Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  1. Home
  2. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability
  3. Article
Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

On the Ruin Probabilities in a Discrete Time Insurance Risk Process with Capital Injections and Reinsurance

09 January 2023

Abouzar Bazyari

Martingale method for optimal investment and proportional reinsurance

10 March 2021

Shuang-sui Liu, Wen-jing Guo & Xin-le Tong

Optimal Insurance Strategy Design in a Risk Process under Value-at-Risk Constraints on Capital Increments

01 September 2020

A. Yu. Golubin & V. N. Gridin

Uniform Asymptotics for Finite-time Ruin Probability in a Dependent Risk Model with General Stochastic Investment Return Process

08 October 2021

Yang Yang, Kam Chuen Yuen & Jun-feng Liu

A Mathematical Model of Insurer Bankruptcy on a Finite Time Interval

01 July 2021

A. A. Belolipetskiy & A. A. Sychev

Minimum capital requirement and portfolio allocation for non-life insurance: a semiparametric model with Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint

03 March 2023

Alessandro Staino, Emilio Russo, … Arturo Leccadito

Optimal Insurance Strategy in the Individual Risk Model under a Stochastic Constraint on the Value of the Final Capital

24 April 2019

A. Yu. Golubin & V. N. Gridin

Optimal mean–variance investment/reinsurance with common shock in a regime-switching market

16 January 2019

Junna Bi, Zhibin Liang & Kam Chuen Yuen

Ruin Probabilities for Risk Models with Constant Interest

01 March 2020

H. H. Nguyen

Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 12 April 2016

Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times

  • Rodrigo S. Targino  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-33111,
  • Gareth W. Peters1,
  • Georgy Sofronov2 &
  • …
  • Pavel V. Shevchenko3 

Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability volume 19, pages 487–518 (2017)Cite this article

  • 767 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In this paper we demonstrate how to develop analytic closed form solutions to optimal multiple stopping time problems arising in the setting in which the value function acts on a compound process that is modified by the actions taken at the stopping times. This class of problem is particularly relevant in insurance and risk management settings and we demonstrate this on an important application domain based on insurance strategies in Operational Risk management for financial institutions. In this area of risk management the most prevalent class of loss process models is the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) framework which involves modelling annual losses via a compound process. Given an LDA model framework, we consider Operational Risk insurance products that mitigate the risk for such loss processes and may reduce capital requirements. In particular, we consider insurance products that grant the policy holder the right to insure k of its annual Operational losses in a horizon of T years. We consider two insurance product structures and two general model settings, the first are families of relevant LDA loss models that we can obtain closed form optimal stopping rules for under each generic insurance mitigation structure and then secondly classes of LDA models for which we can develop closed form approximations of the optimal stopping rules. In particular, for losses following a compound Poisson process with jump size given by an Inverse-Gaussian distribution and two generic types of insurance mitigation, we are able to derive analytic expressions for the loss process modified by the insurance application, as well as closed form solutions for the optimal multiple stopping rules in discrete time (annually). When the combination of insurance mitigation and jump size distribution does not lead to tractable stopping rules we develop a principled class of closed form approximations to the optimal decision rule. These approximations are developed based on a class of orthogonal Askey polynomial series basis expansion representations of the annual loss compound process distribution and functions of this annual loss.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Aase KK (1993) Equilibrum in a reinsurance syndicate: existence, uniquiness and characterization. ASTIN Bull 23(2):185–211

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Allen L, Boudoukh J, Saunders A (2009) Understanding market, credit, and operational risk: the value at risk approach. Wiley

  • Arrow KJ (1953) Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 11:41–47

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö

  • Bazzarello D, Crielaard B, Piacenza F, Soprano A (2006) Modeling insurance mitigation on operational risk capital. J Oper Risk 1(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCBS (2006) International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards - A Revised Framework (Comprehensive Version). Technical report, Bank for International Settlements

  • BCBS (2010) Basel III: a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and baning systems. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements

