection analysis of nonprismatic cantilever beams of nonlinear bimodulus material subjected to tip moment. J Reinf Plast Compos 26(12):1253–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Timoshenko S (1955) Strength of materials-Part I. Van Nostrand, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Timoshenko S, Gere JM (1981) Theory of elastic stability. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai SH (2007) Mathematical analysis on a model for the rectangular cantilever beam. J Phys D, Appl Phys 40:6129–6137

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Ashiqur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahman, M.A., Kowser, M.A. Inelastic deformations of stainless steel leaf springs-experiment and nonlinear analysis. Meccanica 45, 503–518 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-009-9270-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-009-9270-7

Navigation