Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 141–167 | Cite as

Making sense of the lived body and the lived world: meaning and presence in Husserl, Derrida and Noë

  • Jacob Martin Rump
Article

Abstract

I argue that Husserl’s transcendental account of the role of the lived body in sense-making is a precursor to Alva Noë’s recent work on the enactive, embodied mind, specifically his notion of “sensorimotor knowledge” as a form of embodied sense-making that avoids representationalism and intellectualism. Derrida’s deconstructive account of meaning—developed largely through a critique of Husserl—relies on the claim that meaning is structured through the complication of the “interiority” of consciousness by an “outside,” and thus might be thought to lend itself to theories of mind such as Noë’s that emphasize the ways in which sense-making occurs outside the head. But while Derrida’s notion of “contamination” rightly points to an indeterminateness of meaning in an outside, extended, concrete lived world, he ultimately reduces meaning to a structure of signification. This casts indeterminateness in terms of absence, ignoring the presence of non-linguistic phenomena of embodied sense-making central to both the contemporary enactivist program and to the later Husserl, who is able to account for the indeterminateness of meaning in lived experience through his distinction between sense (Sinn) and more exact linguistic meaning (Bedeutung). Husserl’s transcendental theory of meaning also allows for a substantive contribution to sense-making from the side of the perceived object—an aspect missing from Noë’s account. Thus, in contrast to Derrida and to Noë, Husserl accounts for sense-making in terms of both the lived body and the lived world.

Keywords

Meaning Presence Perception Embodiment Intentionality Husserl Derrida Noë 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Walter Hopp and Lisa Chinn for helpful conversations concerning the ideas in this paper, David Carr and Dermot Moran for comments on earlier drafts of some of the material, and an anonymous referee for extremely helpful insights and suggestions on a previous draft.