  • Bender C, Schoenmakers J (2006) An iterative method for multiple stopping: convergence and stability. Adv Appl Probab:729–749

  • Bender C, Schoenmakers J, Zhang J (2013) Dual representations for general multiple stopping problems. Mathematical Finance

  • Berliner B. (1982) Limits of insurability of risks. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliff, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 30(3):424–444

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers NL Jr (1966) Expansion of probability density functions as a sum of gamma densities with applications in risk theory. Trans Soc Actuar 18:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts S (2004) Operational risk and insurance: quantitative and qualitative aspects. Working paper, Goethe University, Frankfurt

  • Carmona R, Touzi N (2008) Optimal multiple stopping and valuation of swing options. Math Financ 18(2):239–268

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chernobai AS, Rachev ST, Fabozzi FJ (2008) Operational risk: a guide to Basel II capital requirements, models, and analysis, vol 180. Wiley

  • Chhikara R, Folks J (1977) The inverse gaussian distribution as a lifetime model. Technometrics 19(4):461–468

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • EBA (2015) Final draft on ama assessment for operational risk. Technical report

  • Embrechts P (1983) A property of the generalized inverse gaussian distribution with some applications. J Appl Probab:537–544

  • Folks J, Chhikara R (1978) The inverse gaussian distribution and its statistical application–a review. J R Stat Soc Series B 40(3):263–289

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franzetti C (2011) Operational risk modelling and management. Taylor & Francis, US

  • Ghossoub M (2012) Belief heterogeneity in the arrow-borch-raviv insurance model. Available at SSRN 2028550

  • Gollier C (2005) Some aspects of the economics of catastrophe risk insurance. Technical report. CESifo Working Paper Series

  • Jackson D (1941) Fourier series and orthogonal polynomials. Courier Dover Publications

  • Jaillet P, Ronn EI, Tompaidis S (2004) Valuation of commodity-based swing options. Manag Sci 50(7):909–921

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2001) Gram–charlier densities. J Econ Dyn Control 25(10):1457–1483

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen B (1982) Statistical properties of the generalized inverse Gaussian distribution, volume 9 of lecture notes in statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing american options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehr RI, Cammack E, Rose T (1980) Principles of insurance, vol 8. RD Irwin

  • Nikolaev M, Sofronov G (2007) A multiple optimal stopping rule for sums of independent random variables. Discret Math Appl dma 17(5):463–473

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GW, Byrnes AD, Shevchenko PV (2011) Impact of insurance for operational risk: is it worthwhile to insure or be insured for severe losses? Insur Math Econ 48(2):287–303

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GW, Targino RS, Shevchenko PV (2013) Understanding operational risk capital approximations: first and second orders. J Govern Regulat 2(3):58–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Amer Econ Rev 69 (1):84–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofronov G (2013) An optimal sequential procedure for a multiple selling problem with independent observations. Eur J Oper Res 225(2):332–336

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sofronov G, Keith J, Kroese D (2006) An optimal sequential procedure for a buying-selling problem with independent observations. J Appl Probab 43(2):454–462

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tweedie M (1957) Statistical properties of inverse gaussian distributions. Ann Math Stat 28(2):362–377

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink GJ (2002) Operational risk: the new challenge for banks. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Watson G (1922) A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions. Cambridge University Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK

    Rodrigo S. Targino & Gareth W. Peters

  2. Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Georgy Sofronov

  3. CSIRO, Sydney, Australia

    Pavel V. Shevchenko

Authors
  1. Rodrigo S. Targino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gareth W. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georgy Sofronov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pavel V. Shevchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo S. Targino.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Targino, R.S., Peters, G.W., Sofronov, G. et al. Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 19, 487–518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9493-8

Download citation

  • Received: 16 February 2015

  • Revised: 02 November 2015

  • Accepted: 06 March 2016

  • Published: 12 April 2016

  • Issue Date: June 2017

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9493-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Insurance
  • Multiple stopping rules
  • Operational risk

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

  • 60G40
  • 62P05
  • 91B30
  • 41A58
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.