Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times

Abstract

In this paper we demonstrate how to develop analytic closed form solutions to optimal multiple stopping time problems arising in the setting in which the value function acts on a compound process that is modified by the actions taken at the stopping times. This class of problem is particularly relevant in insurance and risk management settings and we demonstrate this on an important application domain based on insurance strategies in Operational Risk management for financial institutions. In this area of risk management the most prevalent class of loss process models is the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) framework which involves modelling annual losses via a compound process. Given an LDA model framework, we consider Operational Risk insurance products that mitigate the risk for such loss processes and may reduce capital requirements. In particular, we consider insurance products that grant the policy holder the right to insure k of its annual Operational losses in a horizon of T years. We consider two insurance product structures and two general model settings, the first are families of relevant LDA loss models that we can obtain closed form optimal stopping rules for under each generic insurance mitigation structure and then secondly classes of LDA models for which we can develop closed form approximations of the optimal stopping rules. In particular, for losses following a compound Poisson process with jump size given by an Inverse-Gaussian distribution and two generic types of insurance mitigation, we are able to derive analytic expressions for the loss process modified by the insurance application, as well as closed form solutions for the optimal multiple stopping rules in discrete time (annually). When the combination of insurance mitigation and jump size distribution does not lead to tractable stopping rules we develop a principled class of closed form approximations to the optimal decision rule. These approximations are developed based on a class of orthogonal Askey polynomial series basis expansion representations of the annual loss compound process distribution and functions of this annual loss.

References

  1. Aase KK (1993) Equilibrum in a reinsurance syndicate: existence, uniquiness and characterization. ASTIN Bull 23(2):185–211

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen L, Boudoukh J, Saunders A (2009) Understanding market, credit, and operational risk: the value at risk approach. Wiley

  3. Arrow KJ (1953) Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 11:41–47

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö

  5. Bazzarello D, Crielaard B, Piacenza F, Soprano A (2006) Modeling insurance mitigation on operational risk capital. J Oper Risk 1(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BCBS (2006) International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards - A Revised Framework (Comprehensive Version). Technical report, Bank for International Settlements

  7. BCBS (2010) Basel III: a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and baning systems. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements

  8. Bender C, Schoenmakers J (2006) An iterative method for multiple stopping: convergence and stability. Adv Appl Probab:729–749

  9. Bender C, Schoenmakers J, Zhang J (2013) Dual representations for general multiple stopping problems. Mathematical Finance

  10. Berliner B. (1982) Limits of insurability of risks. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliff, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borch K (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 30(3):424–444

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowers NL Jr (1966) Expansion of probability density functions as a sum of gamma densities with applications in risk theory. Trans Soc Actuar 18:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandts S (2004) Operational risk and insurance: quantitative and qualitative aspects. Working paper, Goethe University, Frankfurt

  14. Carmona R, Touzi N (2008) Optimal multiple stopping and valuation of swing options. Math Financ 18(2):239–268

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chernobai AS, Rachev ST, Fabozzi FJ (2008) Operational risk: a guide to Basel II capital requirements, models, and analysis, vol 180. Wiley

  16. Chhikara R, Folks J (1977) The inverse gaussian distribution as a lifetime model. Technometrics 19(4):461–468

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. EBA (2015) Final draft on ama assessment for operational risk. Technical report

  18. Embrechts P (1983) A property of the generalized inverse gaussian distribution with some applications. J Appl Probab:537–544

  19. Folks J, Chhikara R (1978) The inverse gaussian distribution and its statistical application–a review. J R Stat Soc Series B 40(3):263–289

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Franzetti C (2011) Operational risk modelling and management. Taylor & Francis, US

  21. Ghossoub M (2012) Belief heterogeneity in the arrow-borch-raviv insurance model. Available at SSRN 2028550

  22. Gollier C (2005) Some aspects of the economics of catastrophe risk insurance. Technical report. CESifo Working Paper Series

  23. Jackson D (1941) Fourier series and orthogonal polynomials. Courier Dover Publications

  24. Jaillet P, Ronn EI, Tompaidis S (2004) Valuation of commodity-based swing options. Manag Sci 50(7):909–921

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2001) Gram–charlier densities. J Econ Dyn Control 25(10):1457–1483

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jørgensen B (1982) Statistical properties of the generalized inverse Gaussian distribution, volume 9 of lecture notes in statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing american options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehr RI, Cammack E, Rose T (1980) Principles of insurance, vol 8. RD Irwin

  29. Nikolaev M, Sofronov G (2007) A multiple optimal stopping rule for sums of independent random variables. Discret Math Appl dma 17(5):463–473

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Peters GW, Byrnes AD, Shevchenko PV (2011) Impact of insurance for operational risk: is it worthwhile to insure or be insured for severe losses? Insur Math Econ 48(2):287–303

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Peters GW, Targino RS, Shevchenko PV (2013) Understanding operational risk capital approximations: first and second orders. J Govern Regulat 2(3):58–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Amer Econ Rev 69 (1):84–96

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sofronov G (2013) An optimal sequential procedure for a multiple selling problem with independent observations. Eur J Oper Res 225(2):332–336

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Sofronov G, Keith J, Kroese D (2006) An optimal sequential procedure for a buying-selling problem with independent observations. J Appl Probab 43(2):454–462

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Tweedie M (1957) Statistical properties of inverse gaussian distributions. Ann Math Stat 28(2):362–377

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Van den Brink GJ (2002) Operational risk: the new challenge for banks. Palgrave Macmillan

  37. Watson G (1922) A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions. Cambridge University Press

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo S. Targino.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Targino, R.S., Peters, G.W., Sofronov, G. et al. Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 19, 487–518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9493-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Insurance
  • Multiple stopping rules
  • Operational risk

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

  • 60G40
  • 62P05
  • 91B30
  • 41A58