References

  1. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda. 2016. Phenomenology as critique: Teleological–historical reflection and Husserl’s transcendental eidetics. Husserl Studies 32: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennington, Geoffrey. 2000. Interrupting Derrida. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Benoist, Jocelyn. 2008. Fulfilment. In Phenomenology as grammar, ed. J.P. Gálvez. Frankfurt a.M.: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Benoist, Jocelyn. 2014. Intentionalität und Erfüllung: Husserlianische Meditationen über die vorgreifende Struktur der Intentionalität. In Phänomenologie der Sinnereignisse, ed. L. Tengelyi, T.N. Klass, and H. Gondek. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bower, Matt. 2014. Affectively driven perception: Toward a non-representational phenomenology. Husserl Studies 30: 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, John. 2008. Sensorimotor knowledge and naïve realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 666–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, David. 1974. Phenomenology and the problem of history. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, David. 2014. Experience and history: Phenomenological perspectives on the historical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, Vincenzo. 1998. Transcendental aesthetic and the problem of transcendentality. In Alterity and facticity: New perspectives on Husserl, ed. Dan Zahavi, and Natalie Depraz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Crowell, Steven. 2013. Normativity and phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrida, Jacques. 1962. Introduction to Edmund Husserl: L’Origine de la Géométrie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, Jacques. 1967a. De la Grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, Jacques. 1967b. La voix et le phénomène: Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénoménologie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, Jacques. (ed.). 1972a. La forme et le vouloir-dire: Note sur la phénoménologie du langage. In Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, Jacques. (ed.). 1972b. Signature, événement, contexte. In Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, Jacques. 1973. Form and meaning: A note on the phenomenology of language. In Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (trans: David Allison), 107–128. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Edmund Husserl’s “origin of geometry”: An introduction (trans: J.P. Leavy). Stony Brook, NY: Nicholas Hays.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Signature event context. In Margins of philosophy (trans: Alan Bass). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Derrida, Jacques. 1990. Le Problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  20. Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Of grammatology. Baltimore: Corrected Edition.Google Scholar
  21. Derrida, Jacques. 2003. The problem of genesis in Husserl’s philosophy (trans: Marian Hobson). Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Derrida, Jacques. 2011. Voice and phenomenon: Introduction to the problem of the sign in Husserl’s phenomenology (trans: Leonard Lawlor). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dreyfus, Hubert. 2005. Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. In Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79: 47–65.Google Scholar
  24. Dreyfus, Hubert. 2007. Response to McDowell. Inquiry 50: 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drummond, John. 1990. Husserlian intentionality and non-foundational realism: Noema and object. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drummond, John. 2012. Intentionality without representationalism. In The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology, ed. Dan Zahavi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, J.Claude. 1991. Strategies of deconstruction: Derrida and the myth of the voice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gibson, James J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, Claire Ortiz. 1991. Word and object in Husserl, Frege, and Russell: The roots of twentieth-century philosophy, 1st ed. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hintikka, Jaakko. 1984. A hundred years later: The rise and fall of Frege’s influence in language theory. Synthese 59: 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodge, Joanna. 2009. Topography of the border: Derrida rewriting transcendental aesthetics. In The catastrophic imperative: Subjectivity, time and memory in contemporary thought, ed. G. Buelens, D. Hoens, and S. Jöttkandt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Husserl, Edmund. 1964a. Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchung zur Genealogie der Logik, ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Claassen Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Husserl, Edmund. 1964b. the phenomenology of internal time-consciousness (trans: J.S. Churchill). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Husserl, Edmund. 1969a. Formal and transcendental logic (trans: Dorian Cairns). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, Edmund. 1969b. Husserliana 10. Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstesens (18931917), ed. Rudolf Boehm. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, ed. David Carr (trans: David Carr). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic, ed. Ludwig Landgrebe (trans: James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Husserl, Edmund. 1974. Husserliana 17. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, ed. Paul Janssen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  39. Husserl, Edmund. 1975. Husserliana 18. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Text der 1. und der 2. Auflage. Halle: 1900, rev. ed. 1913, ed. Elmar Holenstein. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  40. Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Husserliana 6. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  41. Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Husserliana 3-1. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführungin die reine Phänomenologie 1. Halbband: Text der 1.3. AuflageNachdruck, ed. Karl Schuhmann. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  42. Husserl, Edmund. 1984. Husserliana 19. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden, ed. Ursula Panzer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  43. Husserl, Edmund. 1987. Husserliana 26. Vorlesungen über Bedeutungslehre. Sommersemester 1908, ed. Ursula Panzer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  44. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. The idea of phenomenology (trans: Lee Hardy). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  45. Husserl, Edmund. 2000. Husserliana 31. Aktive Synthesen: Aus der Vorlesung “Transzendentale Logik” 1920/21. Ergänzungsband zu “Analysen zur passiven Synthesis”, ed. Roland Breeur. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  46. Husserl, Edmund. 2001a. Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic (trans: Anthony Steinbock). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Husserl, Edmund. 2001b. Logical investigations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Husserl, Edmund. 2002. Husserliana 20/1. Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913), ed. Ulrich Melle. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  49. Husserl, Edmund. 2014. Ideas for a pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to pure phenomenology (trans: Dan Dahlstrom). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  50. Jansen, Julia. 2014. Taking a transcendental stance: Anti-representationalism and direct realism in Kant and Husserl. In Husserl und die klassische deutsche Philosophie, ed. Faustino Fabbianelli and Sebastian Luft. Phaenomenologica 212. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of pure reason. In Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kusch, Martin. 1989. Language as calculus vs. Language as universal medium: A study in Husserl, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mohanty, Jitendranath. 1976. Edmund husserl’s theory of meaning. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lohmar, Dieter. 1998. Erfahrung und Kategoriales Denken—Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Noë, Alva. 2008. Reply to Campbell, Martin, and Kelly. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Noë, Alva. 2009. Conscious reference. The Philosophical Quarterly 59: 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noë, Alva. 2012. Varieties of presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Noë, Alva. 2015. Concept pluralism, direct perception, and the fragility of presence. In Thomas Metzinger and Jennifer M. Windt ed. Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.Google Scholar
  60. Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology (trans: Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree). Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rinofner-Kreidel, Sonja. 2013. Mental contents, transparency, realism: News from the phenomenological camp. Husserl Studies 29: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roy, Jean-Michel, and Jean-François Courtine. 1996. La dissociation Husserlienne du Sinn et de la Bedeutung. In Phénoménologique et Logique, 149–169. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole Normale Superieur.Google Scholar
  63. Ruin, Hans. 2010. Seeing meaning: Frege and Derrida on ideality and the limits of Husserlian intuitionism. Husserl Studies 27: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rump, Jacob. 2014a. Kant, Husserl, and the Case for Non-Conceptual Content. In Husserl und die klassische deutsche Philosophie, ed. Faustino Fabbianelli, and Sebastian Luft, 281–295. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01710-5_19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rump, Jacob. 2014b. Steven Crowell: Normativity and phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review 47: 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, David Woodruff. 2006. Husserl. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Vandevelde, Pol. 2008. An unpleasant but felicitous ambiguity. In Meaning and language: Phenomenological perspectives, ed. F. Mattens. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Welton, Donn. 1983. The origins of meaning: A critical study of the thresholds of Husserlian phenomenology. The Hague: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Welton, Donn. 2000. The other Husserl: The horizons of transcendental phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Zahavi, Dan. 1999. Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kilachand Honors CollegeBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations