Advertisement

Symmetry Studies for Data Analysis

  • Marlos VianaEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper describes some of the basic applications of the algebraic theory of canonical decomposition to the analysis of data. The notions of structured data and symmetry studies are discussed and applied to demonstrate their role in well known principles of analysis of variance and their applicability in more general experimental settings.

Keywords

Symmetry Data analysis Group theory Analysis of variance 

AMS 2000 Subject Classification

20C30 11E25 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Viana, Symmetry Studies—an Introduction, IMPA Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Viana, Lecture Notes on Symmetry Studies, EURANDOM, Eindhoven University of Technology: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2005 (2005-027, Electronic version http://www.eurandom.tue.nl).Google Scholar
  3. J.-P. Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups, Springer: New York, 1977.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Viana, and D. Richards, “Contemporary mathematics—algebraic methods in statistics and probability.” In M. Viana and D. Richards (eds.), vol. 287, American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, 2001Google Scholar
  5. M. Risse, “Democracy and social choice: A response to Saari,” John F. Kennedy School of Government. Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP03-023, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. R. A. Fisher, “The theory of confounding in factorial experiments in relation to the theory of groups,” Annals of Eugenics vol. 11 pp. 341–353, 1942.Google Scholar
  7. R. A. Fisher, “A system of confounding for factors with more than two alternatives, giving completely orthogonal cubes and higher powers,” Annals of Eugenics vol. 12 pp. 283–290, 1945.Google Scholar
  8. P.v.d. Ven, and A. Di Bucchianico, Factorial Designs and Harmonic Analysis on Finite Abelian Groups, EURANDOM: Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2006 (2006-023, Electronic version http://www.eurandom.tue.nl).Google Scholar
  9. V. Lakshminarayanan, and M. Viana, “Dihedral representations and statistical geometric optics I: Spherocylindrical lenses,” Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science vol. 22(11) pp. 2483–2489, 2005.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Viana, and V. Lakshminarayanan, “Dihedral representations and statistical geometric optics II: Elementary instruments,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 54(4) pp. 473–485, 2007.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. E. O’Neill, Introduction to Statistical Optics, Dover: New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. M. Viana, and V. Lakshminarayanan, “Data analytic aspects of chirality,” Symmetry vol. 16(14), 2005.Google Scholar
  13. H. Eghbalnia, J. Townsend, and A.H. Assadi, Symmetry, Features and Information. In E. Bayro-Corrochano (ed.) Springer: New York, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. M. Viana, “Symmetry studies and decompositions of entropy,” Entropy vol. 8(2) pp. 88–109, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Campbell, “The refractive group,” Optometry and Vision Science vol. 74 pp. 381–387, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Viana, “Invariance conditions for random curvature models,” Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability vol. 5 pp. 439–453, 2003.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Viana, Structured Data—An Introduction to the Study of Symmetry in Applications, Cambridge University Press: New York, 2007, in press.Google Scholar
  18. M. L. Eaton, Multivariate Statistics—A Vector Space Approach, Wiley: New York, 1983.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. R. J. Muirhead, Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory, Wiley: New York, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. K. F. Riley, M. P. Hobson, and S. J. Bence, Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press: New York, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. B. Bai, and L. Li, “Reduction of computation time for crossed-grating problems: a group-theoretic approach,” Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science vol. 22(4) pp. 654–661, 2005.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. D. C. Harris, and M. D. Bertolucci, Symmetry and Spectroscopy—An Introduction to Vibrational and Electronic Spectroscopy, Oxford University Press: New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  23. W. Faris, “Review of Roland Omnès, the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society vol. 43(11) pp. 1328–1339, 1996.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Press: Princeton, NJ, 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. P. Cartier, “A mad day’s work: from Grothendiek to Connes and Kontsevich- the evolution of concepts of space and symmetry,” Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society vol. 38(4) pp. 389–408, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. W. J. Youden, Statistical Methods for Chemists, Wiley: New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  27. G. James, and M. Liebeck, Representations and Characters of Groups, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. E. Wit, and P. McCullagh, The extendibility of statistical models. In M. Viana, and D. Richards, (eds.) Contemporary Mathematics—Algebraic Methods in Statistics and Probability, vol. 287 pp. 327–340, American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois Eye and Ear InfirmaryChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations