Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of C-terminal amidation on the efficacy and selectivity of antimicrobial and anticancer peptides

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cationic defence peptides show high therapeutic potential as antimicrobial and anticancer agents. Some of these peptides carry a C-terminal amide moiety which has been shown to be required for antimicrobial activity. However, whether this is a general requirement or whether C-terminal amidation is required for the anticancer activity of defence peptides is unclear. In response, this study analyses the toxicity of a series of C-terminally amidated defence peptides and their non-amidated isoforms to normal fibroblast cells, a variety of tumour cells and bacterial cells. The toxicities of these peptides to microbial and cancer cells were generally <200 μM. Peptides were either unaffected by C-terminal amidation or showed up to 10-fold decreases or increases in efficacy. However, these peptides all showed toxicity to normal fibroblast cells with levels (generally <150 μM) that were comparable to those of their antimicrobial and anticancer activities. In contrast to previous claims which have been based on analysis of single amidation events, the results of this study clearly show that the C-terminal amidation of defence peptides has a variable effect on their antimicrobial and anticancer efficacy and no clear effect on their selectivity for these cell types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

AM:

C-terminally amidated

AC:

Non-C-terminally amidated

LD50 :

Half lethal dose

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

〈μH〉:

Mean hydrophobic moment

〈H〉:

The mean hydrophobicity

References

  1. Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A (2008) Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:357–375. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral L, Engi H, Viveiros M et al (2007) Review. Comparison of multidrug resistant efflux pumps of cancer and bacterial cells with respect to the same inhibitory agents. In Vivo 21:237–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennison SR, Wallace J, Harris F et al (2005) Amphiphilic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides and their structure/function relationships. Protein Pept Lett 12:31–39. doi:10.2174/0929866053406084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strandberg E, Tiltak D, Ieronimo M et al (2007) Influence of C-terminal amidation on the antimicrobial and hemolytic activities of cationic alpha-helical peptides. Pure Appl Chem 79:717–728. doi:10.1351/pac200779040717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie C, Zeng P, Ericksen B et al (2005) Effects of the terminal charges in human neutrophil alpha-defensin 2 on its bactericidal and membrane activity. Peptides 26:2377–2383. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2005.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang ST, Shin SY, Hahm KS et al (2006) Design of perfectly symmetric Trp-rich peptides with potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. Int J Antimicrob Agents 27:325–330. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.11.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennison SR, Whittaker M, Harris F et al (2006) Anticancer alpha-helical peptides and structure/function relationships underpinning their interactions with tumour cell membranes. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:487–499. doi:10.2174/138920306779025611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Apponyi MA, Pukala TL, Brinkworth CS et al (2004) Host-defence peptides of Australian anurans: structure, mechanism of action and evolutionary significance. Peptides 25:1035–1054. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2004.03.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Owen DR (2005) Short bioactive peptides. Helix BioMedix. Inc., USA. United States Patent 6875744

  10. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwilliger TC (1982) The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 299:371–374. doi:10.1038/299371a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris F, Wallace J, Phoenix DA (2000) Use of hydrophobic moment plot methodology to aid the identification of oblique orientated alpha-helices. Mol Membr Biol 17:201–207. doi:10.1080/09687680010018826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hennig L (2001) WinPep 2.11: novel software for PC-based analyses of amino acid sequences. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 31:201–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schibli DJ, Nguyen LT, Kernaghan SD et al (2006) Structure-function analysis of tritrpticin analogs: potential relationships between antimicrobial activities, model membrane interactions, and their micelle-bound NMR structures. Biophys J 91:4413–4426. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.085837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan YL, Cheng JT, Hale J et al (2007) Characterization of the structure and membrane interaction of the antimicrobial peptides aurein 2.2 and 2.3 from Australian southern bell frogs. Biophys J 92:2854–2864. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.097238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Andrew Phoenix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennison, S.R., Harris, F., Bhatt, T. et al. The effect of C-terminal amidation on the efficacy and selectivity of antimicrobial and anticancer peptides. Mol Cell Biochem 332, 43–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-009-0172-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-009-0172-8

Keywords

Navigation